jenny wrote:
Yes, Silver, i think you covered that very well. And i think
you would probably agree that, attending one or another
lace of learning in person, you would probably wind up
rating them as to quality. Somehow i hoped to make a point
that paying for something may be worthwhile and the specific
school Stephie mentioned is a whole lot better than a lot of
others that make claims to provide good instruction. As you
more or less pointed out,no school, and no high end camera will make a person a photographer. Those who really want to
learn will get there. In pursuing this subject i was reminded of many well-known names of the 20th century..some
were fortunate enough to be their assistants. There are so
many of us now though,every household has a camera. It would
still be valuable to be an assistant to someone with good
knowledge to share. We have to find good knowledge wherever
we can. Unfortunately the word "automatic" is and has been
kicked around since Eastman claimed all one had to do was click a shutter. Too many think these days they can do great
things pushing a button without thought. Happy holidays to all!
Yes, Silver, i think you covered that very well. A... (
show quote)
Jenny, Stephie didnt mention any school. Somebody else mentioned a school. I still stand by the premise that mail order schools are not what they advertise that they are. The courses are superficial at best and they are not cheap. All of the knowledge that one receives in these courses can be found in good photography books.