Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Help deciding on a smaller camera for every day use
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
Jul 29, 2013 13:48:13   #
alissaspieces Loc: New York
 
I would like to be able to achieve shots like these with a smaller camera. Am I misguided in thinking that I would be able to?







Reply
Jul 29, 2013 13:48:13   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
alissaspieces wrote:
Yup...I am just trying to decide if I can afford it. Thanks! Do you use the Lx7 creatively at work? Do you get a professional look to your pics?


As a designer, I end up shooting our final product (signs) for our marketing department. The environment maybe interior or exterior, most of the time a flash can't be used due to reflective vinyl use.

Creative, not really, but we need nice shots, which this camera does. I used to haul my personal gear with me, but I've got way to much to carry with me besides excess camera gear.

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 13:51:15   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
you should be able to do that.

Reply
 
 
Jul 29, 2013 13:58:07   #
young Loc: California
 
I love the Lumix (my husband uses it now, ditching his Nikon D80) and used it on several trips, but the slow shutter speed frustrated me when you want to grab a shot as the tour bus drives past. I also had a Canon S100 which my husband got me - loved it too, but again, slow shutter speed. I think it's worth the price to be able to get once-in-a-lifetime pictures.

To show the shutter speed.
To show the shutter speed....

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 14:03:55   #
alissaspieces Loc: New York
 
Cdouthitt wrote:
you should be able to do that.

Do you love your E-PM2? Would that be more what I am looking for?

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 14:04:48   #
alissaspieces Loc: New York
 
young wrote:
I love the Lumix (my husband uses it now, ditching his Nikon D80) and used it on several trips, but the slow shutter speed frustrated me when you want to grab a shot as the tour bus drives past. I also had a Canon S100 which my husband got me - loved it too, but again, slow shutter speed. I think it's worth the price to be able to get once-in-a-lifetime pictures.


So you think the Sony is a better option?

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 14:11:26   #
young Loc: California
 
It's costly, but metal body, and Sony tends to upgrade every year. The next model Sony RX100 II has wifi, and more. Check them out. I'm saving up for the Sony with small body, manual option, raw, and interchangeable lens. That's a Wow.

Reply
 
 
Jul 29, 2013 15:44:36   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
Yes, I love the EPM2, especially if you are into prime lenses...however, the Rx-100, Lx-7, and XZ-2 are all smaller. than it, and you get a retractable lens.

As to the EPM2, the 20mm lives on it, with occasional use from the 45mm. Both lenses are fast and bright. I'd love to add the 9-18, 25 and 75mm, but then I think, scratch that, I know my wife would divorce me :-)

Panasonic is releasing a Gx-7 in the coming month, which looks very promising.

This was just one of my favorite shots taken with it...
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-105290-1.html

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 16:02:31   #
Himat Loc: Toronto
 
Check Sony RX 100 you might like it!

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 16:18:12   #
bunuweld Loc: Arizona
 
young wrote:
It's costly, but metal body, and Sony tends to upgrade every year. The next model Sony RX100 II has wifi, and more. Check them out. I'm saving up for the Sony with small body, manual option, raw, and interchangeable lens. That's a Wow.


The Sony RX100 II has two major improvements over the earlier version: A tilting LCD screen and a multi-interface hot shoe that can accept, among other things, an electronic viewfinder. These to me are major improvements in addition to some other less important ones. If I didn't already have the earlier version, I would jump on this one immediatelly.

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 16:36:59   #
TonyB Loc: Cornwall UK
 
I agree with FarmerJim, the Fuji X10 is a wonderful camera it has full manual controls and shoots raw as well as auto and Jpegs. The sensor is 2/3" and has exr capabilities and takes excellent images. Maybe a little large for a shirt pocket but will fit easily into a jacket pocket.

Reply
 
 
Jul 29, 2013 17:42:50   #
Ghspalding Loc: Georgia
 
Might not be sized for what you are wanting and a bit pricey but the Fuji Film x100s is incredible and the IQ rivals a lot of DSLR. Great manual shooting and otc Jpeg are stellar. Can shoot RAW but its not a must, thus no PP needed. I don't use my Nikon DSLR much anymore.

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 18:05:02   #
alissaspieces Loc: New York
 
Cdouthitt wrote:
Yes, I love the EPM2, especially if you are into prime lenses...however, the Rx-100, Lx-7, and XZ-2 are all smaller. than it, and you get a retractable lens.

As to the EPM2, the 20mm lives on it, with occasional use from the 45mm. Both lenses are fast and bright. I'd love to add the 9-18, 25 and 75mm, but then I think, scratch that, I know my wife would divorce me :-)

Panasonic is releasing a Gx-7 in the coming month, which looks very promising.
Lol- I understand the need for more photo equipment...and I am a newbie! lol That is a gorgeous shot! I was looking through your pictures and you have such nice shots! I especially love the airplane one! Amazing!
This was just one of my favorite shots taken with it...
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-105290-1.html
Yes, I love the EPM2, especially if you are into p... (show quote)

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 20:33:22   #
John Lawrence
 
I found myself in the same situation as you. I've got a great Nikon DSLR with several lenses but wanted something small that would take great pictures I could take with me all the time. I found my answer with the new Nikon Coolpix A. It has a large sensor and takes outstanding pictures. It has a 28mm prime lens so you'll need to decide how that works for you. It's also a bit pricey ($1096.00). It would be worth your while to at least look at one before making your final decision. It's a great little camera.

Reply
Jul 29, 2013 20:33:23   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
As to your earlier post about only having LR...95% of my editing is done through LR...only when I'm doing HDR's (or a lot of cloning out) do I step into photoshop...but there's no reason you can't do that in elements, or something else less expensive.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.