Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Fatal Crash - Now What?
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Jan 30, 2024 20:51:10   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
Self driving cars have a better safety record than human drivers. They keep their "eyes" on what's happening.


EXCEPT for the numerous instances of self-driving cars running into emergency vehicles, road barriers, construction zones, police and fire vehicles or barricades.

Yeah, right, And there is a claim these self-drivers are somehow “safer”? This appears to be a completely Bovine Excrement (BS) claim!
An analysis of accidents per 1,000,000 of self-driving vehicles versus accidents per 1,000,000 driver-controlled vehicles or a similar analysis of accidents per 1,000,000 miles of self-driving versus human-driven vehicles would likely reveal more relevant data than mere conjecture.


This analysis has been done! And reveals:

The National Law Review reported that for every 1 million miles driven, there are 9.1 self-driving car crashes.
In comparison, conventional human-driven vehicles have a crash rate of 4.1 per million miles driven.

A study published by the peer-reviewed journal Transportation Research Procedia found that accidents involving autonomous vehicles were mostly rear-end collisions, while conventional vehicles were involved in more pedestrian and broadside accidents.

The statistics for autonomous vehicle crashes broke down as follows:

Rear-end accidents – 64.2%
Side-swipe accidents – 20.8%
Broadside accidents – 5.7%
Collisions with an object – 3.8%
Pedestrian accidents – 0%
“Other” accidents – 5.7%


In comparison, conventional vehicle crashes broke down as follows:

Rear-end accidents – 28.3%
Side-swipe accidents – 17.5%
Broadside accidents – 25.8%
Collisions with an object – 4.6%
Pedestrian accidents – 16.3%
“Other” accidents – 7.5%

https://www.nstlaw.com/autonomous-vehicle-statistics/
~~~~~~~~~~

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), self-driving cars resulted in at least 11 deaths in a four month period in 2022 across the US. Approximately 9.1 driverless car crashes occur per million miles driven. Sep 12, 2023
https://www.ctlawsc.com › autonomous

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 06:05:15   #
Ollieboy
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
Self driving cars have a better safety record than human drivers. They keep their "eyes" on what's happening.


All 2 of them.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 06:37:08   #
Haenzel Loc: South Holland, The Netherlands
 
Wyantry wrote:
EXCEPT for the numerous instances of self-driving cars running into emergency vehicles, road barriers, construction zones, police and fire vehicles or barricades.

Yeah, right, And there is a claim these self-drivers are somehow “safer”? This appears to be a completely Bovine Excrement (BS) claim!
An analysis of accidents per 1,000,000 of self-driving vehicles versus accidents per 1,000,000 driver-controlled vehicles or a similar analysis of accidents per 1,000,000 miles of self-driving versus human-driven vehicles would likely reveal more relevant data than mere conjecture.


This analysis has been done! And reveals:

The National Law Review reported that for every 1 million miles driven, there are 9.1 self-driving car crashes.
In comparison, conventional human-driven vehicles have a crash rate of 4.1 per million miles driven.

A study published by the peer-reviewed journal Transportation Research Procedia found that accidents involving autonomous vehicles were mostly rear-end collisions, while conventional vehicles were involved in more pedestrian and broadside accidents.

The statistics for autonomous vehicle crashes broke down as follows:

Rear-end accidents – 64.2%
Side-swipe accidents – 20.8%
Broadside accidents – 5.7%
Collisions with an object – 3.8%
Pedestrian accidents – 0%
“Other” accidents – 5.7%


In comparison, conventional vehicle crashes broke down as follows:

Rear-end accidents – 28.3%
Side-swipe accidents – 17.5%
Broadside accidents – 25.8%
Collisions with an object – 4.6%
Pedestrian accidents – 16.3%
“Other” accidents – 7.5%

https://www.nstlaw.com/autonomous-vehicle-statistics/
~~~~~~~~~~

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), self-driving cars resulted in at least 11 deaths in a four month period in 2022 across the US. Approximately 9.1 driverless car crashes occur per million miles driven. Sep 12, 2023
https://www.ctlawsc.com › autonomous
EXCEPT for the numerous instances of self-driving ... (show quote)


Self driving cars are better off amongst self driving cars...As long as conventional cars are in play I don't consider self driving cars a safer option...

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2024 07:58:12   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Haenzel wrote:
Self driving cars are better off amongst self driving cars...As long as conventional cars are in play I don't consider self driving cars a safer option...

The problem is the human variable.
Humans are SO variable.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 08:27:33   #
agillot
 
Here in TX , side roads that cross an 75 mph freeway like road , too cheap to make overpass . Scary at time Ronald Reagan from 35 to cedar park is one of many like that .

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 08:29:24   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
chrissybabe wrote:
Watch out for round-a-bouts. In am effect to make them more usable here you are meant to indicate going into a round-a-bout and indicate when leaving. Yet one more distraction to a driver. The problem is that on the surface it seems a useful and courteous thing to do but in actuality it raises or causes jut as much confusion as before. By my estimation it is useful on about 10% of round-a-bouts with the other 90% it is just a nuisance. And imagine how this requirement would screw up a texter.


In our newish roundabout, there are two lanes, and drivers in the left lane are allowed to exit to the right. That has them crossing in front of the drivers in the right lane. What a stupid idea!

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 08:35:28   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
jerryc41 wrote:
In our newish roundabout, there are two lanes, and drivers in the left lane are allowed to exit to the right. That has them crossing in front of the drivers in the right lane. What a stupid idea!

It IS!

Even if not allowed, people will still do it.

I hate two lane circles for that reason.

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2024 08:36:11   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Longshadow wrote:
It IS!

Even if not allowed, people will still do it.

I hate two lane circles for that reason.


The circle is so small that 18-wheelers have to use both lanes.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 08:43:43   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
jerryc41 wrote:
The circle is so small that 18-wheelers have to use both lanes.


Reply
Jan 31, 2024 09:07:18   #
Morry Loc: Palm Springs, CA
 
chrissybabe wrote:
It depends on the shape of the round-a-bout (remember we drive on the left side). If 4 roads I treat it the same as a cross intersection. Taking the first road off it is a left turn (left blinker), next off road is the same as going straight through so no blinker, last off road (assuming you are not going back the way you came) is a right turn so right blinker. If you see these blinkers you know where the car is going. Most round-a-bouts are 4 roaders here. If multiple roads off the round-a-bout then it is usually larger so if you see a car going round with a left blinker going what does it tell you that is useful ? It tells you that maybe the driver just forgot to turn his blinker off, or it can mean he turned it on early and is planning on turning off at some stage. You just don't know. Maybe he is going around twice (it happens) so no blinker yet. Personally I wait until it is obvious where the car is going. So blinkers mean nothing and do not help. If blinkers were so important then why aren't they made bigger and more obvious and a standardised shape and position ?
My grandfather never had an accident. He used to drive and treat other road users as if they were lunatics. I try and do the same.
It depends on the shape of the round-a-bout (remem... (show quote)


I live in Palm Springs, CA. Here I would (in a undocumented way) guesstimate that from 50% to 80% of driver do NOT use their turn signals. When I am behind these people . . . I need to guess what they are going to do. Good luck.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 09:13:03   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Morry wrote:
I live in Palm Springs, CA. Here I would (in a undocumented way) guesstimate that from 50% to 80% of driver do NOT use their turn signals. When I am behind these people . . . I need to guess what they are going to do. Good luck.

Yea, your area is not the only place where that occurs.

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2024 09:14:56   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Morry wrote:
I live in Palm Springs, CA. Here I would (in a undocumented way) guesstimate that from 50% to 80% of driver do NOT use their turn signals. When I am behind these people . . . I need to guess what they are going to do. Good luck.


In NY, 100' before turning is the law.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 09:19:07   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
jerryc41 wrote:
In NY, 100' before turning is the law.

Of which 90% of the people are either unaware or don't care.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 10:07:30   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
Morry wrote:
I live in Palm Springs, CA. Here I would (in a undocumented way) guesstimate that from 50% to 80% of driver do NOT use their turn signals. When I am behind these people . . . I need to guess what they are going to do. Good luck.


What gets me is those people who start their signal as they start their turn. Unclear on the concept.

Reply
Jan 31, 2024 10:11:09   #
Ruthlessrider
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Or inattentive.


I would instinctively say more people need to get tickets for being on their phones while driving, but too often I see police officers on their phones or looking at the computer perched on a console. Someone should build signal blockers into the cockpit of cars.

With adaptive cruise control it is easy to find people who are suddenly on the phone. There are many times I am following a car using ACC on the Interstate, following at two or three car lengths, and all of a sudden the car slows precipitously, yup the guys on the phone. If I continue to follow (which I’ve done out of curiosity), all of a sudden the car speeds up (the guy just hung up). If people would just learn to use the technology available in almost all newer cars, perhaps there would fewer accidents.

People involved in accidents should have to automatically surrender their phones and if there is evidence that shows they were on the phone when the accident occurs, they should automatically be ticketed for causing the accident. I may be an old curmudgeon on this issue, but it is just too easy to hit the red button on the phone or console or pull safely over to take the call if it is that important.

End of rant!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.