RE Loc: California

Wow, great shots...the flowers just pop off the screen! :thumbup: :thumbup:

Ronbo Loc: Okanagan falls BC. Canada

Thanks very much RE and thanks for looking...

levijudah Loc: Fayetteville, NC

I agree with Angler . . ."almost 3D"
So much so, I think my allergies are
kicking back in :oops:

Ronbo Loc: Okanagan falls BC. Canada

LOL. Cheers...

mooseeyes Loc: Sonora, California

These are all very nice images. If you seek to improve upon near perfection, that is the nature of some of us, and certainly a credit to yourself. A natural trait of an artist.

Well done.

Ronbo Loc: Okanagan falls BC. Canada

Thanks for the kind comments mooseeyes and thanks for looking.
Cheers...

Pictxterowner 3 D sbs

Processing 3 D sbs photos I have this often as an unwanted result of a miner focus change between pictures.

With only two different pictures side by side the desired effect of stacking is achieved when I cross my eyes and overlap the two photos. It makes it very clear why stacking does work very well. I still see the photo in 3 D but without the stacking process being already done by a computer program it is extra work on the vision.
The moon is my most successful use of stacking manually using my brain and only two photos to make a 3 d photo. The difference in the colors has no value. I could not find two different pictures of the moon exactly the same color on demand.
The Purple flowers when overlapped by my eyes can see more of the field of focus, one photo is focused further back. It reminds me that I do see double the pixels while viewing a 3D sbs photos.
That does not mean I like or dislike the photo. It's just easy for me to adjust to viewing multiple fields at the same time.

two moon exposures,differnet times


Two different focus fields