Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Informal poll: What 61MP body do you use ?
Page <<first <prev 9 of 25 next> last>>
Dec 22, 2023 03:58:19   #
imagextrordinair Loc: Halden, Norway
 
gwilliams6 wrote:
It is wonderfully sharp from foreground to background on my 4K monitor. But of course with UHH photo compression and image file size restrictions, you wont see all the resolution and image quality here in UHH. It cant be posted at full 61mp image resolution here in UHH, but you must know that by now. Be sure to click on download to see better image quality, but it still can't be full 61mp resolution here in UHH.

And of course my creative choice of 1/80 second shutter speed was to show motion in the water crashing against the rocks.

With 50 year as a National and International Award-winning and successful working pro, shooting all subjects around the world, I know how to get the most out of my equipment, no problem.

BTW, a huge full-resolution print of this shot has been exhibited in museums.

Cheers and best to you.
It is wonderfully sharp from foreground to backgro... (show quote)


Your uploaded image is about a 6 mpx file for the internet. The ability to view the original 61 mpxl size image , pixel peep, or for anyone to magnify the image to any degree for inspection won't work, its now a small file. non the less, sharpness or resolution hasn't changed or been degraded.

If anything your image should appear sharper and more resolute when downsized because the large original data file was so detailed. It is impossible for anyone to inspect or expand your 6 mpxl file enough online for any kind of meaningful assessment. Best to crop part of your image from your full size original file and post that for a better explanation of resolution and sharpness results...

I do like the image, cheers

Reply
Dec 22, 2023 07:15:44   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
User ID wrote:
As I have noted, it is not MY judgement that cameras below 50 to 60MP are inferior. Its the owners who apparently feel that way. They all crowd into a poll concerning high rez cameras with their unsolicited defensive remarks about not owning the type of camera included in the poll. Thaz how theyre displaying THEIR OWN dark feelings that their 12 to 24MP cameras are just damnt uglee children. No one asked them. They all volunteered.


Reply
Dec 22, 2023 07:15:57   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Harry13 wrote:
"That's why I've had my 18MP for, oh, 13 years?"

Not trying to outdo you Longshadow but I've had my 5D for longer than that, when I got it is lost in the mists of time. Harry


Reply
 
 
Dec 22, 2023 09:51:37   #
zarathu Loc: Bar Harbor, MDI, Maine
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
If we gave two people a digital camera and lens, and after a week we learned one camera has twice as many pixels at the other, who do you think was the better photographer?


the one with the most pixels---everybody knows that. ;-0

Reply
Dec 22, 2023 10:00:30   #
EJMcD
 
zarathu wrote:
the one with the most pixels---everybody knows that. ;-0


You and CHG_CANON are everybody??

Reply
Dec 22, 2023 10:19:42   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
EJMcD wrote:
You and CHG_CANON are everybody??

It was Humor......

Reply
Dec 22, 2023 10:19:45   #
jonjacobik Loc: Quincy, MA
 
7aR5

Reply
 
 
Dec 22, 2023 10:22:42   #
wapiti Loc: round rock, texas
 
larryepage wrote:
1. 45 MP is way plenty for me. Sometimes too much.
2. I do not chase resolution.



Reply
Dec 22, 2023 10:29:55   #
EJMcD
 
Longshadow wrote:
Humor......


You know it!

Reply
Dec 22, 2023 12:24:32   #
User ID
 
Longshadow wrote:
It was Humor......

Pearls before swine.
Pearls before swine....
(Download)

Reply
Dec 22, 2023 12:26:29   #
User ID
 
jonjacobik wrote:
7aR5

Welkome, Pilgrimme ;-)

Reply
 
 
Dec 22, 2023 12:29:25   #
EJMcD
 
User ID wrote:
Pearls before swine.


Now that comment is humor!

Reply
Dec 22, 2023 12:52:07   #
Nigel7 Loc: Worcestershire. UK.
 
It might have a lot of pixels but the colour is totally over the top. Dreadful!! Is the camera responsible or the photographer?

Give me my Canons and respect for realism every time.

Reply
Dec 22, 2023 12:55:50   #
tdozier3 Loc: Northern Illinois
 
None. I use a 20.9 mp D500 and D7500. It's plenty for me.

Reply
Dec 22, 2023 12:56:34   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Nigel7 wrote:
It might have a lot of pixels but the colour is totally over the top. Why do people do this?????

Do what?

Using Quote Reply works wonders.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 25 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.