Cragzop wrote:
With all due respect, how is your diatribe any different?
You chastise people for buying non refillable ink tank printers. I had an Epson 8550, and all I can say is the photographs printed were subpar. This is a photography group
I understand your comments, and yeah some people are rude and condescending, but you just committed the same crime.
“ Someone else said they would only buy HP cartridges -- I have an answer for that -- professional equipment like printers using eight or more cartridges notwithstanding, if you own a printer that you paid a couple of hundred dollars for, you didn't buy a printer, you bought into a very expensive ink program. Those lower-priced printers are so cheap because when you buy one, HP, Canon, or any others the manufacturer has you by the balls! You will be paying through the nose for your ink. Epson, and now Canon and HP have printers that use tanks which are easy to fill and cost a fraction of what cartridges do.”
You may have taken a different tack, but you’re still criticizing somebody’s buying habits.
With all due respect, how is your diatribe any dif... (
show quote)
I normally don't criticize people for their choices but it was a jab at someone who felt HP cartridges were the have-all and do-all of printer ink.