gwilliams6 wrote:
It is wonderfully sharp from foreground to background on my 4K monitor. But of course with UHH photo compression and image file size restrictions, you wont see all the resolution and image quality here in UHH. It cant be posted at full 61mp image resolution here in UHH, but you must know that by now. Be sure to click on download to see better image quality, but it still can't be full 61mp resolution here in UHH.
And of course my creative choice of 1/80 second shutter speed was to show motion in the water crashing against the rocks.
With 50 year as a National and International Award-winning and successful working pro, shooting all subjects around the world, I know how to get the most out of my equipment, no problem.
BTW, a huge full-resolution print of this shot has been exhibited in museums.
Cheers and best to you.
It is wonderfully sharp from foreground to backgro... (
show quote)
Your uploaded image is about a 6 mpx file for the internet. The ability to view the original 61 mpxl size image , pixel peep, or for anyone to magnify the image to any degree for inspection won't work, its now a small file. non the less, sharpness or resolution hasn't changed or been degraded.
If anything your image should appear sharper and more resolute when downsized because the large original data file was so detailed. It is impossible for anyone to inspect or expand your 6 mpxl file enough online for any kind of meaningful assessment. Best to crop part of your image from your full size original file and post that for a better explanation of resolution and sharpness results...
I do like the image, cheers
zarathu
Loc: Bar Harbor, MDI, Maine
CHG_CANON wrote:
If we gave two people a digital camera and lens, and after a week we learned one camera has twice as many pixels at the other, who do you think was the better photographer?
the one with the most pixels---everybody knows that. ;-0
zarathu wrote:
the one with the most pixels---everybody knows that. ;-0
You and CHG_CANON are everybody??
User ID wrote:
Pearls before swine.
Now that comment is humor!
Nigel7
Loc: Worcestershire. UK.
It might have a lot of pixels but the colour is totally over the top. Dreadful!! Is the camera responsible or the photographer?
Give me my Canons and respect for realism every time.
None. I use a 20.9 mp D500 and D7500. It's plenty for me.
Nigel7 wrote:
It might have a lot of pixels but the colour is totally over the top. Why do people do this?????
Do what?
Using Quote Reply works wonders.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.