Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
Only photos right out of the camera
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Dec 12, 2011 18:03:01   #
snowbear
 
shadow1284 wrote:
Not quite sure what that intails. I have a lot of input I can make to my Canon to adjust the the picture in-camera. Mostly I shoot in Natural and or in RAW. I select the best and compose them in canon PPD and PSPx3. Works for me but everyone has their own technique that works for them.


The challenge is no PP. Try raw, then convert directly to jpeg or shoot straight to jpeg. The camera or the computer is doing some minimal processing in creating the jpeg, but I would call it negligible (wink - see posts by dfalk and myself above). Turn off all the in-camera enhancements and concentrate on subject, composition and exposure. I'm not trying to be argumentative towards anyone, just stating what seems to be the point of the thread.

Patw28 - if it seems like I've hijacked it, I am sorry. this is a good idea, thank you for coming up with it.

Reply
Dec 12, 2011 18:03:50   #
lawana
 
straight out of the camera -







Reply
Dec 12, 2011 19:39:08   #
the_imaginist Loc: St. Louis, MO
 
I was out the other day shooting some things and saw these. I knew what I was trying to get... some of these berries in focus along with some really clear blue sky, and then just let the rest of everything else fall in or out of focus. My only problem was the sun was so bright I couldn't watch the camera display since I was shooting on Auto. I ended up with a couple I liked. JPEG right out of the camera.



Reply
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Dec 12, 2011 19:43:22   #
RiverNan Loc: Eastern Pa
 
went on a canal path hike...straight out of camera







Reply
Dec 12, 2011 21:23:12   #
ianhargraves1066 Loc: NEW SMYRNA BEACH, Florida
 
snowbear wrote:
dfalk wrote:
For the folks shooting RAW that would be kind of like hanging a negative up for viewing. :-D

I guess you could past a text dump of the data.

Now that I really think about it, the film was processed outside the camera, so I should have scanned a frame of undeveloped film. :wink:

OP: laugh - it's all in good fun.




Major problem, happened to me many times, developing a film in the camera makes it wet and soggy and out side it fogs the film anyway so you dont have to dev it anyway!!


Shows your one of US a real dev and print photographer.

Ian
Ian

Reply
Dec 12, 2011 21:24:37   #
ianhargraves1066 Loc: NEW SMYRNA BEACH, Florida
 
rivernan wrote:
went on a canal path hike...straight out of camera


Great photographs and a wonderful opportunity for an ambulance chasing lawyer. Those ratchets look mighty sharp!!! The photos are pretty good. Love the bike shot, great perspective and tone range.

Ian

Reply
Dec 12, 2011 21:26:53   #
ianhargraves1066 Loc: NEW SMYRNA BEACH, Florida
 
shadow1284 wrote:
I would guess that HDR merging is out of question too. Except I don't know how to get all the details of a highly contrasted image with just one shot. Do you have any not PP that fits the question. I,m not being argumenitive. it's just that a finished photograph is something a photographer has created to his or her perfection. If PP was used to create that perfection then it's part of the picture taking process. Much the same as what the camera might do internally to reproduce what you are creating.
I would guess that HDR merging is out of question ... (show quote)


WOW says it all.

Ian

Reply
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Dec 13, 2011 11:34:36   #
shariseyes Loc: South Glens Falls, ny
 
I can rally appreciat this topic, living in the Adirondack, i've had such beautiful back drops. Ihad no desire to edit or photo shop pics. When I got Corel and realized how one can improve pics, lets just say my eyes have been opened. thanks for this opportunity.



Reply
Dec 13, 2011 11:40:28   #
shariseyes Loc: South Glens Falls, ny
 
Here is a new friend I caught the other day, unedited too.



Reply
Dec 13, 2011 11:48:34   #
joe_flippin Loc: Texan living in Brazil, SA
 
Out of the camera in NC.







Reply
Dec 13, 2011 12:12:23   #
glen123 Loc: Tacoma Wa
 
A couple from Mexico

Mazatlan
Mazatlan...

Cabo
Cabo...

Reply
 
 
Dec 13, 2011 22:15:26   #
Ta1on Loc: Michigan City, IN
 
Straight out of the camera



Reply
Dec 13, 2011 22:24:11   #
nyweb2001
 
Patw28 wrote:
Inspired by NYWEB . . . .
How about a thread for only those that come straight out of the camera?
No post processing here!
Surely that would sharpen our vision and skills.


Geez....I'm late and the thread has my name on it !! Ok....here's one I took a few days ago in the back yard and didn't adjust anything yet......



Reply
Dec 13, 2011 22:43:05   #
martinfisherphoto Loc: Lake Placid Florida
 
a few from Costa Rica. Waterfalls might be a little crooked, and dark but out of camera.









Reply
Dec 13, 2011 23:16:20   #
Laura'sImages
 
Here you go one of my favorites Limpkin~Angled the camera down to capture the water to use as a background~



Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.