Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Where the Middle Class went.
Page <<first <prev 5 of 12 next> last>>
Jan 1, 2014 12:20:04   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
Twardlow wrote:
Another glib retort from the conservative warrior and enforcer who is very impressed with what he thinks.

Of course, the retort isn't very good, is it?

Folks, the disappearing middle class is an important issue. People who make a million dollars a month plus stock options pay those who labor seven or eight dollars an hour.

Estimate a budget --housing, auto and insurance, health insurance, food, etc--for someone making $8/hr, $320/wk for 40 hours (if he can get them)--$16,000/annum.

You can't live on that, and forcing people to try is going to lead to disastrous results.

The solution to this is not found in oily, un-informed, and snarly quips.

This is a real problem which requires real thought, which should preclude it from being discussed on this forum and in the above manner.
Another glib retort from the conservative warrior ... (show quote)


well, shucks,foilks…Im impressed with what Blurry thinks, too…He is right on today, as usual..

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 12:23:07   #
PrairieSeasons Loc: Red River of the North
 
Twardlow wrote:
Another glib retort from the conservative warrior and enforcer who is very impressed with what he thinks.

Of course, the retort isn't very good, is it?

Folks, the disappearing middle class is an important issue. People who make a million dollars a month plus stock options pay those who labor seven or eight dollars an hour.

Estimate a budget --housing, auto and insurance, health insurance, food, etc--for someone making $8/hr, $320/wk for 40 hours (if he can get them)--$16,000/annum.

You can't live on that, and forcing people to try is going to lead to disastrous results.

The solution to this is not found in oily, un-informed, and snarly quips.

This is a real problem which requires real thought, which should preclude it from being discussed on this forum and in the above manner.
Another glib retort from the conservative warrior ... (show quote)


Yeah - let's keep this conversation in bars and taverns where it belongs.

The standard for a certain wage is not and should not be "how much does the employee need". It should be based on "how much does the employee contribute to the economy of the employer."

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 12:23:16   #
ted45 Loc: Delaware
 
Twardlow wrote:
Another glib retort from the conservative warrior and enforcer who is very impressed with what he thinks.

Of course, the retort isn't very good, is it?

Folks, the disappearing middle class is an important issue. People who make a million dollars a month plus stock options pay those who labor seven or eight dollars an hour.

Estimate a budget --housing, auto and insurance, health insurance, food, etc--for someone making $8/hr, $320/wk for 40 hours (if he can get them)--$16,000/annum.

You can't live on that, and forcing people to try is going to lead to disastrous results.

The solution to this is not found in oily, un-informed, and snarly quips.

This is a real problem which requires real thought, which should preclude it from being discussed on this forum and in the above manner.
Another glib retort from the conservative warrior ... (show quote)



I suppose your "The solution to this is not found in oily, un-informed, and snarly quips." is the proper way to discuss the subject?


We have always had low paid people living on wages that others feel are below living standards. The problem is that there are some people that do not want a small palace to live in and two cars in the heated/air conditioned garage. Who are you to dictate to someone else what their standard of living should be.

The market place works; if people did not take the low paying jobs flipping burgers then the burger places would have to pay more to attract workers. It really is that simple.

Reply
 
 
Jan 1, 2014 12:24:01   #
Twardlow Loc: Arkansas
 
autofocus wrote:
No, the middle class is disappearing and will continue to do so because that's part of the plan. The plan; more and more people beholden to the government for their very survival = more people who will continue to vote and support the liberal left ideology. Also, the middle class is taking it in the shorts in more ways than one. The rich, and the uber rich will always have wealth and will always be able to support their lifestyle regardless of social, and wealth redistribution programs of the government. Plus, it is that group, regardless of what you think of them, that is paying the lion's share of the taxes in this country. The poor, and very poor on the other hand, pay no taxes and their life is fully subsidized by the government by virtue of welfare, food stamps, free cell phones, and more! So, that leaves the middle class who, as a group, are paying taxes. However, there are many other regressive taxes that they are paying that are sorely eating into their disposable income. The rich could care less if fuel to heat their house(s) costs $3.75 gal, or because of various regulations, union demands, and minimum wage increases that a loaf of bread now costs $4.50 instead of the $2.00 it should cost...who is footing this burden every day of their lives, but the obvious middle class.
No, the middle class is disappearing and will cont... (show quote)




The non-rational, emotional plea of an uninformed mind. Not being snarly, just pointing out. It does no good to flail against generalizations and your own simplicities.

Agree with your final thought, except the middle class is disappearing.

Soon we will have only the very rich and the very poor.

Remember France? They had a revolution.

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 12:25:31   #
Schwabo Loc: Florida
 
autofocus wrote:
Ever think of running for public office? If it were possible, you'd certainly have my vote!!
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


ditto, I will vote for you as well.

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 12:26:25   #
Twardlow Loc: Arkansas
 
wilpharm wrote:
well, shucks,foilks…Im impressed with what Blurry thinks, too…He is right on today, as usual..




Please re-read anti-penultimate statement on the solution, as I posted it.

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 12:27:06   #
Schwabo Loc: Florida
 
Twardlow wrote:
The non-rational, emotional plea of an uninformed mind. Not being snarly, just pointing out. It does no good to flail against generalizations and your own simplicities.

Agree with your final thought, except the middle class is disappearing.

Soon we will have only the very rich and the very poor.

Remember France? They had a revolution.


Yeah and look where they are now.

Reply
 
 
Jan 1, 2014 12:28:29   #
Twardlow Loc: Arkansas
 
PrairieSeasons wrote:
Yeah - let's keep this conversation in bars and taverns where it belongs.

The standard for a certain wage is not and should not be "how much does the employee need". It should be based on "how much does the employee contribute to the economy of the employer."




Strike "of the employer."

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 12:41:04   #
PrairieSeasons Loc: Red River of the North
 
Twardlow wrote:
Strike "of the employer."


Either way - the answer is the same.

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 12:41:46   #
FRENCHY Loc: Stone Mountain , Ga
 
Schwabo wrote:
Yeah and look where they are now.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 12:43:49   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
Gnslngr wrote:
I am so sick of this meme in today's society - the unions died because they were bad. Simply not true.

Unions died because they union busted - and big business had taken over a government that was supposed to stop that. Sure, there was corruption - there is in religious organizations - but that didn't bring them down. Big business did.


Have you heard about Detroit?The condition of California?
Oregon?How about teachers unions in general.

Reply
 
 
Jan 1, 2014 12:53:23   #
autofocus Loc: North Central Connecticut
 
ted45 wrote:

The market place works; if people did not take the low paying jobs flipping burgers then the burger places would have to pay more to attract workers. It really is that simple.


Once we get to the point that salary demands on Mickey D and others like it reach unaffordability we will see that robots can make burgers start to finish more efficiently and economically than the now "low paid" burger flipper. Will we then hear outcrys from them wishing they had their minimum wage jobs back again? If you force employers to do this because of all the demands put on them it will, and can be a reality. All you have to do is look at all the robotics now being used in the auto industry, and probably for the same reasons

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 13:04:15   #
ebbote Loc: Hockley, Texas
 
Yes it was enough but barely, used car, small apt.

SteveR wrote:
I have to question whether $2.32 was enough for an apartment and a car in 1965. In 1967 or 68 I worked as a laborer for the City of Pontiac on a Park and Recreation crew. I was entry level and made $2.78/hr. I lived at home and borrowed my parents car. Believe me, I was not rolling in dough.

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 13:28:43   #
GAClowers Loc: Tacoma, Washington
 
Gnslngr wrote:
Wow. Let me guess: you skipped history in school and went straight into Propaganda of the Wealthy 101, right?



Using your usual stupid arguments I see. Let's see. We still have all those great textile mills, tire manufacturers, steel mills, etc. The auto manufactures are doing great too. In Mexico, Brazil and other foreign locations. How many Fords are built here now. Why do you think they all left? The cities that they used to support are looking great too.

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 13:30:27   #
rrforster12 Loc: Leesburg Florida
 
Unions and mandated Minimum Wage laws are legalized price-Fixing mechanism's, and as such, are anti-consumer and the base cause of inflation. In the real-world marketplace there will always be relative winners and losers. There is always a price to pay to become a "winner". Education, and relevant experience are the usual rungs upward, but 10 years of tightening a lug on an assembly line is really only a multiple of the 2 or 3 weeks it took to learn where the tools are and the toilet and lunchroom are to successfully fill that spot on the line. Artificially setting some arbitrary price for labor only serves to raise the price of whatever that industry is producing. It follows that as the price of any product rises, the desirability of it to the masses diminishes unless there is a compensating increase in value. It's generally known as "pricing yourself out of the market". Why is almost everything we see in the appliance market, the clothing market etc are imports from other countries?.....because its less expensive and the value is perceived as equal to, or better then U.S. produced product.
It's the marketplace at work in a free market. There are only 3 ways to change this eventuality. Build a significantly more valuable product, build a equal product at a very competitive price, or have the government prohibit the importation of foreign built product (or services). Where is the "value added" feature of mandated minimum wage laws, or for that matter, mandated Union Rules?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.