Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
How Many Will Vote for Trump a 3rd Time?
Page <<first <prev 6 of 16 next> last>>
Mar 1, 2024 11:09:59   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
DaveO wrote:
How do you defame a scum-bag and traitor?


You have already convicted Trump before any trial just as the far left has asked you.

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 11:15:25   #
Triple G
 
letmedance wrote:
You have already convicted Trump before any trial just as the far left has asked you.


He's been convicted. End of that argument.

He is charged with cheating again....who would have guessed? Believe who people are by how they portray themselves.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/architect-trumps-social-media-deal-sues-block-transaction-2024-02-29/

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 11:17:39   #
Triple G
 
letmedance wrote:
Did anyone ever consider that Carroll actually defamed Trump with her bogus claims?


He counterfiled with that claim and it was determined to not have merit. Look it up.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-dismisses-donald-trumps-defamation-claim-against-e-jean-carroll-2023-08-07/

Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2024 11:38:10   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
letmedance wrote:
You have already convicted Trump before any trial just as the far left has asked you.


My, how clever. The far right must have influenced your reply.

Supporting a traitor is hard work...

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 11:41:31   #
Effate Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.
 
Triple G wrote:
What will all the court records show that includes the judges' comments?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/01/29/donald-trump-rape-e-jean-carroll/72295009007/

Whether he used finger or penis to penetrate her determined whether jury could answer yes to that question. Do you consider one non-consensual penetration as rape and the other as not?

"By responding "no" to the question of whether Carroll proved Trump raped her, the jurors indicated they weren't convinced Trump penetrated Carroll with his penis, according to Kaplan, who first wrote about the issue in July when he denied Trump a new trial in the sexual abuse case.

But the jurors' conclusion that Trump sexually abused Carroll "necessarily implies" that they did, in fact, believe he penetrated her with his fingers, Kaplan said.

Here was his reasoning:

Kaplan noted his instruction to the jury that, for Trump to have sexually abused Carroll, Trump needed to have touched her sexual or intimate parts. The only allegations from Carroll that could possibly fit that bill were forcible kissing, pulling down her tights, and vaginal penetration, he said."
What will all the court records show that includes... (show quote)


I am in no way defending Trump as I could care less about this case but reading the jury instruction you provided states that only touching is required for sexual abuse (penetration of any kind not required). Then he goes on to instruct (I assume based on Carroll’s testimony) that the only “allegations” that she made that would fall under the statute were forcible kissing, pulling down her tights and vaginal penetration. He is merely telling the jury that of what she testified this is the conduct that would fall within the statute. But the judge, if I can assume he said what you reported seemingly made a fallacious assumption as by his own instruction only touching sexual or intimate parts is necessary for a finding of sexual abuse so the jury could have found that merely touching was enough for their finding yet the judge stated that their finding “necessarily implies” penetration.

From your post: “ Kaplan noted his instruction to the jury that, for Trump to have sexually abused Carroll, Trump needed to have touched her sexual or intimate parts. The only allegations from Carroll that could possibly fit that bill were forcible kissing, pulling down her tights, and vaginal penetration, he said."

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 11:43:28   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Aren't guessing games fun!

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 11:46:59   #
SteveS Loc: The US is my home.
 
Triple G wrote:
No criminal record because it was not a criminal case.

There is a civil case record of all the claims including trumps' countersuit which was denied. Those records show liable for sexual assault with judges' and legal analysts that sexual assault included rape - just not determined if it was with trump's penis. The only way that changes is if an appeal overturns the verdict.

You may not believe that non-consensual vaginal penetration of any kind is rape, but that's on you. The civil record (all pertinent pages of testimony, etc.) says it is.
No criminal record because it was not a criminal c... (show quote)


Either you failed reading comprehension or just can't read. This all started about if Trump was convicted of rape, the answer to that is "NO". I will provide the court document one more time, please have someone read it to you.



Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2024 11:54:35   #
Effate Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.
 
SteveS wrote:
Either you failed reading comprehension or just can't read. This all started about if Trump was convicted of rape, the answer to that is "NO". I will provide the court document one more time, please have someone read it to you.


Maybe this will help with the distinction:

Aggravated Sexual Abuse vs Rape
As a digital penetration attorney in New York will explain, under the New York Penal Code, while aggravated sexual abuse and rape area both felony sex crimes that involve penetration, the two crimes have notable differences. Each of the 4 rape crimes requires sexual intercourse. The New York Penal Code gives “sexual intercourse” its “ordinary meaning” which is penetration, however slight, of a vagina by a penis. Digital penetration and penetration by an object are not included in the definition. Thus, where penetration is digital, the charge would not be rape, but aggravated sexual abuse.

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 12:06:01   #
SteveS Loc: The US is my home.
 
Effate wrote:
Maybe this will help with the distinction:

Aggravated Sexual Abuse vs Rape
As a digital penetration attorney in New York will explain, under the New York Penal Code, while aggravated sexual abuse and rape area both felony sex crimes that involve penetration, the two crimes have notable differences. Each of the 4 rape crimes requires sexual intercourse. The New York Penal Code gives “sexual intercourse” its “ordinary meaning” which is penetration, however slight, of a vagina by a penis. Digital penetration and penetration by an object are not included in the definition. Thus, where penetration is digital, the charge would not be rape, but aggravated sexual abuse.
Maybe this will help with the distinction: br br ... (show quote)


I totally understand. But there seems to be others that continue to push the narrative that Trump was convicted of rape, to which the answer is still NO.

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 12:10:57   #
Triple G
 
Effate wrote:
Maybe this will help with the distinction:

Aggravated Sexual Abuse vs Rape
As a digital penetration attorney in New York will explain, under the New York Penal Code, while aggravated sexual abuse and rape area both felony sex crimes that involve penetration, the two crimes have notable differences. Each of the 4 rape crimes requires sexual intercourse. The New York Penal Code gives “sexual intercourse” its “ordinary meaning” which is penetration, however slight, of a vagina by a penis. Digital penetration and penetration by an object are not included in the definition. Thus, where penetration is digital, the charge would not be rape, but aggravated sexual abuse.
Maybe this will help with the distinction: br br ... (show quote)


Everyone has an opinion, but the search of any legal questions of criminal rape will come up as negative, but will have inquiring minds continuing the search on the civil side will find "liable for sexual assault (adj. to aggravated assault) . All notes and primary source research will include the "rape" terminology. If it feels better to you to vote for an aggravated sexual assaulter vs a rapist, that's up to your conscience.

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 12:13:21   #
Triple G
 
SteveS wrote:
I totally understand. But there seems to be others that continue to push the narrative that Trump was convicted of rape, to which the answer is still NO.


Words matter, I agree.
What is the ranking of desirability of a presidential candidate?

Guilty of rape
Liable for aggravated sexual assault

Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2024 12:26:15   #
Effate Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.
 
Triple G wrote:
Everyone has an opinion, but the search of any legal questions of criminal rape will come up as negative, but will have inquiring minds continuing the search on the civil side will find "liable for sexual assault (adj. to aggravated assault) . All notes and primary source research will include the "rape" terminology. If it feels better to you to vote for an aggravated sexual assaulter vs a rapist, that's up to your conscience.


Not an opinion just the actual codified legal distinction. Words do matter and to assume that because I looked at the words that you posted and read “what they actually said” you know how I would vote is another assumption on your part.

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 12:52:32   #
jcboy3
 
hondo812 wrote:
The real question is, who do you have that is better? It is NOT Joe Biden. That man has been nothing short of a disaster.

Kamala? Hahahahahaaahahghgahahahahahahaha!

Is there a different Democrat anywhere? Biden/Harris had their 4 years in the sun and they are well on their way to bankrupting the country.

Then you have Nikki Haley and she just seems like another conniving asshole to me. You could call her a liberal tomorrow and I'd believe you.

There's RFK Jr. I like some of the things he has to say and he probably wouldn't have the slow ramp up that candidates outside of politics have.

Gabbard? Smart but a bit too new.

Vivek? Also smart but brand spanking new.

I think this election is going to be less about Joe and Donald and a lot more about the farm team they develop in the next 4 years.

The good news for Republicans is that they're already on the ground doing it and Senile Joe is the face of the Democrat party.
The real question is, who do you have that is bett... (show quote)


An old smelly sneaker would be better than Trump.

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 12:55:47   #
Triple G
 
Effate wrote:
Not an opinion just the actual codified legal distinction. Words do matter and to assume that because I looked at the words that you posted and read “what they actually said” you know how I would vote is another assumption on your part.


Yup. I'm pretty sure you've made yourself clear.

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 14:48:58   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
DaveO wrote:
My, how clever. The far right must have influenced your reply.

Supporting a traitor is hard work...


When was he convicted of being a Traitor, a bigger traitor is the 0ne that opened our most secure border in 45 years and then invited the world to cross it. This country is headed in the direction of Korea, the only difference being that we don't kill our opponents we just use the Justice Department to politically and judicially kill their candidacy.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 16 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.