Please give me a feedback.
Apr 28, 2024 11:44:13 #
Apr 28, 2024 12:12:09 #
Wingpilot wrote:
Number 3 is interesting but I prefer #2. And yes, leave the grass in. It adds an item of interest, making it a unique image.
Apr 28, 2024 12:32:45 #
Rongnongno wrote:
This is the stray grass strands I'm asking about...
I'd leave it in.
Apr 28, 2024 14:02:08 #
Apr 28, 2024 14:03:06 #
tcthome
Loc: NJ
Rongnongno wrote:
That one was for fun. As to overcooked... Certainly is and meant to be.
Apr 28, 2024 15:24:03 #
rbtree
Loc: Shoreline, WA, United States
Rascal gene wrote:
Bottom photo with sky cropped out!
Done... I think I like the original better
Edit. What am I doing wrong? The image isn't being embedded. I haven't been here in a while, but never had that problem before
Apr 28, 2024 15:44:22 #
rbtree wrote:
Done... I think I like the original better
Edit. What am I doing wrong? The image isn't being embedded. I haven't been here in a while, but never had that problem before
Edit. What am I doing wrong? The image isn't being embedded. I haven't been here in a while, but never had that problem before
It is a WEBP.
As to crop it? Absolutely not. Your edit kills the image.
Apr 28, 2024 15:46:16 #
rbtree wrote:
Done... I think I like the original better
Edit. What am I doing wrong? The image isn't being embedded. I haven't been here in a while, but never had that problem before
Edit. What am I doing wrong? The image isn't being embedded. I haven't been here in a while, but never had that problem before
The file you sent was a ".webp". It's there, clicking on it displays the image in the browser, but the UHH code is not set up to handle .webp files. Better to send JPEGs for embedding.
Apr 28, 2024 15:48:49 #
Longshadow wrote:
The file you sent was a ".webp". It's there, clicking on it displays the image in the browser, but the UHH code is not set up to handle .webp files. Better to send JPEGs for embedding.
Actually, you just need to adapt. I post most of my images in the WEBP format...
How? Tags are [ img ] file location [ / IMG ]
Apr 28, 2024 15:57:27 #
Rongnongno wrote:
Actually, you just need to adapt. I post most of my images in the WEBP format...
How? Tags are [ img ] file location [ / IMG ]
How? Tags are [ img ] file location [ / IMG ]
Adapt???
How does one adapt to the UHH code not supporting embedding HEIC or WEBP files?????
I simply click download and walla, there's the photo.....
It's just not embedded in the thread page for viewing without downloading.
Apr 28, 2024 16:15:26 #
Longshadow wrote:
Adapt???
How does one adapt to the UHH code not supporting embedding HEIC or WEBP files?????
I simply click download and walla, voila there's the photo.....
It's just not embedded in the thread page for viewing without downloading.
How does one adapt to the UHH code not supporting embedding HEIC or WEBP files?????
I simply click download and walla, voila there's the photo.....
It's just not embedded in the thread page for viewing without downloading.
Well, if you want folks to see it, it is the only solution as for one, I do not bother to click on a simple Download most of the time.
Not using the IMG tag is the sole responsibility of the poster. This method also by-passes the sRGB limitation.
Apr 28, 2024 16:17:44 #
Rongnongno wrote:
Well, if you want folks to see it, it is the only solution as for one, I do not bother to click on a simple Download most of the time.
Not using the IMG tag is the sole responsibility of the poster. This method also by-passes the sRGB limitation.
Not using the IMG tag is the sole responsibility of the poster. This method also by-passes the sRGB limitation.
The majority will simply "upload" an image...
They don't want to be bothered with using tags.
And you know some will say "What's a tag?".
And that is your choice.
I rarely click on download after viewing the image in-line.
Sometimes I do.
But if it's a WEBP or HEIC and I want to see the image,
I click on download.
Apr 28, 2024 16:50:13 #
Longshadow wrote:
The majority will simply "upload" an image...
They don't want to be bothered with using tags.
And you know some will say "What's a tag?".
And that is your choice.
I rarely click on download after viewing the image in-line.
Sometimes I do.
But if it's a WEBP or HEIC and I want to see the image,
I click on download.
They don't want to be bothered with using tags.
And you know some will say "What's a tag?".
And that is your choice.
I rarely click on download after viewing the image in-line.
Sometimes I do.
But if it's a WEBP or HEIC and I want to see the image,
I click on download.
I click on download only if I see an interest to give feedback. If just a download? Why waste my time?
Many times these downloads are not worth it, so I pass.
Apr 28, 2024 17:08:18 #
Rongnongno wrote:
I click on download only if I see an interest to give feedback. If just a download? Why waste my time?
Many times these downloads are not worth it, so I pass.
Many times these downloads are not worth it, so I pass.
Like I said, your prerogative.....
So if it's an HEIC or WEBP you don't even bother?
Apr 28, 2024 18:15:34 #
Longshadow wrote:
Like I said, your prerogative.....
So if it's an HEIC or WEBP you don't even bother?
So if it's an HEIC or WEBP you don't even bother?
Correct, if something is presented as a link and the op does not care enough to make a minimal effort to make it visible, why should I?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.