Longshadow wrote:
Do what?
Using Quote Reply works wonders.
He might be talking about the Golden Gate Bridge pic. Or maybe it's the pigs 'n pearls one?
davyboy wrote:
Are you sure this is 61 megapixels? Looks a lot like 16 megapixels still pretty
duh, I cant post a 61mp image in UHH, it has a limit to image size. I thought everyone knew that. So I had to reduce its size to be able to share it here. UHH doesnt like much over 20mb
In compressed raw format that I shot it, it is 61mb in size, trust me. If I had shot it in uncompressed raw the file size would have been over 100mb.
Cheers
joer
Loc: Colorado/Illinois
User ID wrote:
Simple question.
Where will it lead ?
I had the A7R4 until the A1 came out. The images were excellent and the resolution allowed for huge crops. Sadly, it suffered from rolling shutter.
imagextrordinair wrote:
Your uploaded image is about a 6 mpx file for the internet. The ability to view the original 61 mpxl size image , pixel peep, or for anyone to magnify the image to any degree for inspection won't work, its now a small file. non the less, sharpness or resolution hasn't changed or been degraded.
If anything your image should appear sharper and more resolute when downsized because the large original data file was so detailed. It is impossible for anyone to inspect or expand your 6 mpxl file enough online for any kind of meaningful assessment. Best to crop part of your image from your full size original file and post that for a better explanation of resolution and sharpness results...
I do like the image, cheers
Your uploaded image is about a 6 mpx file for the ... (
show quote)
It was a 16mb jpeg file when uploaded into UHH. UHH compression takes over from there. I had reduced it from its original 61mb compressed raw file to the 16mb jpeg file size.
I have uploaded hundreds of photos here in UHH over the years. Thank you
Cheers and best to you.
joer wrote:
I had the A7R4 until the A1 came out. The images were excellent and the resolution allowed for huge crops. Sadly, it suffered from rolling shutter.
Yes all current 61mp sensors are non-stacked BSI CMOS sensors. Rolling shutter can be an issue for fast pan shots and fast moving subjects in stills and video in electronic shutter shooting, not so much in mechanical shutter for stills.
Even the fastest stacked BSI sensors in 45mp Nikon Z9/Z8 , and 24mp Canon R3 mirrorless cameras as well as the 24mm A9/A9II and 50mp stacked sensor in the Sony A1 are still rolling shutter sensors, just much faster reading so rolling shutter effect is greatly reduced, but NOT totally eliminated like in a global shutter sensor camera.
Cheers
If you need to use a 1000 words to explain your 61MP image, you're doing it wrong ....
CHG_CANON wrote:
If you need to use a 1000 words to explain your 61MP image, you're doing it wrong ....
I agree.
Some dont understand how UHH image compression, UHH image size limitations, and individuals' monitor resolutions contribute to reduced resolution image quality folks can actually see here from any 61mp sensor image posted.
Cheers and best to you.
Hahahahahaha - 10 pages of responses to a poll that is only relevant to Sony Alpha 7R IV owners.
tgreenhaw wrote:
Hahahahahaha - 10 pages of responses to a poll that is only relevant to Sony Alpha 7R IV owners.
And how many are responses relative to the question?
The UHH way....
Squirrel....
Myths are wonderful tools, suggesting talent and effort can overcome the lack of superior cameras.
tgreenhaw wrote:
Hahahahahaha - 10 pages of responses to a poll that is only relevant to Sony Alpha 7R IV owners.
FYI, Sony A7RIVa and Sony A7RV are also 61mp sensor cameras, not just A7RIV. And the A7RV was one of the top five best selling mirrorless cameras worldwide in 2023. More than many Nikon and Canon models in 2023, just a fact.
Cheers
gwilliams6 wrote:
Here a 61mp shot with my 61mp A7RIV and my Sigma Art 24-70mm f2.8 DG DN lens. The Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco, California , USA. 24mm, ISO 200, f8, 1/80 sec. handheld.
Nice shot of the Golden Gate Bridge :-)
tgreenhaw wrote:
Nice shot of the Golden Gate Bridge :-)
Thank you, Cheers and best to you.
Hasselblad 500 C/M. . . .
I agree, most folks dont need a 61mp sensor camera, just a fact.
If you can use the highest current resolution and detail available in a fullframe or medium format camera for portraits, fashion, landscapes, wildlife shots etc., then a 61mp sensor camera matched with lenses that can resolve that 61mp sensor, can be for you. But for full disclosure, high megapixel sensor cameras come with pros and cons for sure.
Cheers and best to you all. Continue to have fun making your great images, whatever your camera's megapixel count is.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.