Horseart wrote:
Now, here's honesty...I would never in a million years talk to anyone like I thought they were stupid or try to belittle anyone, but that's just me.
So you read secret messages where none existed. That post was only 100% technical. Anything that made you think otherwise is only from inside you. The post only defined your simple mistake and obvious solution. What you overlooked. Nothing in that belittles you. That also should be obvious.
Now if I want to belittle you, I will say so in a blunt three word sentence. As honest people do. No decent person uses innuendo or secret meanings. None were or are in anything I have posted. Not a single sentence insults you. You cannot even quote one. And if it did, any honest person ignores it as irrelevant to the technical discussion the context.
Apparently you have even confused a reference to others as if also you. Others are everyone but you unless I say so bluntly and otherwise. Your name was not listed with others. So you have zero logical reasons to assume it.
Many older people get angry too much ego when their bad diagnostic procedure is explained. Now, did I call you old? If biased or emotional, then you assumed yes. Assumptions that insult honest people. I said you are not old and not young if you read that sentence as written. You have zero reasons to believe that sentence says anything about you even if you are old. But based upon our history, you probably jump to that conclusion anyway. Did I say you jumped to that conclusion? Yes if you did not read what I posted. No if you finally understand the difference between reading what is posted verses reading with innuendo. See that word 'probably'? Did you grasp its significance?
Simple. If it belittles you, then you did not read what was written.
OK. So maybe you can go back and read that post to learn what it really says. But again, that means you must read in context - only what is obviously relevant and 100% technical.
You were using bad diagnostics procedures - also called shotgunning. And starved your best help of facts. So you are frustrated (as most anyone would be). And you admit to being exhausted. What you were doing will often create your confusion.
Did I just belittle you again? No. You made mistakes that a majority of people do. (Now how do you read that sentence: that you were emotional or that you used shotgunning? Which way did you read that sentence? Using what I said or what you assume I said?) Does that reality belittle you? If it does, well, again being honest, I dont care. I provided your best answer. And can do nothing if you insert your biases into what I wrote.
See that second sentence? Intentionally written so you would see maybe three different interpretations. Now reread it in context - 100% technical. Nothing more.
Your post says you included your emotions and biases into what I posted. Therefore read something completely different from what I wrote. You have zero reasons to believe anything was belittling if you read with the honesty and context used to write it.