Universal Background Checks
Apr 21, 2013 14:44:44 #
Bangee5 wrote:
They didn't ask the right questions because it would be politically incorrect to do so. Obama Admin. had tied their hands. And that is just plain arrogant, ignorant, and self serving!
And you know this for a fact how? I don't like Obama either but I do know correct procedure
Apr 21, 2013 15:28:22 #
Bangee5 wrote:
They didn't ask the right questions because it would be politically incorrect to do so. Obama Admin. had tied their hands. And that is just plain arrogant, ignorant, and self serving!
Please cite your source for this.
Apr 21, 2013 15:49:08 #
Apr 21, 2013 16:12:22 #
Bangee5 wrote:
FOX
Fox is not a credible source as it has an agenda. Much like MSNBC on the other side.
Apr 21, 2013 17:00:51 #
KW Conch wrote:
Fox is not a credible source as it has an agenda. Much like MSNBC on the other side.
I find Fox Cable News a very credible source for news. It is my choice for the news. It is not what you like or dislike that matters, you don't control my life nor my beliefs.
Hope we can still be friends.
Apr 21, 2013 17:07:01 #
I completely agree with the President.There should be "background checks". To set as a good example, I think we should start with him.
Apr 21, 2013 17:11:15 #
dourob wrote:
I completely agree with the President.There should be "background checks". To set as a good example, I think we should start with him.
You hit a home run!
No news media should be believed I. It's entirety the major networks are worst in regards to agenda. Fox tends to be more conservative. Read between the lines and arrive at your own conclusions. This directed at banges I. His tunnel vision vision
Apr 21, 2013 17:18:56 #
Apr 21, 2013 17:46:57 #
Bangee5 wrote:
I find Fox Cable News a very credible source for news. It is my choice for the news. It is not what you like or dislike that matters, you don't control my life nor my beliefs.
Hope we can still be friends.
Hope we can still be friends.
Absolutely, we can still be friends. I try to listen to all sides, including Fox, and make up my mind on each issue.
We live in a free society with all points of view available. I just put less credence on a source that promotes one point of view over all others on a continual basis. :)
Apr 21, 2013 17:47:52 #
donrent wrote:
An Universial Check is already possible - its all on your drivers license...
All the laws needed are already exist - if they're used...
All the laws needed are already exist - if they're used...
Agreed...let's just enforce them.
Apr 21, 2013 17:50:12 #
dourob wrote:
I completely agree with the President.There should be "background checks". To set as a good example, I think we should start with him.
I don't think that any president has been subject to more scrutiny than Obama. It's just that those of you who don't like him are never satisfied with the answers. :(
Apr 21, 2013 18:35:28 #
sundancer2004 wrote:
You hit a home run!
No news media should be believed I. It's entirety the major networks are worst in regards to agenda. Fox tends to be more conservative. Read between the lines and arrive at your own conclusions. This directed at banges I. His tunnel vision vision
No news media should be believed I. It's entirety the major networks are worst in regards to agenda. Fox tends to be more conservative. Read between the lines and arrive at your own conclusions. This directed at banges I. His tunnel vision vision
I know Fox is more conservative than the other networks... Fox is the only conservative network. All the others are Liberal networks. Hey, guess what? I am also a conservative.
Apr 21, 2013 20:12:27 #
You are living in a dream world. If you have all of the answers, how did he afford to go to Harvard?, what were his grades?, what was the subject of his thesis in college?, how did he buy a $3,000.000 house shortly after becoming a community organizer in Chicago? That type of information is readily available on all previous Presidents.
Don't respond if you don't know the answers. You are not qualified,to be in the discussion.
If a background check is to be required to own a firearm, what about a background check and some answers prior to becoming the President of the United States and the leader of the free world?
Don't respond if you don't know the answers. You are not qualified,to be in the discussion.
If a background check is to be required to own a firearm, what about a background check and some answers prior to becoming the President of the United States and the leader of the free world?
Apr 21, 2013 20:58:19 #
donrent wrote:
An Universial Check is already possible - its all on your drivers license...
All the laws needed are already exist - if they're used...
All the laws needed are already exist - if they're used...
Exactly! The laws are on the books. Enforce them!
The problem is that the the laws AREN'T enforced, crimes take place and politicians in office want to get re-elected. They propose these "warm & fuzzy" feel good laws so that come election time, they can claim credit for being "tough on crime", but the new laws aren't enforced any more than the old ones so the problem goes on and on.
Lock these maniacs up or put a needle in their arm so they aren't set free to kill someone else or be housed at taxpayer expense.
Apr 21, 2013 21:27:21 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.