Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Fatal Crash - Now What?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Jan 31, 2024 10:40:58   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
What gets me is those people who start their signal as they start their turn.


But don't turn it off.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 10:45:20   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
jerryc41 wrote:
But don't turn it off.

It happens when the turn is not sharp enough to trigger the turn-off mechanism.
I have three intersections near me where that happens. Not sharp turns.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 10:47:16   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Longshadow wrote:
It happens when the turn is not sharp enough to trigger the turn-off mechanism.
I have three intersections near me where that happens. Not sharp turns.


Right, and I have quite a few of those near me.

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2024 11:00:27   #
wmurnahan Loc: Bloomington IN
 
tradio wrote:
Round-a-bouts seem to be the big thing around here lately. I think the idea came from Europe? I have no statistics on any safety improvements these intersections provide.


Since they eliminate t-bone, they make a safer intersection and the studies back it. At worst you get a rear end or side swipe accident, much lower casualty rate. Now they are starting to change multi highway crossing, making going straight across by requiring anyone wanting to turn left or cross to instead turn right and go up to a turn around, this also increases safety by eliminating t-bones.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 12:36:33   #
razw33 Loc: Livermore, CA
 
The car took control......

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 13:03:23   #
twb930s Loc: Aldie, Virginia
 
jerryc41 wrote:
I wonder if that model is self-driving? It seems to be a base model.


I think they are all self driving - if you have the self driving software package option.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 13:37:50   #
John H. Loc: Central Washington State
 
tradio wrote:
Round-a-bouts seem to be the big thing ....


The Great left-coast State of Washington has been installing round-a-bouts.
They are less expensive than, say, an overpass with ramps, etc.
The approach is marked, speed drops to 35, then 25 miles per hour.
Accidents still happen but at much slower speeds. Crumpled fenders beat broken bones.

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2024 14:43:05   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
Haenzel wrote:
Self driving cars are better off amongst self driving cars...As long as conventional cars are in play I don't consider self driving cars a safer option...


Your post does not evidently consider the collisions of driverless vehicles with barricades, emergency vehicles, traffic re-direction signage and so forth.

What comes to mind regarding self-directed vehicles is: “Not ready for prime time.”

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 14:54:34   #
Haenzel Loc: South Holland, The Netherlands
 
Wyantry wrote:
Your post does not evidently consider the collisions of driverless vehicles with barricades, emergency vehicles, traffic re-direction signage and so forth.

What comes to mind regarding self-directed vehicles is: “Not ready for prime time.”


I think my post was pretty clear? I also think "Not ready for prime time." It will take at least another 10 years before it's really safe. Real time information, which is partly still missing, and communication between vehicles, can make those cars safer.

My view: If you don't want to drive take a taxi, bus or train...

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 15:36:21   #
NDMarks Loc: Dublin, Ca
 
This "accident" is, of course, awful. I do have a couple of things I would like to add. I drove a tractor/trailer for 20 years. I do know that using a cell phone while driving is a violation of Federal Law and if proven, could cost the driver his/her license. Trucks are governed by state laws but also by federal laws. California law allows hands-free phone use while Federal law forbids it. Another thing to keep in mind is how long it takes to stop a big rig. On the other hand, we had a case here where the driver dropped a lit cigarette and while reaching down for it, swerved into the path of another vehicle, killing the driver. I always was leery about driving on rural roads.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 15:45:45   #
chrissybabe Loc: New Zealand
 
Longshadow wrote:
Of which 90% of the people are either unaware or don't care.

I would question your 90%. My experience is about 96%. If you had to resit your practical and failed to indicate a turn properly then your licence should be instantly revoked on the spot until you could demonstrate your ability to do it properly. State income would rise quite a bit from relicensing fees, and the road toll might drop to half.

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2024 15:47:19   #
chrissybabe Loc: New Zealand
 
In New Zealand a turn appears to be more indicated by seeing the stop light come on first.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 16:36:20   #
Drbobcameraguy Loc: Eaton Ohio
 
sippyjug104 wrote:
All of the greatest medical researchers that have ever lived, as well as modern medical science, have yet been able to find a cure for stupidity. Each time they come up with something that is "idiot proof", up comes better idiots.


I personally believe that a .45 injection will usually cure stupidity if injected in the correct place. Lol lol

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 16:40:58   #
radiomantom Loc: Plymouth Indiana
 
jerryc41 wrote:
There was a fatal crash on a local highway recently, and two high school students were killed. The driver of a tractor trailer saw a car stopped to make a turn. He hit the car, swerved into the opposite lane, and hit two other cars, killing the students. This is a tragedy, of course, but is there a solution?

The state is going to study the intersection to see if changes are needed. There will be a long, expensive study, but changing the road configuration isn't going to make drivers keep their eyes on the road. From what's been written in the newspaper, the truck driver saw the stopped car too late. If the state recommends leaving the intersection as it is, I'm sure people will complain. I've lived here for over fifty years, and this is the first time I've heard of an accident occurring there. I wonder if the truck driver was texting or otherwise distracted. How else could he not see a car that was stopped in front of him?

In other crash news, a woman across the Hudson River "lost control" of her Tesla and ran into a car coming from the opposite direction - two people hospitalized. I wonder if she lost control or if the car lost control.

https://www.caranddriver.com/tesla/model-3
There was a fatal crash on a local highway recentl... (show quote)


This takes place on a weekly basis n our region, mainly on I-65. You can't drive 15 miles down that interstate without seeing a big scorched area on the rd where a semi rear ended a passenger vehicle at 75 mph when the cars were backed up and stopped. Either half asleep or texting for sure.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 16:41:46   #
Jagnut07 Loc: South Carolina
 
Wyantry wrote:
EXCEPT for the numerous instances of self-driving cars running into emergency vehicles, road barriers, construction zones, police and fire vehicles or barricades.

Yeah, right, And there is a claim these self-drivers are somehow “safer”? This appears to be a completely Bovine Excrement (BS) claim!
An analysis of accidents per 1,000,000 of self-driving vehicles versus accidents per 1,000,000 driver-controlled vehicles or a similar analysis of accidents per 1,000,000 miles of self-driving versus human-driven vehicles would likely reveal more relevant data than mere conjecture.


This analysis has been done! And reveals:

The National Law Review reported that for every 1 million miles driven, there are 9.1 self-driving car crashes.
In comparison, conventional human-driven vehicles have a crash rate of 4.1 per million miles driven.

A study published by the peer-reviewed journal Transportation Research Procedia found that accidents involving autonomous vehicles were mostly rear-end collisions, while conventional vehicles were involved in more pedestrian and broadside accidents.

The statistics for autonomous vehicle crashes broke down as follows:

Rear-end accidents – 64.2%
Side-swipe accidents – 20.8%
Broadside accidents – 5.7%
Collisions with an object – 3.8%
Pedestrian accidents – 0%
“Other” accidents – 5.7%


In comparison, conventional vehicle crashes broke down as follows:

Rear-end accidents – 28.3%
Side-swipe accidents – 17.5%
Broadside accidents – 25.8%
Collisions with an object – 4.6%
Pedestrian accidents – 16.3%
“Other” accidents – 7.5%

https://www.nstlaw.com/autonomous-vehicle-statistics/
~~~~~~~~~~

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), self-driving cars resulted in at least 11 deaths in a four month period in 2022 across the US. Approximately 9.1 driverless car crashes occur per million miles driven. Sep 12, 2023
https://www.ctlawsc.com › autonomous
EXCEPT for the numerous instances of self-driving ... (show quote)


According to that same report: “ According to another study published in the Journal of Safety Research, about one-third of serious car crashes could be prevented by autonomous vehicles. However, self-driving cars also have room for improvement. Transportation Research Procedia study results show that errors leading to autonomous vehicle accidents were mainly unsafe speeds at 43.5 percent and following too closely at 26.1 percent.”. So can we presume autonomous vehicles are safer?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.