Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Image stabilization & long exposures
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Sep 11, 2023 11:02:13   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Basil_O wrote:
So check your facts. Minolta introduced AF in 1985. Honeywell had developed the process in the 70's.


And Minolta has how large of a market share in 2023? Honeywell?

As a reminder to all the owners of also-rans and never-weres: out of every 10 cameras sold worldwide in 2022, 5 of them are Canon EOS models. Just like it's been for 20+ years, going back to the mid 1990s.

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 11:02:50   #
Basil_O Loc: Minneapolis, MN
 
TheShoe wrote:
Check your reading, the comment was about IBIS, not ILIS.


Nope. Reading is fine. The first part if the comment was about AF and the EOS system.

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 11:04:46   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
rehess wrote:
Market leading technology??????
Now you Canon guys are as bad as the Nikon guys. Believe it or not, the world of cameras existed before MILCs.
The used Pentax K-30 I purchased in 2015 had IBIS - exactly when did Canon ‘discover’ IBIS??


I had 5.5 stops of Image Stabilization back in 2011. Canon and Nikon may be working IBIS now, but they were not back then.

Reply
 
 
Sep 11, 2023 11:05:49   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
tommymac wrote:
I am shooting some long exposure waterfalls this week and wondering whether I should turn off IS on my canon RF lens (using r6). Thanks.


It turns itself off.

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 11:06:09   #
Basil_O Loc: Minneapolis, MN
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
And Minolta has how large of a market share in 2023? Honeywell?

As a reminder, out of every 10 cameras sold worldwide in 2022, 5 of them are Canon EOS models. Just like it's been for 20+ years, going back to the mid 1990s.


Not arguing with that. Actually, Sony is the successor to the Minolta legacy after buying the camera portion of the company and jump starting their entry into the digital photography market.

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 11:14:46   #
tommymac Loc: Green Bay, Wisconsin
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Come on. This is 21st century, market-leading EOS technology. It's been well over a decade of market leadership from Canon in the area of Image Stabilization. This leading Canon IS technology includes the 'smarts' to sense a stable tripod platform and not cause any problem. You're more likely to forget to turn IS back on than it will impact your long-exposure images. Passing around outdated suggestions and non-Canon best practices is what makes the internet such a cesspool.


Thanks Paul. I’ll heed your advice.

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 11:29:18   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
As a reminder to all the owners of also-rans and never-weres: out of every 10 cameras sold worldwide in 2022, 5 of them are Canon EOS models. Just like it's been for 20+ years, going back to the mid 1990s.

Yes, Canon marketing is fine.

Even I had three spread over twenty years, the film EOS was OK, but then I was let down by two digital cameras in a row. In each case, the camera showed signs of processor problems, then completely failed.

Reply
 
 
Sep 11, 2023 11:55:03   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
tommymac wrote:
I am shooting some long exposure waterfalls this week and wondering whether I should turn off IS on my canon RF lens (using r6). Thanks.


I suggest that you read your manuals carefully, then do some experimentation to see how your camera and lenses function. On my newest cameras, IS gradually fades away starting after about 5 seconds and is gone completely after 10 or 15 seconds.

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 11:58:26   #
gunflint Loc: Rocky Mountain High, Colorado
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Come on. This is 21st century, market-leading EOS technology. It's been well over a decade of market leadership from Canon in the area of Image Stabilization. This leading Canon IS technology includes the 'smarts' to sense a stable tripod platform and not cause any problem. You're more likely to forget to turn IS back on than it will impact your long-exposure images. Passing around outdated suggestions and non-Canon best practices is what makes the internet such a cesspool.


I agree, and I always forget to turn it off anyway...

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 12:24:55   #
SnappyHappy Loc: Chapin, SC “The Capitol of Lake Murray”
 
tommymac wrote:
I am shooting some long exposure waterfalls this week and wondering whether I should turn off IS on my canon RF lens (using r6). Thanks.


I also disable IS when on my tripod. The N/D filter suggestion is always worthwhile when shooting waterfalls. I might suggest that you also make a series of bursts without the N/D filter. You can blend them in post to achieve a similar blur effect on the moving parts of your scene. This can be an effective work around for an occasion that you are without a tripod.

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 12:36:04   #
rcarol
 
wdross wrote:
I had 5.5 stops of Image Stabilization back in 2011. Canon and Nikon may be working IBIS now, but they were not back then.


Back in the day of emerging IS, Canon came to the conclusion that optical stabilization was more effective in longer focal length lenses than was IBIS. Furthermore, they had concluded that longer focal lenses benefited from IS than wide lenses. So, optical image stabilization is where they put their money.

Reply
 
 
Sep 11, 2023 12:40:52   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
rcarol wrote:
Back in the day of emerging IS, Canon came to the conclusion that optical stabilization was more effective in longer focal length lenses than was IBIS. Furthermore, they had concluded that longer focal lenses benefited from IS than wide lenses. So, optical image stabilization is where they put their money.

For film yes.
Apparently the R7 has IBIS - maybe they’re trying both ways now {they apparently have money to throw at issues}.

Canon wrote:
EOS R7 Body
SKU
5137C002
$1,499.00
(18)
In Stock
High Image Quality with a 32.5 Megapixel (APS-C) CMOS Sensor
High-Speed Shooting
Blazing Fast Autofocus
5-axis In-body Image Stabilization with auto-level technology

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 12:47:29   #
rcarol
 
Not just for film. Canon adhered to their policy of optical stabilization for most of the DSLRs as well.

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 13:19:09   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
Basil_O wrote:
So check your facts. Minolta introduced AF in 1985. Honeywell had developed the process in the 70's.


Nope, read carefully (and check YOUR facts) I didn’t say Canon was the FIRST camera with AF, which was the Konica C35 in 1977 (not Minolta). I SAID “Canon popularized AF”.

Reply
Sep 11, 2023 13:20:09   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
rcarol wrote:
Back in the day of emerging IS, Canon came to the conclusion that optical stabilization was more effective in longer focal length lenses than was IBIS. Furthermore, they had concluded that longer focal lenses benefited from IS than wide lenses. So, optical image stabilization is where they put their money.


Exactly.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.