Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Address to the Pro-gun lobby.
Page <<first <prev 19 of 37 next> last>>
Jan 9, 2013 22:33:51   #
SHUTERED Loc: SO. CAL.
 
I believe that part of the problem is the growing frustration the pro 2nd amendment people have with the anti group is the ignorant, or deliberate misinformation delivered to the public. The "news media", helps to feed this by claiming a look alike carbine or assault weapon is the same as a military issued weapon. Its not! They by federal law haven't been legaly buyable since the 30's when the federal government banned the sale of the old Thomson sub machine gun to the public. There is a big difference between a semi automatic and a weapon that is fully automatic.

Crwiwy wrote:
sarge69 wrote:
What would a sensible debat be?
Sarge69


A debate is a method where two extreme opposing sides have the opportunity to persuade those in the middle to support them.

However, having read too much rant from the pro-gun extremists I can only suggest that they are creating more opponents that supporters. A few Rambo types here have accused me of all sorts of things - which are only in their minds as nowhere in my posts have I judged or suggested changing anything.

Sadly, these people are showing extreme insecurity (you hate us etc.) and juvenility (you don't understand, if you aren't for me then you are against me). Add this to the obvious aggression and quickness to anger and then consider that these people have plenty of lethal weapons and it is no wonder that the 'Liberals' are worried and want more gun laws.

None of the Pro-guns Rambos have given me - and probably no other moderate person - any reasons why I should take them seriously and support their views.
quote=sarge69 What would a sensible debat be? br ... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 9, 2013 22:41:42   #
Photogdog Loc: New Kensington, PA
 
Fkaufman3 wrote:
Say what????


I think what dbur is saying is that when we elect our officials, they take an oath to uphold the Constitution. When they take the oath and don't stick by it year after year, at some point the people are going to say "Enough is enough.".

Keep in mind, when the Constitution was drafted there was quite a bit of discussion concerning which should come first: the right of free speech or the right to keep and bear arms.

Remember, we had just won our freedom from a tyrannical government that banned the ownership of firearms from the colonists in order to keep them in line. The idea was that if ordinary citizens could own guns and the government got out of control, the people could resist.

This is all moot. With the weapons systems that are available to the military today, a hunting rifle might as well be a spitball should the government use the armed forces against a group of fanatics.

Reply
Jan 9, 2013 22:42:27   #
Hal81 Loc: Bucks County, Pa.
 
sarge69 wrote:
hobbycam

Thanks - Now For My Soap-Box Again

Thanks for your well stated posts. But I think, you, as well as I know that it is pushing a cart up a greased hill trying to talk sense into some folks.

I laugh at some statements pertaining to Americans who are drunk, arrogant and wearing hats 'with maple leafs' - Hmmm, I thought that symbol belonged to Canada, and I'm not bashing our northern neighbors with that so don't try to bring that in. Just stating the OP isn't familiar with it so credibility is lost there.

American troubles for the past 10 to 15 years has been in the schools to start with; where children are exposed to the views of the teachers who are mainly extremely liberal and pass on those views to the kids. We DESERVE RESPECT instead of saying WE EARN RESPECT, telling the kids that HAVE THEIR RIGHTS to do just about anything they want rather than RESPECT THE RIGHTS of others. Changing history by tell kids THE WHITE MAN TOOK EVERYTHING from the native Indians in America instead of THE INDIANS GAVE IT UP FOR TRINKETS. It's all about DEMANDING RIGHTS instead of ENJOYING AND RESPECTING RIGHTS. We freaking feed the kids now for Breakfast and Lunch also. Hmmmm, I ate breakfast at home and paid a small fee for lunch in the mid to late 50s. As one poster said about English on airline crews, I remember when that came into being as before that it was mainly French.

When I went to school, I was taught pure and simple that life was going to be hard unless I ( the student ) studied, learned History, Geography, Social Studies, Math, English and a foreign language like French, Spanish or German. Now they just try to communicate in some common language with students from a multitude of different cultures and catering to each of them and nothing is learned. The state of Connecticut once had a referendum on changing the state language to Spanish. Can you imagine ?

I absolutely refuse to press a number to speak English and you'll find that if you don't press 1 for English or 2 for Spanish, the recording reverts to English. This ain't a Spanish language country, you live here, SPEAK ENGLISH. Accommodate another language but don't shove it down my throat.

I just read in the paper that the detainees at Gitmo are getting a 5+ million dollar award because they were subject to torture there. HELLO ? Just imagine if a little water torture revealed intentions of the 9-11 disaster? Would the end justify the means in that situation?

I could go on and on what pisses me off now-a-days but just let me say that we cannot afford to bend to DEMANDS all the time instead of EARN YOUR MONEY and RIGHTS, don't DEMAND them without working for them.

For Christ sake, this country and it's liberal, socialistic path is really pissing me off.

There, I feel better. Let the flaming begin as I make another cup of Dunking Donuts coffee.

Sarge69
B hobbycam /b br br Thanks - Now For My Soap-Bo... (show quote)


Right on sarge.Glad to know we still have some freedom loving people here and not all are willing to give it all up to an out of control goverment that wants to take it all away. The brainless saps on here may some day get what they want then it will be way too late. We will say we told you so but it will be too late to turn things around. We will never give up our guns without a fight. The none gun onwers will then wish they had kept theirs. Let them ramble on in their unknowing ways. But we will keep up the fight. We will even fight to save their rights even though they are too dumb to do it for themselves. Cheers.

Reply
 
 
Jan 10, 2013 11:21:09   #
RobertW Loc: Breezy Point, New York
 
NONE of the killers, whether insane, sane, intelligent or dumb;- would have been able to kill as many innocent people as they did without the assault and rapid-fire weapons they used....No one denies those who choose to have normal weaponry for whatever reason their right to have such weaponry...but I ask once again...Why does anyone need an assault or rapid fire weapon or a clip that can fire 30 times without reload??? Are we expecting an invasion?? How many rounds does it take to shoot a deer or a target??
RobertW

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 11:30:17   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
RobertW wrote:
NONE of the killers, whether insane, sane, intelligent or dumb;- would have been able to kill as many innocent people as they did without the assault and rapid-fire weapons they used....No one denies those who choose to have normal weaponry for whatever reason their right to have such weaponry...but I ask once again...Why does anyone need an assault or rapid fire weapon or a clip that can fire 30 times without reload??? Are we expecting an invasion?? How many rounds does it take to shoot a deer or a target??
RobertW
NONE of the killers, whether insane, sane, intelli... (show quote)


Read up on tyranny and the 2nd amendment.No brainer after that.

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 11:48:48   #
aspliz
 
I have a screenprinting and sign business. I was just lettering the local library with their hours and a no gun decal. As I was applying the lettering, I thought to myself "how dumb is this?". I am a gun owner with my CCW. I would be the last person that would walk in and open fire and the lettering I applied was not going to stop some nut from walking in and firing a weapon. CRIMINALS DON'T CARE AND THE EMOTIONALLY UNSTABLE ARE JUST THAT, UNSTABLE!!!
That kid in CN could just have easily went on the internet, made a few pipe bombs and blown the school sky high.
It's all about common sense. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be any of that anymore.
and the government..... don't even get me started, they can't even balance a checkbook and the rules they make are for us not them.

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 12:22:45   #
singleviking Loc: Lake Sebu Eco Park, Philippines
 
yhtomit wrote:
RobertW wrote:
NONE of the killers, whether insane, sane, intelligent or dumb;- would have been able to kill as many innocent people as they did without the assault and rapid-fire weapons they used....No one denies those who choose to have normal weaponry for whatever reason their right to have such weaponry...but I ask once again...Why does anyone need an assault or rapid fire weapon or a clip that can fire 30 times without reload??? Are we expecting an invasion?? How many rounds does it take to shoot a deer or a target??
RobertW
NONE of the killers, whether insane, sane, intelli... (show quote)


Read up on tyranny and the 2nd amendment.No brainer after that.
quote=RobertW NONE of the killers, whether insane... (show quote)


Tyranny? I can understand sometimes you eat the bear and sometimes the bear eats you, but tyranny in Alaska? Maybe you were planning on shooting Sarah Pallen? Lately the only thing that really needs shooting is the tv set when all that's on are reality TV shows, untalent contests, faith healing religious prognasticators,HSN and FOX or CNN news which I consider to be theater of the obsurd..

Reply
 
 
Jan 10, 2013 12:31:32   #
UXOEOD
 
I am beginning to understand after reading all this extremely well stated opinion from you Gun-phobic liberals. I am considering painting all my guns pink, stenceling them with hearts and cute little bunny rabbits.
Where they currently are labled "MANUAL/SEMI-AUTO" I am going to white out the Semi-Auto and write Manual+ instead. Then they won't be so scary, and you out there who think with your feelings instead of you brains won't have to be so afraid!

Comments?

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 12:33:11   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
Crwiwy wrote:
Any chance of getting back to normality and basic civilness by putting the gun debate to bed?

You claim freedoms in the US - probably more than the UK - yet some are denying others the right of free speech.

In what could have been interesting debates on the pro's and cons of gun control laws you have missed a valuable opportunity to put your views in a sensible way.

Instead, you have dug in to entrenched positions on high ground, banging your soap box, and are shooting at anything that moves - including the moderators.

One of you told me 'If you're not for us then you are against' - which is not an attitude guaranteed to gain support and therefore in your mind puts anyone not 100% in agreement with your views as the enemy.

Others said 'you don't understand' and I fully concur with this statement - however, when civil questions were asked in order to try to understand your view, then they was greeted with unwarranted pages of vitriol, abuse and lots about the First amendment.

Questions trying to understand why an arsenal of heavy firepower is apparently needed were met the same way with just a very few - more reasonable people - giving a bit of explanation about some of the types of guns mentioned.

Nowhere in the debate did I see anything about scrapping the First amendment - nor a suggestion of taking away your rights to own firearms!

The debate even deteriorated into prejudices such as everyone hates us and more specifically 'the Brits hate the Americans' claim, even foreigners trying to tell them what to do - goodness only knows where these ideas came from but there was nothing in the posts to warrant it but you should be able to see why I used the word 'paranoia'.

I am still impartial and would like to understand this issue but I fear that it will not come from yourselves and if the pro-gun people are not prepared to sensibly put their side of the argument - then why should others go to the bother of trying to understand?

Because many people have given up on this subject you will no doubt think you have won the debate however you have simply added to the growing tide of opinion against you.

I don't doubt that normally you are good citizens who have a common enjoyment of photography. Mention guns however and it is a case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde where a totally different personality comes out.

The impression I have been left with is that some of you are acting like the worst characters in the films where you have an arsenal in the basement and whenever possible, load up the pickup and go out to blast anything that dares move. This impression has come from YOUR answers, not from preconceived ideas and I hadn't - until now - taken the films seriously. That is not encouraging and only adds to the arguments
against you.

So in future let us restrict subjects of 'guns' to the photographic type unless you are willing to enter into a sensible debate.
Any chance of getting back to normality and basic ... (show quote)


What you don't seem to understand is that this is a black and white issue. There is no gray area. There can be no compromise. Anti-gunners are idiots with no logic who think that a police force who gets to a location in 15 to 45 minutes is enough to stop a criminal act that happened in less than 5 minutes. Gun owners know better and that's why they own guns.

Either we have the Constitutional right to own and bear ALL types and sizes of guns (fully automatic weapons are already banned anyway) or Liberals will definitely twist the Constitution's meaning and start removing the right to own some types of guns (Step 1), then later boost that leverage into removing the right to own some others (Step 2), then increase that to eliminate semi-auto ammunition clips down to only four or five rounds each and require registration of them (Step 3), then take the right to have more than 25 rounds of ammunition in your possession (Step 4), etc. until they finally take everything except bird caliber pea-shooter shotguns and put ALL the law-abiding American public in eminent danger of criminal and terrorist attack at a level never before seen in history. The 2nd Amendment is then completely gone but it was taken bite by bite instead of all at once. That's how Liberals work their rights attacks.

There is a female Congressman from New Hampshire who has the brass balls to present a law for consideration that would ban Conservatives from settling in her state (based on previous voting history apparently) and allow the state to expel Conservatives because they suppress the progress that the government could achieve if Conservatives weren't present. What the hell? Is that Democracy? Is that compromise? Is that Constitutional? Is that even patriotic or American? How big of a step would it be for her to then present and get a law passed by her all-Liberal state government to expel all gun owners from her state and confiscate ALL their possessions by government eminent domain? Does anybody see that as no longer being a Democracy?

We gun owners must fight to keep everything intact as it is today or this Socialist complete de-arming of our citizenry will be the result. If those in the middle don't believe that, so be it. It's fact. If those in the middle can see through the media wool thrown over their eyes and join us, then good for them.

Liberals know that the owners of 300 million guns in the U.S. would stand up in defiance against an all-out cancellation of the 2nd Amendment but they are sleepy and don't notice when a right is being chipped away a little at a time. The NRA and other staunch 2nd Amendment supporters know in advance what Liberals are up to and MUST stand firm against it starting or we end up as a bunch of sitting ducks waiting to be picked off by criminals just like you are.

As is repeated over and over but people like you don't grasp - if the government take guns, any or all, away from the law-abiding citizenry, law-abiding innocents are then at the mercy of law-breaking criminals who still have abundant illegal weaponry to use for criminal purposes.

If carrying a handgun legally makes me feel more powerful and more resistant to criminal activity, that's the point. I have a wife and two year old toddler and whenever we leave this house near dark, I always carry concealed. Depending on where we're going I carry concealed in the daytime too. When held at gun point during a robbery by a sociopathic PCP drug user who may just shoot us all after the robbery so we can't identify him, I desperately need something equally as lethal as his illegal gun to save my family. That is not a stick, band director's whistle, or pepper spray. If two or three invaders use an axe on my front door and comes in with shotguns or large caliber revolvers, I want the power to stop the intrusion.

If you have a wife and children, and truly love them more than yourself or a fairy tale pacifist ideology - like a husband and father should, you prepare to protect them from potential death or severe physical impairment with lethal power just like I do.

No government has the right to only allow me to use a single shot 28" barrel bird-caliber shotgun that has to be reloaded after each shot when there are 3 or 4 attackers confronting me - but that's what they want to achieve - either in one fell swoop which the public would not allow - or piece by piece which much of the public wouldn't notice.

It's clear with terms you use, such as gun owners being Rambo, that you are a pacifist Liberal, so quit hiding behind a "supposedly" undecided position. I do not change personality over guns but I have the right to become angered by those who would confiscate my guns and allow my family to be killed because I have no way of protecting us.

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 12:37:17   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
singleviking wrote:
yhtomit wrote:
RobertW wrote:
NONE of the killers, whether insane, sane, intelligent or dumb;- would have been able to kill as many innocent people as they did without the assault and rapid-fire weapons they used....No one denies those who choose to have normal weaponry for whatever reason their right to have such weaponry...but I ask once again...Why does anyone need an assault or rapid fire weapon or a clip that can fire 30 times without reload??? Are we expecting an invasion?? How many rounds does it take to shoot a deer or a target??
RobertW
NONE of the killers, whether insane, sane, intelli... (show quote)


Read up on tyranny and the 2nd amendment.No brainer after that.
quote=RobertW NONE of the killers, whether insane... (show quote)


Tyranny? I can understand sometimes you eat the bear and sometimes the bear eats you, but tyranny in Alaska? Maybe you were planning on shooting Sarah Pallen? Lately the only thing that really needs shooting is the tv set when all that's on are reality TV shows, untalent contests, faith healing religious prognasticators,HSN and FOX or CNN news which I consider to be theater of the obsurd..
quote=yhtomit quote=RobertW NONE of the killers,... (show quote)


We are taxed for being born now=tyranny,care to discuss that?
No bears where I'm located.
No it is wrong to suggest people should shoot Sarah Palin.
I have already killed my television.

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 12:40:29   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
singleviking wrote:
yhtomit wrote:
RobertW wrote:
NONE of the killers, whether insane, sane, intelligent or dumb;- would have been able to kill as many innocent people as they did without the assault and rapid-fire weapons they used....No one denies those who choose to have normal weaponry for whatever reason their right to have such weaponry...but I ask once again...Why does anyone need an assault or rapid fire weapon or a clip that can fire 30 times without reload??? Are we expecting an invasion?? How many rounds does it take to shoot a deer or a target??
RobertW
NONE of the killers, whether insane, sane, intelli... (show quote)


Read up on tyranny and the 2nd amendment.No brainer after that.
quote=RobertW NONE of the killers, whether insane... (show quote)


Tyranny? I can understand sometimes you eat the bear and sometimes the bear eats you, but tyranny in Alaska? Maybe you were planning on shooting Sarah Pallen? Lately the only thing that really needs shooting is the tv set when all that's on are reality TV shows, untalent contests, faith healing religious prognasticators,HSN and FOX or CNN news which I consider to be theater of the obsurd..
quote=yhtomit quote=RobertW NONE of the killers,... (show quote)


I forgot, which TV news do you frequent or believe?

Reply
 
 
Jan 10, 2013 12:42:28   #
singleviking Loc: Lake Sebu Eco Park, Philippines
 
UXOEOD wrote:
I am beginning to understand after reading all this extremely well stated opinion from you Gun-phobic liberals. I am considering painting all my guns pink, stenceling them with hearts and cute little bunny rabbits.
Where they currently are labled "MANUAL/SEMI-AUTO" I am going to white out the Semi-Auto and write Manual+ instead. Then they won't be so scary, and you out there who think with your feelings instead of you brains won't have to be so afraid!

Comments?


Well you'll sure fit in the social circles in PORTLANDIA anyway. And you'd look great with your guns in PINK and those hearts & bunnies all over them on the cover of GUNS & AMMO. Might set a new trend in camaflage. I'm still expectantly waiting for the explanation of what you're so affraid of other than your freinds and neighbors when they see you in that getup.

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 12:51:56   #
UXOEOD
 
singleviking wrote:
UXOEOD wrote:
I am beginning to understand after reading all this extremely well stated opinion from you Gun-phobic liberals. I am considering painting all my guns pink, stenceling them with hearts and cute little bunny rabbits.
Where they currently are labled "MANUAL/SEMI-AUTO" I am going to white out the Semi-Auto and write Manual+ instead. Then they won't be so scary, and you out there who think with your feelings instead of you brains won't have to be so afraid!

Comments?


Well you'll sure fit in the social circles in PORTLANDIA anyway. And you'd look great with your guns in PINK and those hearts & bunnies all over them on the cover of GUNS & AMMO. Might set a new trend in camaflage. I'm still expectantly waiting for the explanation of what you're so affraid of other than your freinds and neighbors when they see you in that getup.
quote=UXOEOD I am beginning to understand after r... (show quote)


Better a pink gun than no gun!

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 12:52:49   #
singleviking Loc: Lake Sebu Eco Park, Philippines
 
yhtomit wrote:
singleviking wrote:
yhtomit wrote:
RobertW wrote:
NONE of the killers, whether insane, sane, intelligent or dumb;- would have been able to kill as many innocent people as they did without the assault and rapid-fire weapons they used....No one denies those who choose to have normal weaponry for whatever reason their right to have such weaponry...but I ask once again...Why does anyone need an assault or rapid fire weapon or a clip that can fire 30 times without reload??? Are we expecting an invasion?? How many rounds does it take to shoot a deer or a target??
RobertW
NONE of the killers, whether insane, sane, intelli... (show quote)


Read up on tyranny and the 2nd amendment.No brainer after that.
quote=RobertW NONE of the killers, whether insane... (show quote)


Tyranny? I can understand sometimes you eat the bear and sometimes the bear eats you, but tyranny in Alaska? Maybe you were planning on shooting Sarah Pallen? Lately the only thing that really needs shooting is the tv set when all that's on are reality TV shows, untalent contests, faith healing religious prognasticators,HSN and FOX or CNN news which I consider to be theater of the obsurd..
quote=yhtomit quote=RobertW NONE of the killers,... (show quote)


We are taxed for being born now=tyranny,care to discuss that?
No bears where I'm located.
No it is wrong to suggest people should shoot Sarah Palin.
I have already killed my television.
quote=singleviking quote=yhtomit quote=RobertW ... (show quote)


And how about the annual stippend you receive for being a resident of Alaska from the Federal Government? That should easily cover your so called "birth tax", and what the hell is that anyway?

Reply
Jan 10, 2013 13:10:04   #
hobbycam Loc: Now in "Hollister, Ca."
 
marcomarks wrote:
Crwiwy wrote:
Any chance of getting back to normality and basic civilness by putting the gun debate to bed?

You claim freedoms in the US - probably more than the UK - yet some are denying others the right of free speech.

In what could have been interesting debates on the pro's and cons of gun control laws you have missed a valuable opportunity to put your views in a sensible way.

Instead, you have dug in to entrenched positions on high ground, banging your soap box, and are shooting at anything that moves - including the moderators.

One of you told me 'If you're not for us then you are against' - which is not an attitude guaranteed to gain support and therefore in your mind puts anyone not 100% in agreement with your views as the enemy.

Others said 'you don't understand' and I fully concur with this statement - however, when civil questions were asked in order to try to understand your view, then they was greeted with unwarranted pages of vitriol, abuse and lots about the First amendment.

Questions trying to understand why an arsenal of heavy firepower is apparently needed were met the same way with just a very few - more reasonable people - giving a bit of explanation about some of the types of guns mentioned.

Nowhere in the debate did I see anything about scrapping the First amendment - nor a suggestion of taking away your rights to own firearms!

The debate even deteriorated into prejudices such as everyone hates us and more specifically 'the Brits hate the Americans' claim, even foreigners trying to tell them what to do - goodness only knows where these ideas came from but there was nothing in the posts to warrant it but you should be able to see why I used the word 'paranoia'.

I am still impartial and would like to understand this issue but I fear that it will not come from yourselves and if the pro-gun people are not prepared to sensibly put their side of the argument - then why should others go to the bother of trying to understand?

Because many people have given up on this subject you will no doubt think you have won the debate however you have simply added to the growing tide of opinion against you.

I don't doubt that normally you are good citizens who have a common enjoyment of photography. Mention guns however and it is a case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde where a totally different personality comes out.

The impression I have been left with is that some of you are acting like the worst characters in the films where you have an arsenal in the basement and whenever possible, load up the pickup and go out to blast anything that dares move. This impression has come from YOUR answers, not from preconceived ideas and I hadn't - until now - taken the films seriously. That is not encouraging and only adds to the arguments
against you.

So in future let us restrict subjects of 'guns' to the photographic type unless you are willing to enter into a sensible debate.
Any chance of getting back to normality and basic ... (show quote)


What you don't seem to understand is that this is a black and white issue. There is no gray area. There can be no compromise. Anti-gunners are idiots with no logic who think that a police force who gets to a location in 15 to 45 minutes is enough to stop a criminal act that happened in less than 5 minutes. Gun owners know better and that's why they own guns.

Either we have the Constitutional right to own and bear ALL types and sizes of guns (fully automatic weapons are already banned anyway) or Liberals will definitely twist the Constitution's meaning and start removing the right to own some types of guns (Step 1), then later boost that leverage into removing the right to own some others (Step 2), then increase that to eliminate semi-auto ammunition clips down to only four or five rounds each and require registration of them (Step 3), then take the right to have more than 25 rounds of ammunition in your possession (Step 4), etc. until they finally take everything except bird caliber pea-shooter shotguns and put ALL the law-abiding American public in eminent danger of criminal and terrorist attack at a level never before seen in history. The 2nd Amendment is then completely gone but it was taken bite by bite instead of all at once. That's how Liberals work their rights attacks.

There is a female Congressman from New Hampshire who has the brass balls to present a law for consideration that would ban Conservatives from settling in her state (based on previous voting history apparently) and allow the state to expel Conservatives because they suppress the progress that the government could achieve if Conservatives weren't present. What the hell? Is that Democracy? Is that compromise? Is that Constitutional? Is that even patriotic or American? How big of a step would it be for her to then present and get a law passed by her all-Liberal state government to expel all gun owners from her state and confiscate ALL their possessions by government eminent domain? Does anybody see that as no longer being a Democracy?

We gun owners must fight to keep everything intact as it is today or this Socialist complete de-arming of our citizenry will be the result. If those in the middle don't believe that, so be it. It's fact. If those in the middle can see through the media wool thrown over their eyes and join us, then good for them.

Liberals know that the owners of 300 million guns in the U.S. would stand up in defiance against an all-out cancellation of the 2nd Amendment but they are sleepy and don't notice when a right is being chipped away a little at a time. The NRA and other staunch 2nd Amendment supporters know in advance what Liberals are up to and MUST stand firm against it starting or we end up as a bunch of sitting ducks waiting to be picked off by criminals just like you are.

As is repeated over and over but people like you don't grasp - if the government take guns, any or all, away from the law-abiding citizenry, law-abiding innocents are then at the mercy of law-breaking criminals who still have abundant illegal weaponry to use for criminal purposes.

If carrying a handgun legally makes me feel more powerful and more resistant to criminal activity, that's the point. I have a wife and two year old toddler and whenever we leave this house near dark, I always carry concealed. Depending on where we're going I carry concealed in the daytime too. When held at gun point during a robbery by a sociopathic PCP drug user who may just shoot us all after the robbery so we can't identify him, I desperately need something equally as lethal as his illegal gun to save my family. That is not a stick, band director's whistle, or pepper spray. If two or three invaders use an axe on my front door and comes in with shotguns or large caliber revolvers, I want the power to stop the intrusion.

If you have a wife and children, and truly love them more than yourself or a fairy tale pacifist ideology - like a husband and father should, you prepare to protect them from potential death or severe physical impairment with lethal power just like I do.

No government has the right to only allow me to use a single shot 28" barrel bird-caliber shotgun that has to be reloaded after each shot when there are 3 or 4 attackers confronting me - but that's what they want to achieve - either in one fell swoop which the public would not allow - or piece by piece which much of the public wouldn't notice.

It's clear with terms you use, such as gun owners being Rambo, that you are a pacifist Liberal, so quit hiding behind a "supposedly" undecided position. I do not change personality over guns but I have the right to become angered by those who would confiscate my guns and allow my family to be killed because I have no way of protecting us.
quote=Crwiwy Any chance of getting back to normal... (show quote)


Good post :-)
I for one do not believe that the police can protect us and family.
But they are very good statistic takers.
Wont do me or my family any good as a statistic.

I am an American citizen, Gun owner, Nra Member and a Navy vet (Seal retired )
May God Bless :-)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 19 of 37 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.