Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Questions About the Canon EOS R7
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Sep 10, 2023 14:16:21   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
rehess wrote:
Do you think there is a problem with using F/22 for 35mm??


Yes, I think using f22 for ANYTHING except 4X5-8X10 is a problem - most especially diffraction.......maybe, if you were desperate for DOF at very close up on 35mm - less so.

I mean, are you really looking for DOF of the Moon @ infinity ?? .....otherwise, why punish yourself with 1/80 SS and/or a higher ISO ??

Reply
Sep 10, 2023 15:18:17   #
joecichjr Loc: Chicago S. Suburbs, Illinois, USA
 
Mojaveflyer wrote:
I treated myself to a R andR7 body this spring. The attached photo was shot two nights after the Super moon from my deck using the R7 body with my 100 - 400 mm EF lens. I processed it with Photoshop Elements including a final touch with DeNoise plug in. This was shot from my deck handheld. Shot at ISO 800, 1/80th, f22.


Beautiful. 🌝🌝🌝🌝🌝, but how did the letters get up there

Reply
Sep 10, 2023 15:38:53   #
tgreenhaw
 
rehess wrote:
Do you think there is a problem with using F/22 for 35mm??


f22 is definitely not the sweet spot for the 100-400L due to diffraction. f8 to f11 is the sweet spot according to my experience as well as the MTF curves. I wonder if that is the cause for the massive chromatic aberration in this example.

Reply
 
 
Sep 11, 2023 08:25:20   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
davidb1879 wrote:
I am toying with the idea of purchasing a Canon EOS R7 with an RF (image stabilized) 100-400 lens. I would like to be able to grab the camera quickly to photograph a moving subject without having to worry about camera shake. Ken Rockwell says with the R7 "You can leave your tripod at home." But watching a U tube review of the R7, I noticed that the reviewer had a tripod. Of course, image stabilization cannot prevent blurring from subject motion (although increasing shutter speed can.) If anyone uses an R7, I would appreciate it if you could share your experience with the R7's image stabilization. Thanks. Davidb.
I am toying with the idea of purchasing a Canon EO... (show quote)


The solution as you have already mention is high shutter speeds. The IBIS coupled with the IS of the lens will produce good results but shutter speed is always important when shooting moving objects with a long lens. I shoot with a Canon R5 and a 600mm lens and have no problem with blur but I am always aware of shutter speed. When shooting stationary objects I can shoot that 600mm lens with good results at slow shutter speeds, something like 1/100th as long as I am steady when holding the camera.

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 08:33:58   #
cmceagle
 
davidb1879 wrote:
I am toying with the idea of purchasing a Canon EOS R7 with an RF (image stabilized) 100-400 lens. I would like to be able to grab the camera quickly to photograph a moving subject without having to worry about camera shake. Ken Rockwell says with the R7 "You can leave your tripod at home." But watching a U tube review of the R7, I noticed that the reviewer had a tripod. Of course, image stabilization cannot prevent blurring from subject motion (although increasing shutter speed can.) If anyone uses an R7, I would appreciate it if you could share your experience with the R7's image stabilization. Thanks. Davidb.
I am toying with the idea of purchasing a Canon EO... (show quote)


Lots of good commentary. I use High Speed Continuous, not High speed Continuous +, to stay with 15 frames a second to avoid rolling shutter. With the RF 100-500 and shutter priority at 1/2000 sec in sunlight and 1/1600 with overcast and auto ISO I get tack sharp pictures when the auto focus locks on correctly. I have more challenges with the electronic shutter (time delays) and setting up the auto focus settings (refusing to lock onto subject). But that is a different conversation. I've also used the EF 100-400 MKII with EF to RF adapter and get great results.

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 14:08:01   #
cindo51
 
davidb1879 wrote:
I am toying with the idea of purchasing a Canon EOS R7 with an RF (image stabilized) 100-400 lens. I would like to be able to grab the camera quickly to photograph a moving subject without having to worry about camera shake. Ken Rockwell says with the R7 "You can leave your tripod at home." But watching a U tube review of the R7, I noticed that the reviewer had a tripod. Of course, image stabilization cannot prevent blurring from subject motion (although increasing shutter speed can.) If anyone uses an R7, I would appreciate it if you could share your experience with the R7's image stabilization. Thanks. Davidb.
I am toying with the idea of purchasing a Canon EO... (show quote)


I'm very interested in hearing the responses. I am considering switching from my 90D to an R7!

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 14:40:00   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
cindo51 wrote:
I'm very interested in hearing the responses. I am considering switching from my 90D to an R7!


Do it! Based on my experience in moving from the MKDIV to the R5 you will not be disappointed.

Reply
 
 
Sep 11, 2023 15:45:28   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
cindo51 wrote:
I'm very interested in hearing the responses. I am considering switching from my 90D to an R7!


Do it.
Better AF and speed.
Also if you come across a good deal on a vintage FD, FL or R lens the R7 uses them very well with an adapter.
Also ALL your EF lenses work perfectly with the R7. Once you use it you will not pickup your D90 again.
I kept my 7D but have yet to find a reason to use it over the greater versatility of the R7.
You can also get AF with teleconverters and small aperture lenses including eye AF and tracking.

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 17:06:52   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Architect1776 wrote:
Do it.
Better AF and speed.
Also if you come across a good deal on a vintage FD, FL or R lens the R7 uses them very well with an adapter.
Also ALL your EF lenses work perfectly with the R7. Once you use it you will not pickup your D90 again.
I kept my 7D but have yet to find a reason to use it over the greater versatility of the R7.
You can also get AF with teleconverters and small aperture lenses including eye AF and tracking.


How much VF lag is there for BIF using the mechanical shutter ?? Also, from what I can tell, the R7 mechanical shutter is very noisy - more so than the 80/90D ....

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 17:22:26   #
davidb1879
 
many thanks to all for sharing your insights with me. I am truly grateful. Davidb1789.

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 17:25:37   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
imagemeister wrote:
How much VF lag is there for BIF using the mechanical shutter ?? Also, from what I can tell, the R7 mechanical shutter is very noisy - more so than the 80/90D ....


And?
I have absolutely no interest in BIF, bores me, so your point?

Reply
 
 
Sep 11, 2023 18:23:25   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Architect1776 wrote:
And?
I have absolutely no interest in BIF, bores me, so your point?


My point is the R7 is not necessarily for bird/wildlife people - so everyone has to qualify their comments. The R7 was supposed to be for birds/wildlife - this was supposedly the MAIN reason for Canon making it and for most people buying it !

Right now I am favoring the 90D over the R7/10 - I am currently using 80D in Canon. I do want 10 FPS but I must also have tracking ability for fast moving subjects - which is the main reason for 10FPS !

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 18:55:01   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
imagemeister wrote:
My point is the R7 is not necessarily for bird/wildlife people - so everyone has to qualify their comments. The R7 was supposed to be for birds/wildlife - this was supposedly the MAIN reason for Canon making it and for most people buying it !

Right now I am favoring the 90D over the R7/10 - I am currently using 80D in Canon. I do want 10 FPS but I must also have tracking ability for fast moving subjects - which is the main reason for 10FPS !


The focus systems on the new R series cameras are much improved over their DSLRs, especially their tracking capabilities. I have not done much research on the R7 as I am completely happy with my full frame for any situation including birding, much improved over my MKIV.

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 19:15:58   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
The focus systems on the new R series cameras are much improved over their DSLRs, especially their tracking capabilities. I have not done much research on the R7 as I am completely happy with my full frame for any situation including birding, much improved over my MKIV.


I am NOT talking about focus but refresh rate on the EVF - keeping the subject centered in the VF - because if you don't keep it in the VF it does'nt matter where the focus is !

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 21:06:10   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
imagemeister wrote:
I am NOT talking about focus but refresh rate on the EVF - keeping the subject centered in the VF - because if you don't keep it in the VF it does'nt matter where the focus is !


There is NO issue keeping the subject more or less centered.
It is far more the ability of the user to keep the subject where they want in a frame from shooting cars moving at high speed and aircraft.
Both move exponentially faster than a bird.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.