Freakin Liberals! The insanity of the left on full display.
Jun 1, 2013 11:15:26 #
JBTaylor
Loc: In hiding again
ole sarg wrote:
I think Croce spoke too soon. Calvert County voted republican in the last election!
Seems it is those crazy conservatives are to blame!
Seems it is those crazy conservatives are to blame!
What does that have to do with anything? What semblance of logic could you even begin to be using for such a dumb statement? Did they change out the administration and staff of the school as a result of an election?
To put in a way that even you would understand, why would "gun nuts" grill a little kid for 2 hours over a mere toy gun?
Jun 1, 2013 11:15:34 #
Jun 1, 2013 11:38:24 #
travelwp wrote:
travelwp wrote:Really? Wouldn't it be the teacher or principal , who didn't call the parents immediately and who grilled the kid for 2 hours?
Please suggest a relationship the teacher/principal had that would warrant grilling a 5 year old kid for two hours about a cap pistol.
Please suggest a relationship the teacher/principal had that would warrant grilling a 5 year old kid for two hours about a cap pistol.
A re-read of the WP article would be in order. The boy was not grilled for two hours. Assuming the truthfulness of the authorities and the boy's mother, he was questioned for five to seven minutes. The mother claims that it was over two hours before she was notified about the incident.
Jun 1, 2013 11:40:04 #
Blurryeyed wrote:
What a stupid thing to say.
Yes. I wonder if they voted that way to try to head off more proliferation of this sort of nonsense.
Jun 1, 2013 12:23:50 #
FRED1 wrote:
Your hatred of any thing government and the opportunity to pick on liberals and California is well known but in your right wing excitement slow down and get your facts straight that happened in Maryland not Calif. You can spin it but you're a hater plain and simple.
Yes, but I was referring to an incident of a middle school student who beat the crap out of her teacher, and was lightly punished, I probably was a little confused, maybe she did get a couple of days suspension but nothing more. Then California comes out with the law linked below which is very vague in its definition of willful defiance...
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-lausd-suspensions-20130515,0,442761.story
BTW, I don't hate California, I actually think that it is a beautiful state with much to offer. My only worry about California is that they work their way out of their own mess. They can run their state anyway they see fit as long as they do not burden the rest of us with promises that they could not keep.
Jun 1, 2013 12:42:39 #
Blurryeyed wrote:
Just don't like the obvious do you? There are seve... (show quote)
Ouch!! Richard, do you have ANY idea how thoroughly and utterly you just got bitch-slapped? HaHaHa! ...HA!!
Jun 1, 2013 13:00:30 #
I s this another Daily Caller story? One source said theis took place in Maryland another said California. The least they cold do is get the location right,
Jun 1, 2013 13:02:28 #
ole sarg wrote:
I think Croce spoke too soon. Calvert County voted republican in the last election!
Seems it is those crazy conservatives are to blame!
Seems it is those crazy conservatives are to blame!
Croce? CROCE??!!! HaHaHa! The onset of dementia is SO sad, huh? Say something else, please.... =D
Jun 1, 2013 13:30:26 #
FrumCA wrote:
A re-read of the WP article would be in order. The boy was not grilled for two hours. Assuming the truthfulness of the authorities and the boy's mother, he was questioned for five to seven minutes. The mother claims that it was over two hours before she was notified about the incident.
"A reread of the WP article would be in order."
Could someone else please reread the article.
I can not find "he was questioned for five to seven minutes."
Jun 1, 2013 14:21:07 #
FrumCA wrote:
A re-read of the WP article would be in order. The boy was not grilled for two hours.
I did re-read the article and here is what it said:
"The child was questioned for more than two hours before his mother was called, she said, adding that he uncharacteristically wet his pants during the episode. The boy is 5 all bugs and frogs and cowboys, his mother said."
Jun 1, 2013 14:23:11 #
richard-sports wrote:
Blurry brain would be a much better name for you.
cameraniac wrote:
Dick would be a much better one for you.
:lol:
Jun 1, 2013 14:23:30 #
travelwp wrote:
I did re-read the article and here is what it said:
"The child was questioned for more than two hours before his mother was called, she said, adding that he uncharacteristically wet his pants during the episode. The boy is 5 all bugs and frogs and cowboys, his mother said."
"The child was questioned for more than two hours before his mother was called, she said, adding that he uncharacteristically wet his pants during the episode. The boy is 5 all bugs and frogs and cowboys, his mother said."
I wonder just what kind of questions one could ask for two hours of a five year old with a cap gun? Sounds like it was more of a 2 hour abuse session to me... What the hell did they think the five year old might have to say about his cap gun?
Jun 1, 2013 14:42:49 #
FrumCA wrote:
A re-read of the WP article would be in order. The boy was not grilled for two hours. Assuming the truthfulness of the authorities and the boy's mother, he was questioned for five to seven minutes. The mother claims that it was over two hours before she was notified about the incident.
travelwp wrote
I did re-read the article and here is what it said:
"The child was questioned for more than two hours before his mother was called, she said, adding that he uncharacteristically wet his pants during the episode. The boy is 5 all bugs and frogs and cowboys, his mother said."[/quote]
Thanks.
As long as we are making stuff up :?:
"He was handcuffed and strip searched too."
Some people don't think we will check.
A re-read of the WP article would be in order. The boy was not grilled for two hours. Assuming the truthfulness of the authorities and the boy's mother, he was questioned for five to seven minutes. The mother claims that it was over two hours before she was notified about the incident.
travelwp wrote
I did re-read the article and here is what it said:
"The child was questioned for more than two hours before his mother was called, she said, adding that he uncharacteristically wet his pants during the episode. The boy is 5 all bugs and frogs and cowboys, his mother said."[/quote]
Thanks.
As long as we are making stuff up :?:
"He was handcuffed and strip searched too."
Some people don't think we will check.
Jun 1, 2013 14:53:37 #
rfmaude41
Loc: Lancaster, Texas (DFW area)
rook2c4 wrote:
Another typical half-truth over-sensationalized Washington Post story.
Questioned for two straight hours? Really? According to whom, the parents? The Post conveniently ommits naming the source, as it would turn this into a non-story: a kid brings a mock gun to school, aims it a fellow students, is separated from the rest of the student body, and the parents are called. Nothing unusual.
Questioned for two straight hours? Really? According to whom, the parents? The Post conveniently ommits naming the source, as it would turn this into a non-story: a kid brings a mock gun to school, aims it a fellow students, is separated from the rest of the student body, and the parents are called. Nothing unusual.
According to one from a different source, the kid was "arrested" (so to speek) at 8:35, and his mother was not called until about 10:30; do the math
Jun 1, 2013 14:57:13 #
Blurryeyed wrote:
I wonder just what kind of questions one could ask for two hours of a five year old with a cap gun? Sounds like it was more of a 2 hour abuse session to me... What the hell did they think the five year old might have to say about his cap gun?
I couldn't agree more !
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.