Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What's the difference in these two lens?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Apr 3, 2013 14:36:42   #
wlgoode Loc: Globe, AZ
 
Andy-j wrote:
I spent ages comparing images taken with these 2 and decided the 70-300 was slightly better, also it can be used on FF camera.


If you used it on a DX camera you were using the center "sweet spot" of the lens.

Reply
Apr 3, 2013 17:49:01   #
John Lash
 
Sneidley wrote:
Ok I think I've got it. I like the idea of a slightly heavier lens, and the 15mm I wouldn't cover from 55 to 70 won't bother me. So it's the 70-300 it is.
And $339 shipped doesn't look too bad either.


Be sure you're looking at the right lens. $339 shipped sounds too cheap. I recently bought a used one on ebay for $420.

Reply
Apr 3, 2013 18:00:23   #
John Lash
 
OK, now that I've thought about it. It's probably right for the price. There is a VRI and a VRII.

According to those who should know there is little difference in picture quality between the two. The newer version has a lock button that keeps the lens from unintentionally extending.

Oops, wrong lens. I was thinking of the 18-200.

Reply
 
 
Apr 3, 2013 18:02:16   #
Sneidley Loc: Goodyear, AZ
 
Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G VR AF-S Lens (Factory Refurbished)
Includes Full 1 Year Warranty


starting at
$339.00
Lens Only Value-Packed Kits

Doesn't show up very well, but that is an ad from Cameta

Reply
Apr 3, 2013 18:06:11   #
John Lash
 
Sneidley wrote:
Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G VR AF-S Lens (Factory Refurbished)
Includes Full 1 Year Warranty


starting at
$339.00
Lens Only Value-Packed Kits

Doesn't show up very well, but that is an ad from Cameta


Sorry, you're right. I was thinking of the 18-200 mm.

Reply
Apr 3, 2013 23:27:21   #
mcveed Loc: Kelowna, British Columbia (between trips)
 
craggycrossers wrote:
A little info that might help you unravel the mysteries of Nikon cameras and lenses :-

Nikon Cameras and Nikkor Lenses.
This information is important to understand in terms of future camera/lens planning.
Nikon camera bodies are either termed “Full Frame” (FX) or “APS-C” (DX), the difference being the size of the sensor. Full frame cameras tend to be for professionals or “extreme enthusiasts”.

Current FX cameras include the D4, D3, the D700 and the newly-introduced in 2012 D800 and D600.

Current DX cameras are the D3000 and D5000 series, the D7000, D7100 and the older D80, D90 and the “semi-pro” D200, D300 and D300s.

Nikon lenses are designated either FX or DX.

A DX camera has an APS -C smaller sensor and lenses with a DX in the title were built specifically for this sensor. The DX designated lenses are made smaller and lighter specifically for use on DX bodies in accordance with the reduced needs of the crop sensor. Nikon allows DX lenses to be used on all their FX bodies, but with reduced sensor size results, or else with extreme vignetting.

FX lenses will work on all DX bodies and give the advantage of only needing the centre portion (sweet spot) of the glass in those lenses, typically giving even better net results than they do on FX bodies. FX lenses are also a much better investment as they will not depreciate in value nearly as much as DX lenses, primarily due to the increasing number of users for these lenses. There appears to be an increasing number of DX users moving up to FX bodies. But you can use FX lenses with a DX camera.
All the forum pundits advise that if you are ever thinking of “going FX” then you should buy FX lenses from the start. So as you start buying lenses, give some thought to this !!
Nikon lenses are either "manual focus" (Ai, Ai-S) or "auto-focus" (AF, AF-D, AF-S and AF-S with a G designation, which are the newest).

Unless you are prepared to learn and cope with the (old-fashioned) “manual method” of focussing a lens you should only look for “auto-focus” lenses. Nowadays many older, but high quality manual focus lenses are available, and often are much less expensive, but they are only for use if you don't mind manual focusing... !

Very important !! ....... the most modern auto-focus lenses have their own internal auto-focus motor. Others need to be driven by a motor for that purpose in the camera body. Only lenses with an AF-S designation have their own internal drive motor. Nikon call it "Silent Wave Motor". All the others need to be used on a camera with its own in-camera motor for auto-focus to work. Nikon D3000/D5000 series cameras do NOT have that drive motor and will therefore only autofocus with an AF-S lens. DX Cameras WITH that motor are the D90, D300, D300s, D7000, D7100 and the Full Frame (FX) models the D700, the new D600, the D800 and the pro models the D3, D3x, D4.

Which lenses are good? The term you will see used amongst many enthusiasts for a lens is "glass" – a terrible affectation in my opinion. All Nikon lenses are good, but some are better than others. You usually "get what you pay for". There are also what is known as "fast" lenses. These tend to be either "primes" (single focal length) or zooms (eg 24-70mm/70-200mm) which have a better capability in low light situations. Look for lenses with an aperture of f1.2, f1.4, f1.8, f2, f2.5, f2.8, f4 - and for zooms it should be the same constant large aperture across the whole zoom range. That is NOT to say that lenses with larger aperture range (eg f3.5 - f5.6) are not good. Many will advise "buy the camera body only, then buy the best lens you can afford". Wise advice which can save you a lot of cash in the long run !
A little info that might help you unravel the myst... (show quote)


Good info. One minor technical detail. No nikon lens is designated FX. Lenses which are designated (marked) DX are so marked to warn that they are designed for the smaller sensor of the DX camera. Nikon cameras are designated (marked) DX or FX.

Reply
Apr 3, 2013 23:40:23   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
mcveed wrote:
Good info. One minor technical detail. No nikon lens is designated FX. Lenses which are designated (marked) DX are so marked to warn that they are designed for the smaller sensor of the DX camera. Nikon cameras are designated (marked) DX or FX.


Quite true. Nikon has taken a more direct path by sometimes referring to lenses for FX cameras as "non-DX lenses" (and yes, I can document that)! One would think that camera manufactuters woulf prefer to obfuscate the issue.

Reply
 
 
Apr 6, 2013 19:06:38   #
ballsafire Loc: Lafayette, Louisiana
 
Anytime you mention weight that turns me OFF! I can't stand those (these) big glass lenses when we are beyond this technology already. Let's wake up. Point and Shoot is the way to go, not DSLR.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.