h2odog Loc: Brooklyn NY

RJM, I see that you have many wonderful cameras and lenses. How do you decide which ones to use? What is your favorite kit?

jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY

Yes, scary stats. I've decided that I have to cut back. Actually, I take lots of pictures and I post occasionally, but posting pics isn't my main interest. I like reading and posting.

Right now I'm in town getting a new key programmed for my car. Then I'll drive around and take some shots. I love not having to buy film.

NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian

:thumbup: ...or wait for the film to come back from the developer.

Harry Thomas Loc: Doylestown, Pennsylvania

My only caution is, if you don't plan to do any creative off camera lighting, the Sony RX100III is fine. It doesn't have a hot shoe. Without a hot shoe, you can't use a flash trigger. For my purposes it's required. The Sony RX100II offer that feature with the optional EVF accessory at an additional cost. It's a great camera and I use it everywhere I go. Have fun.

I.R.Dartmoor Loc: Sunningdale, Berkshire, England.

I have had the RX100 for about 18 months, its a REAL quality Item, and if I was in the market for any of the RX100 range, I would still go for the ORIGINAL RX100, mainly because I can't see any great difference between each version, although the 24mm lens of the new version would be nice, but as the first version is readily available for around £350 in the UK and $498at http://www.bhphotovideo.com/..... while the RX100lll is $798 and £699.......to me, its a no brainer really!!

h2odog Loc: Brooklyn NY

Any of the Sony RX100 models are terrific. One feature that I have found very useful on my RX100II is the tilt screen which is great for street photography. It lets you blend into the crowd without drawing attention to yourself.

RJM Loc: Cardiff, S Wales, UK

I spend too much time on Facebook but it keeps me in touch with friends and family , so I'm not all of a lost cause.

Whatever did we do before the internet?

At least if someone buys a camera they aren't happy with then that's their fault....as there's so much out there to reference.

Keep posting....it's not as though you murdered anyone!
:lol:

RJM Loc: Cardiff, S Wales, UK

There are differences between them all!

The big difference between the 1 and 2 models is the 2 has a backlit sensor and tilt screen. The sensor alone is worth the price.

The big difference between mk2 and 3 is the 3 has 5 axis stabilisation and an inbuilt electronic viewfinder. It also has a wider angle of view but shorter telephoto lens.

I have the EVF for the mk2. That is superb but at least it can be removed if needing to go in a trouser or shirt pocket.

I'd say it was a toss up between mk2 and mk 3 depending on your needs and budget.

If budget not a problem, then the mk3 is the one.

MtnMan Loc: ID

Likely a good choice. There are many similar. You might check on snapsort for the ones it considers similar. There are two thing's I'd require for "DSLR capabilities: 1. RAW files, and 2. APS-C size sensor.

My primary camera is a Nikon D800. Nothing beats it for quality. But it is heavy and cumbersome. I recently got a Sony NEX 7 for hiking and travel. It has an APS-C 24MP sensor and wonderful electronic viewfinder. It is mirrorless and weighs next to nothing compared to the D800. It uses interchangeable lenses but I'm OK with that. Alas, Sony has discontinued it before offering a replacement. They have the 6000 which is pretty close but has an inferior viewfinder. They are supposed to offer a direct replacement soon.

I really enjoy the NEX 7. It is taking a bit to learn Sony-speak (compared to Nikon-speak). My general impression is that they do a much better job on the software. Nikon does a much better job on their lenses.

Edit PS: I looked it up. It seems a great camera to me. I think the EVF essential so wouldn't consider the earlier models. The sensor is smaller than the NEX 7 and I prefer the flexibility of interchangeable lenses, though. One of the cool things about the NEX 7 is that the EVF turns on automatically when you put your eye to it. I didn't see if this one does that, but suspect it might. It is very handy.

Beercat Loc: Central Coast of California

Gene -

Everyone has their own personal preference so you will get all kinds of responses, no one what's to say, "I got the 2nd best camera in it's class."

The Sony RX100 is best in class in many categories. Only draw back is the limitation on the zoom which for most people isn't a big issue in this category of camera.

bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA

I have a few cameras. One is an RX100. If all were lost or stolen, the first replacement would be the RX100. If rules were made that say I can have only keep one camera, it would be the RX100. When I travel light with minimum carry on weight and luggage space, I take the RX100.

When my DW wanted a new camera, I gave here the same advice. She considered it briefly and bought a Panasonic GM1. It does have a little bigger sensor and form factor, but she carries a purse and I only have pockets.

imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida

The Canon is better if you value IQ over convenience ....

Festus Loc: North Dakota

I purchased the original Sony RX100. Have been completely satisfied with it! Very convenient, functional, great quality. Each new version makes me want to upgrade. You will not be disappointed in the RX100III.

ole sarg Loc: south florida

I am waiting for the new Powershot G17. I use a G10 and find that it does 98% of what I need. The 17 will have faster lens and longer reach.

Ched49 Loc: Pittsburgh, Pa.

I agree. I'm a fan of the the advanced point & shoot cameras and the Sony RX series has been ahead of the class for years. A lot of people are saying the compact system cameras are going to take over the advanced point & shoot category...I disagree, with a point & shoot, no need to change lenses and as far as size...the advanced point & shoot is roughly the same size as a CSC (body only) but once you attach the lens...it becomes big in a hurry.