A game changer with Sony (Page 6): Surely production models will give a complete picture, but it isn't about processing as you stated. The pre-production A9III models have proved the...

gwilliams6

rehess wrote:

We will know once it has been released.

Surely production models will give a complete picture, but it isn't about processing as you stated. The pre-production A9III models have proved the processing.

And the latest tests and reviews out this week, now that A9III raw files are able to be opened, has confirmed the dynamic range and noise is equal to the current A9II, which does not have any of the features of a global shutter.

Full production firmware and any other tweeks coming before the late February 2024 release (release date according to B&H camera) will just add to what we know already about the A9III.

Cheers and best to you.

rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA

gwilliams6 wrote:

Surely production models will give a complete picture, but it isn't about processing as you stated. The pre-production A9III models have proved the processing.

We will know when it is released.
All we get now is verbiage from supporters.

gwilliams6

rehess wrote:

We will know when it is released.
All we get now is verbiage from supporters.

Wrong, we are getting real-world A9III raw images and test results from respected independent testers from around the world. Please do real research before making yourself look uninformed and just a hater.

Cheers and best to you.

rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA

gwilliams6 wrote:

Wrong, we are getting real-world A9III raw images and test results from respected independent testers from around the world. Please do real research before making yourself look uninformed and just a hater.

I don’t trust those who have that camera now.
We will know when it has been released and truly independent people {instead of ‘cheerleaders’} use it; only then will real research be possible.

gwilliams6

rehess wrote:

I don’t trust those who have that camera now.
We will know when it has been released and truly independent people {instead of ‘cheerleaders’} use it; only then will real research be possible.

The respected independent testers that have made numerous real-world A9III tests are NOT cheerleaders, LOL

I wont respond again to someone who isn't living in reality. No one will take you seriously here, sorry .

Cheers and best to you.

rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA

gwilliams6 wrote:

The respected independent testers that have made numerous real-world A9III tests are NOT cheerleaders, LOL

I wont respond again to someone who isn't living in reality. No one will take you seriously here, sorry .

Cheers and best to you.

You - head ‘cheerleader’ - won’t.
Is not responding a promise?

Grahame Loc: Fiji

rehess wrote:

I don’t trust those who have that camera now.

You could make a far more compelling case if you actually came up with some technicalities and something substantiative as to why. Or is that beyond you?

rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA

Grahame wrote:

You could make a far more compelling case if you actually came up with some technicalities and something substantiative as to why. Or is that beyond you?

I’m not trying to make any sort of ‘case’. I simply don’t know whether it gives good images. We will know more when it is in the hands of people not beholden to Sony. Punct.

Grahame Loc: Fiji

rehess wrote:

I’m not trying to make any sort of ‘case’.

Ah, so just showing your ignorance of all the information that is around to date?

rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA

Grahame wrote:

Ah, so just showing your ignorance of all the information that is around to date?

There is zero real information out so far, just hype, until it has been released and independent photographers have had a chance to use it!!

Grahame Loc: Fiji

rehess wrote:

There is zero real information out so far, just hype, until it has been released and independent photographers have had a chance to use it!!

Why not just admit, you don't want or need one to assist your photography rather that continuing to show your biased ignorance.

rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA

Grahame wrote:

Why not just admit, you don't want or need one to assist your photography rather that continuing to show your biased ignorance.

I have zero need for the claimed benefits of the new camera, zero interest in a MILC - I’m much more interested in the new film camera that Pentax may also release during the upcoming Spring. That MILC will have zero impact upon the photographs that I take. Incidentally, my photography is part of “everything” - but it won’t be touched by this thing.

Grahame Loc: Fiji

rehess wrote:

I have zero need for the claimed benefits of the new camera, zero interest in a MILC - I’m much more interested in the new film camera that Pentax may also release during the upcoming Spring. That MILC will have zero impact upon the photographs that I take. Incidentally, my photography is part of “everything” - but it won’t be touched by this thing.

That was pretty obvious, your negativity and lack of anything technically substantive fully supports your comments.

rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA

Grahame wrote:

That was pretty obvious, your negativity and lack of anything technically substantive fully supports your comments.

I have no camera that cost $6000 new, or even $3000 new, or even $1500 new. I set my Pentax to the slowest burst rate. I still think of Sony cameras as having a strange menu system, while enjoying the mechanical external controls of my Pentax DSLRs. What you describe as “lack of anything technical” is total total lack of interest in Sony products and seeing ther having zero place in my future.

gwilliams6

Grahame wrote:

Ah, so just showing your ignorance of all the information that is around to date?