Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Where were the good guys with guns?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Feb 16, 2024 21:42:20   #
Effate Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.
 
mikee wrote:
We are paying $80 billion per year on prisons now. Eliminate guns and we'd all be safer, with fewer incarcerated (one of the few things we're #1 at as a nation is highest numbers in prisons). Program would pay for itself in less than 10 years. It's called planning ahead, not next plan.


It’s a ridiculous notion as guns will not be eliminated and eliminating guns is not going to eliminate psychopaths. We will always have a need to separate serious offenders in our society that is governed by those who can’t see many of the genuine causes and perpetrators of serious crime. “It’s the gun’s fault!”

Reply
Feb 16, 2024 21:44:24   #
Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay
 
Merlin1300 wrote:
Yes KrakHead is your typical left-wing atheist who never answers the question but descends into the dungeon of diversion. Do you expect a reason?? The dungeon is no place for that.


Why would I EVER expect reason?

Reply
Feb 16, 2024 21:45:25   #
papakatz45 Loc: South Florida-West Palm Beach
 
mikee wrote:
We are paying $80 billion per year on prisons now. Eliminate guns and we'd all be safer, with fewer incarcerated (one of the few things we're #1 at as a nation is highest numbers in prisons). Program would pay for itself in less than 10 years. It's called planning ahead, not next plan.


Over 10,000 people are killed by drunk drivers each year. Eliminate alcoholic beverages or automobiles and we'd all be safer with fewer incarcerated. The program would save 10,000 lives a year. It's called planning ahead, not next plan.

Reply
 
 
Feb 16, 2024 21:52:50   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
mikee wrote:
We are paying $80 billion per year on prisons now. Eliminate guns and we'd all be safer, with fewer incarcerated (one of the few things we're #1 at as a nation is highest numbers in prisons). Program would pay for itself in less than 10 years. It's called planning ahead, not next plan.


As long as the second amendment exists that will not happen. The answer lies in spending another 80 billion into the prison pot and enforce gun crimes properly and send the shooters to jail or to their maker.

Reply
Feb 16, 2024 23:43:27   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
Frank T wrote:
The cops were there. There were 800 of them, yet these psychopaths managed to shoot 15 people.
Considering how easy it is to get, possess, and conceal a gun in Missouri, one might ask another question.
Why can anyone, possess and conceal a firearm with no permit?
The real question is: With more than 18,000 firearm deaths in this country last year, what is it going to take to pass some responsible gun laws?
The answer is: As long as the NRA keeps buying politicians it won't happen. It didn't even happen when Scalise got shot at a ball game, so what makes anyone think they give a shit about us.
The cops were there. There were 800 of them, yet ... (show quote)



If people will bother to look at the video footage, they may clearly observe some “Good Guys” WITHOUT guns tackling one of the perps. And a woman sequestering the gun the perp had been carrying.

The REASON the perps were not stopped by the hypothetical Good Guy(s) With Gun(s), is pretty damn obvious:
The Good Guys were obeying the law(s)! NOT carrying in a public location. NOT breaking the law!
The “Good Guys” were aware that even carrying a gun in such a crowd (let alone USING IT) could endanger more than possibly protect.

It was Criminals who broke laws, not responsible gun owners.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In regards the assertion ever more gun-control laws are required:
It is a fact there are ALREADY “responsible gun laws” in force. From background checks to waiting periods, Licenses to location-bans, Concealed carry versus Open carry restrictions, Extreme Risk Protection Orders and more.

The biggest problem is A LACK OF ENFORCEMENT of those laws.
As well as a LACK OF PROSECUTION of gun-law breakers.

~~~~~~~~~~~

As to ”Why can anyone, possess and conceal a firearm with no permit?”
The answer is very simple: The Second Amendment !

The First amendment reaffirms your/everyone’s inalienable right to piss, moan, bitch or (now) post in internet forums.

The Second amendment reaffirms the inalienable right to prevent the government(s) from disrupting the First and other amendments.

~~~~~~~~~~~

As written in the Declaration of Independence:
”We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

— That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

— That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

(Emphasis added)

The underlying power to do so is codified by the Second Amendment.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The fanciful allegation that the National Rifle Association (NRA) is somehow responsible for promoting CRIMINAL activity is a disgraceful lie. As is the calumny the NRA somehow “buys” Representatives and/or Senators.

The collective members of the NRA are known (by Government data) to be among the most law-abiding citizens in the nation.

NRA members are in favor of, and promote, constitutional rights and freedoms and disagree strongly (and non-violently) to those (Democrats, Liberals, Socialists, Communists) who would restrict or deny Constitutional declarations: the Law of the Land.

Reply
Feb 17, 2024 12:52:40   #
Watash
 
SteveR wrote:
The problem is that more and more people don't care about right or wrong or the sanctity of life. So, more people are being killed. More people commit crime without compunction. It wasn't that way when I was young. People believed in right and wrong.


Anti-gun people will rage about people with guns killing people but never say a word about banning the tools and
equipment to kill thousands upon thousands of babies.

Reply
Feb 17, 2024 13:05:21   #
DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
Stop and frisk seemed to save a lot of lives in NYC even though the liberals hated it, statically we know who is killing who, it may not be the prettiest solution but mothers should not be losing their babies either.

Heavier police and undercover officers in high crime areas and for God's sake stop importing criminal gangs over our southern border.



Just what we need a police state that violates a persons liberty and constitutional rights.
Importing ? Do you know where MS13 originated?

Reply
 
 
Feb 17, 2024 13:08:31   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
Watosh wrote:
Anti-gun people will rage about people with guns killing people but never say a word about banning the tools and
equipment to kill thousands upon thousands of babies.


If people really wanted to address the issue they would study the demographics of murder but that is an issue that our liberal friends do not want to address.

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6.xls

Reply
Feb 17, 2024 13:13:51   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
DennyT wrote:
Just what we need a police state that violates a persons liberty and constitutional rights.
Importing ? Do you know where MS13 originated?


Yeah right, I would have no problem being frisked especially if I know that such actions by the police are taking guns and gang bangers off of the streets and making communities safer while saving lives. It is not that huge of an infringement on my rights, possibly not really an infringement at all as that would be for the courts to decide and it would also be highly dependent on how the policies outlining such a program were developed.

Reply
Feb 17, 2024 13:21:12   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
DennyT wrote:
Just what we need a police state that violates a persons liberty and constitutional rights.
Importing ? Do you know where MS13 originated?


It may have started in LA but it did not stay there as it is throughout Mexico and Central America now, NYC, Chicago, and other cities are having problems caused by criminal gangs recently immigrated from Venezuela as well.

Reply
Feb 17, 2024 14:13:04   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
DennyT wrote:
Just what we need a police state that violates a persons liberty and constitutional rights.
Importing ? Do you know where MS13 originated?


Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A.

[i]”MS-13, also known as Mara Salvatrucha, is a transnational criminal gang that originated in Los Angeles, California, in the 1980s. The majority of its members are Central Americans, mainly Salvadorans.Jul 12, 2023
https://greydynamics.com › mara-salvatrucha.
Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13): From El Salvador to Los Angeles - Grey Dynamics

Reply
 
 
Feb 17, 2024 14:48:44   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
mikee wrote:
We've all heard it...the NRA rhetoric. It takes a good guy with a gun to stop a bad guy with a gun. Well, what happened in KC yesterday then? There were 800 good guys (police; highly trained, all armed, wearing vests, dedicated to protecting the citizens of their good city) who couldn't stop a few bag guys from killing and injuring 20 people. Video shows very courageous unarmed bystanders take down a suspect. It kinda shoots that rhetoric full of holes, doesn't it? The availabity of guns is a problem. That point can't be argued.
We've all heard it...the NRA rhetoric. It takes a ... (show quote)


Some times the bad guys are faster.

Reply
Feb 17, 2024 15:03:12   #
Effate Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.
 
mikee wrote:
We've all heard it...the NRA rhetoric. It takes a good guy with a gun to stop a bad guy with a gun. Well, what happened in KC yesterday then? There were 800 good guys (police; highly trained, all armed, wearing vests, dedicated to protecting the citizens of their good city) who couldn't stop a few bag guys from killing and injuring 20 people. Video shows very courageous unarmed bystanders take down a suspect. It kinda shoots that rhetoric full of holes, doesn't it? The availabity of guns is a problem. That point can't be argued.
We've all heard it...the NRA rhetoric. It takes a ... (show quote)


The availability of guns “in the wrong hands” is a problem not the availability of guns. Additionally, when I leave my home with a concealed weapon I don’t do it with the intention of getting in a gun fight. I realize that if someone unknown to me is able to direct rounds in my direction before I recognize the threat he/she may win that fight but short of that if I have the time to respond then I would hope I would have the presence to engage. I will not unnecessarily allow myself or those around me to be victimized. One may not always win but one would hope your in the fight rather than huddled in the corner hoping you’re not the next to catch one.

Reply
Feb 17, 2024 17:40:34   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
mikee wrote:
We've all heard it...the NRA rhetoric. It takes a good guy with a gun to stop a bad guy with a gun. Well, what happened in KC yesterday then? There were 800 good guys (police; highly trained, all armed, wearing vests, dedicated to protecting the citizens of their good city) who couldn't stop a few bag guys from killing and injuring 20 people. Video shows very courageous unarmed bystanders take down a suspect. It kinda shoots that rhetoric full of holes, doesn't it? The availabity of guns is a problem. That point can't be argued.
We've all heard it...the NRA rhetoric. It takes a ... (show quote)


If people will bother to look at the video footage, they may clearly observe some “Good Guys” WITHOUT guns tackling one of the perps. And a woman sequestering the gun the perp had been carrying.

The REASON the perps were not stopped by the hypothetical Good Guy(s) With Gun(s), is pretty damn obvious:
The Good Guys were obeying the law(s)! NOT carrying in a public location. NOT breaking the law!

The “Good Guys” were aware that carrying a gun in such a crowd (let alone USING IT) could endanger more than possibly protect.


It was Criminals who broke laws, not responsible gun owners.

Reply
Feb 17, 2024 18:01:04   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
Merlin1300 wrote:
Fool. What criminal is going to adhere to ANY additional laws. It is against the law to discharge a firearm in public. It is against the law to shoot someone unless your life is in imminent danger. Your left wing politicos are now at catch and release - so right back on the street. Good Guys didn't need guns in this situation to capture immature children (probably gang bangers) who had acquired firearms. Their guns were empty - so just take 'em down. Those who were actually shot or killed were simply innocent bystanders - NOT actively targeted. Good guys with guns will stop bad guys in a hostage situation or an active shooter situation. KC was neither.
THIS was over in seconds. No time to neutralize ANY of the shooters till they ran out of ammo. THEN it was DONE.
Had this BEEN a prolonged situation - a good guy WOULD have taken them out.
Ohh Crap - I got sucked into the dungeon again.
Fool. What criminal is going to adhere to ANY addi... (show quote)


Hey, while we are in the dungeon, I have an airsoft gun, want to hunt cockroaches for fun?
I once saw a cop who got bored during break time of a training exercise hunting them in a dumpster with a fully automatic paintball training Uzi look alike. Some very colorful cockroaches around the dumpster for a few days.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.