MosheR wrote:
I hope this message finds everyone here well. I am a bit hesitant to post this, but something has been bothering me for some time, and I decided I had to get it off my chest. I am writing to express my deep frustration and disappointment with some of the members of this forum, specifically the disturbing trend of users who actively participate in discussions about equipment, techniques, and the intricacies of photography, but fail to share their actual work. They talk about GAS attacks, spend thousands of dollars they often claim they don’t have, on equipment they then don’t use. At least they don’t show us that they use it. As far as I can tell, they don’t post to any other forums either.
Photography is an art form meant to capture and convey moments, emotions, and stories. It is an act of creation, a way to connect and communicate with the world and with fellow photographers. However, a significant portion of our users seems to have lost sight of this fundamental aspect. Instead, they engage in endless debates about the esoteric details of lenses, shutter speeds, sensor sizes, file formats, and gear-related topics.
It is truly disheartening to witness such dedication to these technical aspects without a corresponding commitment to sharing the fruits of their labor – their photographs. Discussion about equipment and techniques is undoubtedly valuable, but they should be in service of the primary objective of photography: capturing and sharing images that inspire and evoke emotion.
As Theodore Roosevelt once said:
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”
In the context of photography forums, the "man in the arena" should be the individual who actively captures moments, share his/her work, and invite constructive criticism. He is the one who truly contributes to the growth of the photography community. It's time for those who hide behind technical jargon to join the ranks of those who dare to share their artistic creations.
I urge all of us prioritize the sharing of photographs alongside technical discussions. By doing so, we can foster a more vibrant and inspiring environment for photographers at all levels of expertise.
I hope this message finds everyone here well. I am... (
show quote)
I don't know about anyone else, but copyright concerns are chief among my reservations about posting. I've been burned three times (that I know of) over the last 20 years, by others lifting my images and using them in local advertising (across country where a relative saw it), on a calendar, and in a promotional mailing for a resort. It's not the loss of revenue that concerns me so much as the ethical and fairness issues of being ripped off.
I posted quite a few images here about a year or two ago, but thought the better of making a habit of it (again) after reading horror stories on another site. The author was traveling in another country and found one of his unmistakably unique images on a billboard! The funny thing is, he would have granted permission for free use, if they had asked, but they didn't. The agency probably figured the chances of a lawsuit were slim and none, since they were half way around the world.
This is a free site. Take all free advice, mine included, with a grain of salt. It may be quite valuable, or it may be specious or irrelevant, and often, with NO apologies, off-topic. (Everything is related to everything else eventually!) Only you can separate the gold from the mud and water in the stream, or hold an interesting thought for future reference.
That said, I've posted over 24,000 times here since 2014. Most of those posts have been in the spirit of helping people answer questions or solve problems where I have known expertise or at least believe I can offer sound advice. I spent 33 years in the photo industry professionally, and ten before that as a serious hobbyist and student. There are many great contributors here with similarly broad experience to share, and they are not all regular posters of images. None of us knows it all, but collectively, there is a lot of good information and advice and insight here.
I don't question others' authenticity, or require photographic evidence of it. It is obvious over time who provides genuine advice and who spouts nonsense. It is obvious who gets into arguments on points of technical trivia that don't amount to a rabbit pellet's worth of usefulness.
Part of online learning from forums is like going to seminars at a conference. You learn to expect that 80% of what you hear is a re-run of information you've heard over and over. That's simply reinforcement. Some of that is lies, damned lies, and statistics. Some of it is obvious, and some of it, frankly, we need to hear over and over until it clicks. Of the other 20%, 5% of that 20% is pure gold we haven't seen before. 15% of the top 20% is information we can use if we choose. 80% of the top 20% is information everyone needs to know as foundational.
As I told my daughter when she was about five, you may have to step in a lot of unpleasant piles on your way to finding the magic unicorn in the woods.
The way I see it, if you want to post images, bring 'em on. If you want to talk tech, bring that on, too. There are plenty of other forum topics on this site that appeal to the thousands of folks who visit.
If I have one complaint, it's simply that lurkers need to get over their shyness and dive in. Most devices can accommodate non-typists with a speech-to-text function of some sort (judicious proofreading recommended...).