Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Wide angle lenses
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jan 3, 2012 19:32:47   #
machiasman Loc: Snohomish,WA
 
Stumbled on a sight called pixel-peeper. Pretty cool sight type in the lense your interested in and up pops photos using it and what camera they were using

Reply
Jan 4, 2012 06:40:59   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
machiasman wrote:
Was wondering, where i could go to learn about wide angle lenses.


When you narrow your search, look for online reviews.

Reply
Jan 4, 2012 07:25:26   #
sbesaw Loc: Boston
 
I have both a crop sensor and full Frame Body (7000 & D3s) On the crop frame I use the Tokina 11-16, previously referenced in this post. It is everything everyone says it is and you can't find a bad review. I believe it to be the best wide angle for the price. On the FX, full frame body I shoot with the Nikon 14-24 2.8. that is a remarkable lens......

Reply
 
 
Jan 4, 2012 09:17:10   #
George H Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
machiasman wrote:
Was wondering, where i could go to learn about wide angle lenses.


Machiasman,
Look at Utube, they have videos on almost everything.

George

Reply
Jan 4, 2012 10:28:03   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
I have the Canon 10-22mm zoom wide angle and it works really well. They sell for about $700 new but you can pick one up that has been taken care of for around $500. I think that is what I paid for mine.

Reply
Jan 4, 2012 10:50:19   #
mdorn Loc: Portland, OR
 
machiasman wrote:
Using a rebal T1i


I'll save you a lot of time... If you want the very best wide angle lens out there for your camera:

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM (between $700 - $800)

Reply
Jan 4, 2012 12:08:00   #
dlwhawaii Loc: Sunny Wailuku, Hawaii
 
Have been using the Sigma 15mm. Gives me a very wide FOV, but doesn't give me the fisheye look. Just finished taking some Wide Angle shots of Waikiki from the Queen's Beach pier and no distortion at all. Need to do some PP to get rid of some of the tourists in the water and then play with HDR. One of my two favorite lenses.

Reply
 
 
Jan 4, 2012 12:08:05   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
I have a Nikon and bought a Tamron 10-24. I like the flexibility, but after reading the reviews I should have bought the Nikon 10-24. My other major lens is the Nikon 28-300, so these two lenses cover my needs nicely.

Reply
Jan 4, 2012 12:11:17   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
P.S. Read Ken Rockwell's reviews before buying. Also, you may be able to purchase a refurbished or used lens and save some money.

Reply
Jan 4, 2012 12:11:56   #
grassroots
 
check out digital-picture reviews for lenses and cameras

Reply
Jan 4, 2012 14:09:33   #
machiasman Loc: Snohomish,WA
 
thanks for all the replies all good responses!

Reply
 
 
Jan 4, 2012 14:14:23   #
eaudirsc Loc: Virginia
 
If you have any of the canon 1.6 sensor cameras take a look at the canon EF-S 10-22. I have one that I've used on my Canon 30d 50d & now 60d.Usually priced in the 700.00 range. Really good image quality and build quality.

Reply
Jan 4, 2012 15:15:42   #
PNagy Loc: Missouri City, Texas
 
If you have one, use it. Experience is the best teacher. If you don't, but have access to an SLR, as your letter implies, rent one. Other than that, a small number of authors is often recommended for general photography guidance. My recommendation is Scott Kelby.

Reply
Jan 4, 2012 17:08:17   #
bvargas Loc: Palm Harbor, Florida
 
18-55MM, IS NOT A WIDE ANGLE LENS, WHEN YOU CONSIDER CROP FACTOR OF 1.6 ON CANON OR 1.5 ON NIKON, MAKING THESE ABOUT 28MM ON CANON OR 27MM ON NIKON. CONSIDER INSTEAD ANYTHING AROUND 10MM OR 12MM, STARTING POINT.
BVARGAS

Reply
Jan 4, 2012 17:25:12   #
melphoto60
 
machiasman wrote:
My wife bought me a bunch of lenses not knowing what she was getting.None of them fit not sure how much she paid for them. but also have to maybe find a place where i could trade them for a wide angle or sell them.Jusr collecting dust on the box here don't know if their just junk either theirs a samigon 2.0 X video telephoto high resoulution AF,Kenloc-Mc-tor1;4.5 80- 200, kenloc1;2.8 135mm, kenlock1;2.8 35mm i beleive their for a film not digital Don't fit my camera anyway wrong mount


looks like a bunch of junk. look at tokina 11-16 f2.8 canon's 10-22 f3.5-4.5, tamron has a 10-24 f3.5-4.5, and sigma has a 10-20 f3.5

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.