Boots wrote:
Actually I'm kind of partial to #3 -- it seems to be a much more unusual edifice.
In counterpoint to your presentations of preserved barns, I offer an alternative, dilapidated structure. It appears to be the victim of urban (urban?) sprawl.
Thank you, the #3 is a 200 year old mill and not a barn, very well preserved, Thanks for looking and thanks for showing me the shot of the old structure, very sharp and clear, next year it might be gone,great job!