Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Sigma Products Good, Bad ???
Page <prev 2 of 2
Dec 7, 2011 10:43:51   #
Dave T
 
I have another comparison to the '70s. Back then I had a Series 1 Sigma 105/2.5 that was very good. My wife had a Series 1 50-200 zoom that she really liked.

When we got back into photography in the digital era she bought a Sigma 18-125 for her crop sensor Nikon but never got really sharp pictures with it. She traded it for a Nikkor 18-105 and is much happier. I had a Sigma 30/1.4 that seemed fine but I seldom used it so I sold it.

If Sigma still made the Series 1 lenses we might well be customers again.

Dave

Reply
Dec 7, 2011 11:57:24   #
1eyedjack
 
Some Sigmas are better than Tamrons, and some Tamrons are
better than Sigmas. ???? Both are good values for the
zoom range needed, or Macros..

Reply
Dec 7, 2011 12:01:03   #
GWMH Loc: Kisumu, Kenya, East Africa
 
I use a Sigma 18-200 OS on my Nikon, and I really like it...definitely a lot cheaper than the Nikon version of the same! As far as the opposite rotation on the zoom and focus rings, I actually like that better, but that's me...

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2011 12:31:10   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
I tried a couple of Sigmas lenses a long time ago and they were...cra..not very good, to put it kindly.
Now I have two that I love- the unfortunately discontinued 50-150 2.8 (a fantastic portrait lens for DX lenses) and the 10-20.
Have used the 105 macro as well and it's right up there in quality.

Reply
Dec 7, 2011 12:35:36   #
Acountry330 Loc: Dothan,Ala USA
 
I have a150 to 500 mm. And love it. Njice and sharp when I do my part. I shoot a Nicon D-90.

Reply
Dec 7, 2011 12:36:17   #
photogCRD Loc: So Cal
 
I have the Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 lens and I love it. It focuses fast and is super quiet.

Reply
Dec 7, 2011 15:05:27   #
Eugene G Campbell
 
Would you rate the Sigma 150-500mm equalivant or sharper than the Tamron 200-500mm. I've been considering the Sigma for sometime now. Thanks, Gene C.

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2011 15:19:31   #
fotogk Loc: Tuftonboro, NH
 
Eugene G Campbell wrote:
Would you rate the Sigma 150-500mm equalivant or sharper than the Tamron 200-500mm. I've been considering the Sigma for sometime now. Thanks, Gene C.

go to a camera shop shoot both on a number of different subject then check on your monitor and have a could of prints made

Reply
Dec 7, 2011 15:54:00   #
tripsy76 Loc: Northshore, MA
 
I would agree with fotogk. The best way is to shoot. Whenever I invest in a new piece of glass, I'll poor thru every copy in the store until I find one that I'm 100 percent happy with. Sigma's newer lenses have produced some awesome results, and for those with crops, the 30mm prime is said to be one of the best primes to fit. I tried a few, and for photography the lens was awesome. But for video, it had a few issues, so I went with the Canon 28 f1.8 instead ( which is awesome ). I couldn't afford a nice "L" series, or piece of Zeiss glass until I had brought in a few clients but I still had to find a way to get started.
Today, I am madly in love with my 70-20 f2.8. I use it more than my Canon (don't tell!)
Good luck!

Reply
Dec 7, 2011 16:55:49   #
fotogk Loc: Tuftonboro, NH
 
tripsy76 wrote:
I would agree with fotogk. The best way is to shoot. Whenever I invest in a new piece of glass, I'll poor thru every copy in the store until I find one that I'm 100 percent happy with. Sigma's newer lenses have produced some awesome results, and for those with crops, the 30mm prime is said to be one of the best primes to fit. I tried a few, and for photography the lens was awesome. But for video, it had a few issues, so I went with the Canon 28 f1.8 instead ( which is awesome ). I couldn't afford a nice "L" series, or piece of Zeiss glass until I had brought in a few clients but I still had to find a way to get started.
Today, I am madly in love with my 70-20 f2.8. I use it more than my Canon (don't tell!)
Good luck!
I would agree with fotogk. The best way is to shoo... (show quote)
nice 2.8 I am also working on some nicer glass

Reply
Dec 8, 2011 00:48:09   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
I've been using the Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 with image stablization as my walking-around lens most of this year. It went with me this summer on a tour of Italy, Greece, and Istanbul. See images with this post. I took 1000s of pictures with it. I can recommend this lens. I also own the Sigma 150mm f/2.8 Macro lens, one of my best prime lenses. Sigma produces quality lenses at competitive prices. Of course, as a Canon shooter, I lean toward Canon lenses, a product hard to beat.
Pepper wrote:
What kind of reputation does Sigma have when it comes to the brand in general?

Terraced Dwellings, Isle of Capri
Terraced Dwellings, Isle of Capri...

Parthenon, Acropolis, Athens
Parthenon, Acropolis, Athens...

Statue, Ancient Church, Italy
Statue, Ancient Church, Italy...

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.