Starr wrote:
Please help. The last two events I photographed were held in rooms that were all wood - walls, floors, ceiling and furniture. I had a terrible time getting any photos to work out. There was nothing to bounce my external flash off of so pictures turned out too dark. My ISO was at 1600/3200 and metered my camera but still the colors were all off. I spent way too much time in post processing. Any suggestions?
Hi Starr,
I know this thread is kind of being beat to death . . . but here is my take on your images AND on some of the advice given.
I would like to say that the answer to your dilemma is not the great efforts of those that have done some post processing for you here. Your question had to do with preventing the same result happening again, and as you said, you spent far too much time already in post.
First you say "there was nothing to bounce your external flash off."
Why bounce? Millions of flash units have been sold that do not have a swivel/tilting head and were never designed to bounce . . and these units have created many beautiful images.
Bounce flash should only be used under very ideal conditions, like white or light, neutral colored walls and ceilings, smallish rooms, and careful placement of the subject. A strong flash, custom white balance setting and relatively fast lens are also recommended highly. If you bounce your flash from a black/dark wall it is like turning off your flash.
Unless you have greatly cropped your images, they appear to be taken within ten feet from the camera. At ten feet even the dreaded pop-up flash would expose the subjects properly, even in a black-walled room at 400 ISO . . . horrible light . . but non the less properly exposed.
So let's analyze what the real solution is for this situation . . . and let's try to establish a solution that is consistent with all conditions.
1) Because bounce flash is dependent on:
a) color of walls and ceilings
b) darkness of walls and ceilings
c) height of ceiling
d) size of room
e) distance the flash is from the wall
f) distance the subject is from the wall
g) angle the flash is bouncing back to the subject
h) etc. . . .
. . . . get the picture? No consistency . . . bad idea without much planning and absolute understanding of your equipment limitations and ability.
2) Now that we get the "bounce idea" out of the way, use the flash the way it was designed to be used . . . pointing at the subject! A simple manual camera setting of 400 ISO . . . 1/200th of a second shutter and F/4.5 . . . with a flash capable of ETTL will produce perfect flash exposure over 90% of the time within the power capabilities of your flash. Exposure "tweaking" can easily be done with the FEC /flash exposure compensation on your camera. If you don't know where that is or how to use it, it is very possible that is one of the causes of your badly underexposed images above. Without your knowledge it could be set at a minus setting. Check it out.
3) The settings above will assure consistent flash exposure under most conditions from small, light colored rooms, to out doors in the dark.
The next step is to improve the quality of the light from the harsh, flat lighting produced by the on-camera direct flash. Two things will eliminate the harsh, flat lighting. Get the flash OFF the camera, and add a good flash modifier that does waste light and does not depend on light bouncing back from other surfaces to work.
The Stefan, Gary Fong Light Sphere and other modifiers that throw light in all directions are light wasters and are only effective under a very few ideal circumstances. Goofy Newfie's recommendation is a good one. With his experience in photography, why not use what he uses?
My only other suggestion is, that to take the stress out of learning flash photography, for heaven' sake do the learning with some fun shoots with a girlfriend . . . not at an event where someone is depending on your results.
Hope that helps . . .