burkphoto wrote:
The so-called 1" sensor is much smaller than Micro 4/3 sensors. So the actual focal length required for an equivalent field of view on m43 would be much longer. That means more glass, more weight, tighter tolerances, and more issues with chromatic aberrations, coma, astigmatism, etc. Long ratio zooms are not known for their great performance. That's why pros limit their zooms to 4:1 or 3:1 ratios. We want great performance across the range, preferably at wide apertures (wide open to two stops down).
I'd rather carry two or three zooms with great performance than one mediocre one that costs the same as the three good ones.
The so-called 1" sensor is much smaller than ... (
show quote)
You have obviously never used the RX10M4 - the zoom lens performance is NOT mediocre .... why not carry ONE zoom with GREAT performance ?? Having used Canon L primes, I can assure you I know GREAT performance when I see it....and the RX10 zoom has it ! - wide open - no stopping down....
M4/3 needs a W-I-D-E zoom that goes to 300mm with an f-stop in the 4's - that would make me a customer. It would not be horrifically large ! 77mm filters. I need 600mm equiv - like the RX 10 - without extenders - Zeiss has done it ! And yes, I know it defies all conventional logic regarding zooms.
.