I am very new to photography and i am just wondering should i buy a tripod now are later after i am use to the camera?
Later, after you become aware of how it might improve the circmstances of YOUR picture taking ...
The nature photographer, John Shaw, once told me that if I wanted to improve every lens I owned by a significant amount, I should get a solid tripod. He was right. I rarely make an image now (other than grandkids) without the tripod. It does make a difference. Not only are the images sharper, but the process forces you to slow down and carefully analyze the image you are trying to create.
Bob Boner wrote:
The nature photographer, John Shaw, once told me that if I wanted to improve every lens I owned by a significant amount, I should get a solid tripod. He was right. I rarely make an image now (other than grandkids) without the tripod. It does make a difference. Not only are the images sharper, but the process forces you to slow down and carefully analyze the image you are trying to create.
thanks for that as i have been looking around to get one
I vote for waiting. While a tripod can give you a sharper image, I think figuring out how to capture the scene you see is more important.
AandAPhotography wrote:
thanks for that as i have been looking around to get one
Think of the amount of dollars that you think you want to spend on a tripod.
Now at least triple it, then double it again, and don't spend less than that.
Chances are, that you won't want to "waste" too much money on one, so you are probably even looking at those $29 ones in the magazine or Walmart or wherever.
They are junk and if you buy anything like that it will be flimsy and break and you will just have to buy another. Save your $29, save your, save your $99.
Is your camera a DSLR?
If it is, you need to be spending in the hundreds of dollars.
Something like a Manfrotto 190 XProB with a ballhead.
Although I have seen reports on here of a good quality cheap Dolica that someone may fill you in on. I am not familiar with them.
lighthouse wrote:
Think of the amount of dollars that you think you want to spend on a tripod.
Now at least triple it, then double it again, and don't spend less than that.
Chances are, that you won't want to "waste" too much money on one, so you are probably even looking at those $29 ones in the magazine or Walmart or wherever.
They are junk and if you buy anything like that it will be flimsy and break and you will just have to buy another. Save your $29, save your, save your $99.
Is your camera a DSLR?
If it is, you need to be spending in the hundreds of dollars.
Something like a Manfrotto 190 XProB with a ballhead.
Although I have seen reports on here of a good quality cheap Dolica that someone may fill you in on. I am not familiar with them.
Think of the amount of dollars that you think you ... (
show quote)
Thanks for that. If i was to buy one it wouldnt be a cheap one because you get what you pay for so i would want a quality make and a tough one too.
Yes its a DSLR Canon EOS 700D
AandAPhotography wrote:
I am very new to photography and i am just wondering should i buy a tripod now are later after i am use to the camera?
Your first inclination will be to grab an "El Cheapo" from Best Buy or Wal Mart. Though they will be better then nothing you will quickly find yourself wanting better. Stick around and see what others use in the next ensuing months. A dependable solid setup will go around $100-$150 for a set of legs and $100 up for a good head. I currently have an aluminum Manfrotto 190 MORE with a Manfrotto horizontal pistol grip ball head. As my needs change so will my equipment.
AandAPhotography wrote:
Thanks for that. If i was to buy one it wouldnt be a cheap one because you get what you pay for so i would want a quality make and a tough one too.
Yes its a DSLR Canon EOS 700D
I use a Benro C2580TB2 which I find quite solid but light enough.
The main thing to remember with tripod purchases.
Cheap.
Light.
Stable.
Choose two.
I have 2 gitzos and an Induro 213. The gitzos I use for heavy lenses (primarily 600mm) and the Induro for anything up to 300 f/4. The induro ($390) was less than half the cost of the gitzos and is very good for my uses. A wimpy tripod causes more problems than it solves. It is currently available with a 25% discount.
lighthouse wrote:
Think of the amount of dollars that you think you want to spend on a tripod.
Now at least triple it, then double it again, and don't spend less than that.
Chances are, that you won't want to "waste" too much money on one, so you are probably even looking at those $29 ones in the magazine or Walmart or wherever.
They are junk and if you buy anything like that it will be flimsy and break and you will just have to buy another. Save your $29, save your, save your $99.
Is your camera a DSLR?
If it is, you need to be spending in the hundreds of dollars.
Something like a Manfrotto 190 XProB with a ballhead.
Although I have seen reports on here of a good quality cheap Dolica that someone may fill you in on. I am not familiar with them.
Think of the amount of dollars that you think you ... (
show quote)
The dolica tripods are great for the money. I have the 3lbs. carbon fiber model with a 3 way bubble level and sturdy ball head , also converts to a monopod for under $200 and holds up to 20 lbs. I got mine at Costco. They also make a 3.5 lbs. proline model for around $89 that supports 13lbs but does not have monopod conversion.
http://m.costco.com/Dolica-Premium-Traveler-60%22-Carbon-Fiber-TripodMonopod-with-Ball-Head-Bundle-.product.100073662.html
AandAPhotography wrote:
Thanks for that. If i was to buy one it wouldnt be a cheap one because you get what you pay for so i would want a quality make and a tough one too.
Yes its a DSLR Canon EOS 700D
Korean company Horusbennu makes amazing tripods. I own two. Worth every penny (@75.00 - 700.00). Search "Horusbennu" on eBay. Shipping from Korea is surprisingly quick and smooth.
Big one is carbon fiber (8 layer) and aluminium, 3 sections, 36mm main leg diameter, 60+ lbs capacity, weighs 3.3 lbs, @ 400.00 (FX-9353TT), head not included.
Small one is aluminum and magnesium, 5 section, 25mm main leg diameter, 13 lbs capacity, weighs 2.33 lbs (M-2531T) @ 80.00. head not included.
Both tripods are as good or better in build quality and features than the same price equivalent of most other brands IMHO. I give you these specifications because they are a good place to start comparing. Do your own feature/price comparison and keep in mind that the purpose of a tripod is to provide as rock solid a platform as possible.
I got the 190 series Manfrotto carbon fiber and mag ball head,but it's not heavy duty. It serves me well,but I sprung for a good monopod with a tilt head that's easy to carry and little set-up time. It certainly does not replace the tripod,but it is a help. Ran both of them a lot of miles in Yellowstone for a couple weeks and they had their place. I shake too much to shoot free hand. Depends on you and your usage.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.