Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why card readers?
Page <<first <prev 7 of 11 next> last>>
Feb 3, 2024 13:38:33   #
Artcameraman Loc: Springfield NH
 
I do the fastest.

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 13:50:12   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
gvarner wrote:
Why would anyone use a card reader when there are more direct ways to load photos onto a computer, like using a USB cable?
Reasons I can think of, for the card are (1) because cards are 10x faster and (2) cards don’t run the camera battery down, and (3) I don’t have to deal with two devices operating systems and (4) I don’t need a cord, another thing to break or loose or forget on a trip.

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 13:53:53   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
robertjerl wrote:
Yes I do, but in the case of the phone, that tiny macro card is more of a hassle for me to remove and replace than the cable. Fat stubby finger syndrome.
At my desk, I use tweezers for handling the tiny cards.
The tweezers etc. is the wading through I am referring to. I could have worded it better.
I despise those micro cards, they are too difficult to handle with old fingers and too easy to loose. They make sense for drones but that’s about it

Reply
 
 
Feb 3, 2024 13:56:42   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
I’ve never heard of scratching a card being an issue. I use multiple different cameras with different connectors. My card readers are what stay plugged in. I also don’t put the card back in the camera until I verify the copy and reformat the card right then. I also have enough going on on top of my desk that I don’t need a camera cluttering it more.
In all my many years using many cards I have never scratched one, (how would a scratch even matter? It not a vinyl record) and I have only had one card fail. And the manufacturer replaced the failed card for free.

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 14:00:39   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
Alafoto wrote:
As do I. A habit formed back in the day, when battery life was not so consistent nor as long lasting as today.
The old days are the new days, mirrorless cameras suck batteries dry at an amazing rate.

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 14:04:35   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
JD750 wrote:
I despise those micro cards, they are too difficult to handle with old fingers and too easy to loose. They make sense for drones but that’s about it



My micros are in their own adapters.
The micros with adapters were on sale at the time.

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 14:14:47   #
catgirl Loc: las vegas
 
Timmers wrote:
Why? Because there is a card reader built into the front of the computer. So the computer is a "card reader" itself, and the computer recognizes the card being inserted. Then the compute has opened the card to be read. You are suppose to remove all the images and place them into the file you create to download to that file. You can then deleat the content of the card to clear it for the next use, AFTER confirming the file has the downloaded images. This of course becomes the master file for those images. Any action to ANY iage is then done on a copy folder of all the images. It is called the protocol for image management. Tat first folders is ALWAYS marked MASTER, the copy folder is called WORK. In this manner you don't end up with any failed images or files.

In addition to all this EVERY FOLDER receives two (2) designations, first the date day, month, year 022324 ( second month, the day and then the year 24), the second identifier that can be used to search is perhaps the person's name, location, ect. so a search of thousands of files can be located easily.

Final, and without fail, the MASTER folder is up loaded to your external memory and then secured. All this before you begin to play with your images in the WORK folder.
Why? Because there is a card reader built into the... (show quote)


My previous Mac did have a slot for my cards this new one does not so now I will need to use a card reader, preferred using the slot was so much easier

Reply
 
 
Feb 3, 2024 14:26:35   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
catgirl wrote:
My previous Mac did have a slot for my cards this new one does not so now I will need to use a card reader, preferred using the slot was so much easier
My old MacBookPro had a SD slot, my middle MacBookPro did not, I was unhappy with that every time I downloaded pics. My newest MacBookPro has the SD slot. People complained, Apple listened. Now you have a reason to buy another Mac. ;)

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 15:20:29   #
Alafoto Loc: Montgomery, AL
 
JD750 wrote:
The old days are the new days, mirrorless cameras suck batteries dry at an amazing rate.


Afraid a mirrorless is a bucket list item for me.

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 15:33:14   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
Of course, another alternative is WiFi if your camera supports it.

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 16:40:08   #
MJPerini
 
If it makes you happy to connect your camera by wire by all means do that.

Most modern card readers are way faster than any camera connection AND you can have multiple card readers.
There is a good work flow security reason as well when you come home from a shoot camera gets put away, card (s) go in a small box at the computer, as each card is transferred to the computer it goes in the "In Process box)
It stays there until all cards are ingested, and all backups are made, including off site or cloud. Once backups are made the card goes in the OK to reformat bin. 3 little plastic bins is great insurance and the whole process is easy and protected
We do the same thing weather shooting for clients or personal work
The camera never has to be out on a desk, no wear and tear on tiny internal connections.
If you do the same exact thing every time, you never have the risk of losing anything.

Reply
 
 
Feb 3, 2024 17:41:55   #
photoman43
 
MJPerini wrote:
If it makes you happy to connect your camera by wire by all means do that.

Most modern card readers are way faster than any camera connection AND you can have multiple card readers.
There is a good work flow security reason as well when you come home from a shoot camera gets put away, card (s) go in a small box at the computer, as each card is transferred to the computer it goes in the "In Process box)
It stays there until all cards are ingested, and all backups are made, including off site or cloud. Once backups are made the card goes in the OK to reformat bin. 3 little plastic bins is great insurance and the whole process is easy and protected
We do the same thing weather shooting for clients or personal work
The camera never has to be out on a desk, no wear and tear on tiny internal connections.
If you do the same exact thing every time, you never have the risk of losing anything.
If it makes you happy to connect your camera by wi... (show quote)


When I got my first Nikon digital camera, a D200, way back when, I went to a Nikon School program that recommended to always use a card reader to download images. At that time they did not recommend using any computer's built in card reader slot as there was always a small chance that the computer could transfer something to the card that then got transferred to the camera. I know that many pho pho such recommendations, but I always wanted to follow the safest and most secure way to do things.

Being able to download directly from a camera can be a plus as well as recharging the battery without removing it from a camera. But what if a power strike takes place when you are doing this? I know this is a remote event, but things like this do happen from time to time, especially when you are in unfamiliar environments like a foreign country.

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 19:31:15   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
delder wrote:
Agree!
One card reader for several different Camera Makes and Models.
I velcro'ed a amall Card Reader right on top of my Desktop to keep from wearing out the Internal Computer Card Reader.


Now that’s crazy talk. That computer will be obsolete before the card reader wears out.

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 21:00:42   #
niteman3d Loc: South Central Pennsylvania, USA
 
JD750 wrote:
I despise those micro cards, they are too difficult to handle with old fingers and too easy to loose. They make sense for drones but that’s about it


I thought my Nikon 1 V1 was just about a perfect all-around camera for the snapshooter... except for that nasty little card slot.

Reply
Feb 3, 2024 21:17:21   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Now that’s crazy talk. That computer will be obsolete before the card reader wears out.



My computer did after 12 years. Card reader still worked though.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.