Any Thoughts On Why Not A Sony RX100III: As mentioned in a post couple of weeks ago my Lumix FZ200 was taken when my car was broken into. Having to replace the camera has made me...

GeneinChi Loc: Chicago, IL

As mentioned in a post couple of weeks ago my Lumix FZ200 was taken when my car was broken into. Having to replace the camera has made me re-think what i REALLY do with my camera. Its primarily family, grandkids, vacations, a little street photography and whatever else I happen to bump into when walking around. I am not a birder. landscape photographer nor do i take pictures of the moon. I want something small with dslr capabilities. I don't want to be dragging around a larger camera and multiple lenses. This has led me to the Sony RX100III. I'm planning to pull the trigger in a couple of weeks. Before I do, does anyone have any suggestions other than the Sony with similar features? Everything I've read about it so far has convinced me this is the way to go for my purposes. Thank you in advance.

Ched49 Loc: Pittsburgh, Pa.

The RX series from Sony is a good choice for advance point & shoot, along with the the G series from Canon and P series from Nikon. Since I bought my P7100, I'm using it more than my DSLR, simply because it's a lot easier to carry around and the picture quality looks great.

rp2s Loc: Pittsburgh, PA

Hello Gene, I'm thinking the difference in zoom will be quite significant. If you originally purchased the FZ200 for its range, I would consider the new FZ1000 to be my replacement. It uses the same 1" sensor as the RX100 III, but has a 25-400mm lens, rather than the 24-70mm on the RX100 III. I believe the FZ1000 will be priced at $900, about $100 more than the RX100. Good luck. :lol:

http://www.dpreview.com/products/panasonic/compacts/panasonic_dmcfz1000

h2odog Loc: Brooklyn NY

I have the Sony RX100II and love it. From what you have said about the type of photography you like to do, the RX100III seems like a good choice. It doesn't have a touch screen but the addition of an EVF is a very desirable feature. If you think that the 24-70mm will serve your needs, you will be quite happy with it. I would recommend the Sony grip accessory and if you need a small pouch to carry it in, Op/Tech makes some really terrific ones with magnetic closures that can be pocketable or fit on a belt. The menu system is pretty straight forward and easy to navigate. One nice feature is the one touch wireless image transfer to a computer. You don't have to take out the SD card or attach a cable to transfer images to the computer. If you have a chance to hold the camera in a store, see if the size works for you. Good luck with your purchase.

DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX

I would be hard pressed to consider the RX-100 series "point and shoot" cameras. I have the RX-100 and I think it is great. Good luck.

GeneinChi wrote:

As mentioned in a post couple of weeks ago my Lumi... (show quote)

Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI

The only reason why not would be price and if you wanted more of a zoom.

NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian

GeneinChi wrote:

As mentioned in a post couple of weeks ago my Lumi... (show quote)

Did you use the FZ200's zoom much? If not, the Sony is a perfect choice. I have its sister-camera, the RX 10, which has the same sensor and processor. The results are beautiful.

GeneinChi Loc: Chicago, IL

Thanks for the reply. Only question I have is about the lack of a flash. Is the camera so fast that one is not needed?

DavidPine wrote:

I would be hard pressed to consider the RX-100 series "point and shoot" cameras. I have the RX-100 and I think it is great. Good luck.

h2odog Loc: Brooklyn NY

GeneinChi wrote:

Thanks for the reply. Only question I have is about the lack of a flash. Is the camera so fast that one is not needed?

If you are referring to the Sony RX100III, it has a pop-up flash.

GeneinChi Loc: Chicago, IL

Yeow...must have missed that. Thanks for the heads up.

Gene

h2odog wrote:

If you are referring to the Sony RX100III, it has a pop-up flash.

GeneinChi Loc: Chicago, IL

Thanks for the response. When I actually thought about what I wanted the camera for, this makes sense. If I ever go on a safari or need a camera with a long reach, I'll deal with it then. And you are right about the EVF..that was a major deciding point.

h2odog wrote:

I have the Sony RX100II and love it. From what you... (show quote)

GeneinChi Loc: Chicago, IL

cjkorb wrote:

The RX series from Sony is a good choice for advance point & shoot, along with the the G series from Canon and P series from Nikon. Since I bought my P7100, I'm using it more than my DSLR, simply because it's a lot easier to carry around and the picture quality looks great.

I found the Canon to be just a tad too large. Thanks for the response.

GeneinChi Loc: Chicago, IL

Thanks for the response. I just looked up the new FZ1000 and it looks like a beaut. If the time comes when I need more reach I'll definitely have that on my short list. Right now thought I'm tilting towards the Sony.

rp2s wrote:

Hello Gene, I'm thinking the difference in zoom will be quite significant. If you originally purchased the FZ200 for its range, I would consider the new FZ1000 to be my replacement. It uses the same 1" sensor as the RX100 III, but has a 25-400mm lens, rather than the 24-70mm on the RX100 III. I believe the FZ1000 will be priced at $900, about $100 more than the RX100. Good luck. :lol:

http://www.dpreview.com/products/panasonic/compacts/panasonic_dmcfz1000

GeneinChi Loc: Chicago, IL

thanks for the response. Right now my needs don't call for a a long zoom. Glad the RX10 is working for you. Looking forward to the Sony.

NeilL wrote:

Did you use the FZ200's zoom much? If not, the Sony is a perfect choice. I have its sister-camera, the RX 10, which has the same sensor and processor. The results are beautiful.

Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI

LX-8 looks spectacular too. July 16th is the release date.