Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
monochrome versus color conversion to B&W
Page <<first <prev 4 of 11 next> last>>
Aug 24, 2023 13:50:23   #
Ysarex Loc: St. Louis
 
selmslie wrote:
You keep repeating that mantra.

Because it's correct. Your attempt to discredit that mantra is just dumb.
selmslie wrote:
But I can find only one B&W image from you where you did a B&W conversion. https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-649304-1.html

The height of stupid to think you can assess my involvement in b&w photography from some posts on an internet forum.

Reply
Aug 24, 2023 14:50:18   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
Ysarex wrote:
The height of stupid to think you can assess my involvement in b&w photography from some posts on an internet forum.

It's pretty easy to assess your involvement in B&W photography. It's minimal and superficial.

You have never displayed evidence of an interest in B&W photograph on this site or any other. I can find only two B&W digital images here from you. If you could walk the walk you would be posting B&W images you are proud of. You show little or no interest in producing quality B&W images.

I am involved in both color and B&W photography. Click on one of the links under my signature line. You will find plenty of examples of the kind of photography that interests me - color and B&W, digital and film from small to large format. I have posted some of those on this forum. I am comfortable with B&W and have been for decades.

You main interest is in arguing about the mechanics of photography. You are a photo-mechanic, not a creative photographer.

Reply
Aug 24, 2023 15:30:37   #
Ysarex Loc: St. Louis
 
selmslie wrote:
It's pretty easy to assess your involvement in B&W photography. It's minimal and superficial.

You have never displayed evidence of an interest in B&W photograph on this site or any other. I can find only two B&W digital images here from you. If you could walk the walk you would be posting B&W images you are proud of. You show little or no interest in producing quality B&W images.

That is completely ignorant. You have barely an inkling of my background and involvement in photography. To think you can tell that from some posts on a web forum is stupid.

Reply
 
 
Aug 24, 2023 15:32:00   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
Ysarex wrote:
That is completely ignorant. You have barely have an inkling of my background and involvement in photography. To think you can tell that from some posts on a web forum is stupid.

Prove me wrong.

Reply
Aug 24, 2023 15:33:01   #
Ysarex Loc: St. Louis
 
selmslie wrote:
Prove me wrong.

No need to prove that stupid is stupid -- you're self documenting.

Reply
Aug 24, 2023 15:35:32   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
Ysarex wrote:
No need to prove that stupid is stupid.

That's a childish retort. The truth hurts, doesn't it.

Reply
Aug 24, 2023 15:43:47   #
User ID
 
Retired CPO wrote:
Oh, wow. It's so sad to see you back!

There you are, yesterdays news on the hoof.

Reply
 
 
Aug 24, 2023 15:46:48   #
User ID
 
Canisdirus wrote:
No...just a habit. I don't think about dslr's much.

But if you were looking for a middle ground...I'd suggest a DSLR for B&W.

The Pentax K3M3 Monochrome dslr.

If you can't do Leica...that's a good option that is affrodable.

Assuming it has live view, you could even put it on a tripod and play at being youknowwho.

YKW
YKW...
(Download)

Reply
Aug 24, 2023 16:02:15   #
Canisdirus
 
selmslie wrote:
What is obvious is that you have no hands-on experience with a monochrome sensor.

It's not necessary to tweak the colors during a B&W conversion unless you are trying to produce a particular effect. If you don't want to do that then a monochrome sensor will do a better job.

You can't make an informed assessment of the tradeoffs involved based on clueless speculation and Google searches.


Yes...that is what post processing is for...to achieve desired images.

You can PP a color image till the cows come home...you can't if you take the shot in B&W...not nearly as much.

Sharpness is hardly even an issue anymore...and the resolution...well...you would have to tell everyone...they wouldn't see it on their own.

Reply
Aug 24, 2023 16:09:21   #
andesbill
 
Ysarex wrote:
That's just dumb. Being able to control the color conversion to greyscale has always been an important component of b&w photography and we did the best we could with filters back in the film era. Being able to discretely control that process now in post is a big advantage when creating b&w conversions from color originals. It's not just for effect.

It permits us to separate colors that would convert to similar grey tones into less similar grey tones. In my neighborhood being able to do that with reds and greens is essential (see below). It's an important enough feature that I wouldn't give it up for an increase in sharpness especially since my images with a CFA are already sharp enough.
That's just dumb. Being able to control the color ... (show quote)


I prefer the look using the monochrome sensor, but you definitely lose information with it. Red and green have the same values, and the red stripe is washed out.

Reply
Aug 24, 2023 16:58:00   #
hoosier500
 
Agreed. The negatives should be left to those still using analog film.

Reply
 
 
Aug 24, 2023 17:21:47   #
Ysarex Loc: St. Louis
 
andesbill wrote:
I prefer the look using the monochrome sensor, but you definitely lose information with it. Red and green have the same values, and the red stripe is washed out.

It wasn't really a monochrome sensor -- that's why I put monochrome in parenthesis. It was the color image desaturated without any adjustments to control the color conversion to grayscale; what you could expect from a monochrome sensor. And yes, the point is that the red and green that are very different seen in color become the same greyscale tone when converted if you don't control that color conversion.

Reply
Aug 24, 2023 18:10:24   #
delder Loc: Maryland
 
Tri-X was my original B/W sensor.

Reply
Aug 24, 2023 22:20:23   #
jburlinson Loc: Austin, TX
 
User ID wrote:
It was somewhat interesting in the last several exact same discussions this year ... but its not interesting anymore. Its just yesterdays news.


If the op is interested in checking out a recent thread on the topic, please see:

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-782163-1.html

This doesn't supercede the current thread, it just adds some additional info.

Reply
Aug 25, 2023 06:40:53   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Ditto: "I will continue to prefer creating B&W images from color raw files."
dkeysser wrote:
I am thinking about having one of my digital cameras coverted to monochrome. Before I do that, (1) does anyone have experience having that done and any warning cautions; and (b) has anyone experimented with the difference in image quality between a color image converted into B&W (Lightroom or PhotoShop) and an image originally shot in monochrome? Is it really worth it to convert to pure monochrome? I am willing to do it if there is a discernbile different in resolution, sharpness and overall image quality. thanks.
I am thinking about having one of my digital camer... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.