Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Disclosure of editing when posting pictures
Page <<first <prev 6 of 16 next> last>>
Aug 12, 2023 08:14:38   #
HRPufnstuf
 
Architect1776 wrote:
When you add a fake image you must disclose it.
Otherwise you are lying to the world that it is a photo you captured at the lake.
Some take umbrage at calling it lying but it is. Might as well have AI add a fake sky, or better yet do the whole thing for you.


When I take portraits, in post processing I may soften skin, remove zits, whiten teeth, narrow faces, widen eyes. Never once has anyone accused me of lying.

Reply
Aug 12, 2023 08:23:31   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
HRPufnstuf wrote:
When I take portraits, in post processing I may soften skin, remove zits, whiten teeth, narrow faces, widen eyes. Never once has anyone accused me of lying.


Reply
Aug 12, 2023 08:24:14   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
damianlv wrote:
My question is: when posting my images on social media should I disclose that the image was modified?
Recently in a late afternoon I went to Davis pond near Reno, NV to take pictures of the pond when the sunlight is at low angle. My intention was to add some sunset clouds. I edited one of the pictures in PS, just added some sunset clouds and adjusted tint of the trees to match the sunset feel.
I posted the final picture on FB in some local groups without mentioning that the photo was edited. People love this picture and couple of them responded that they come to that place all the time but never saw it from this angle and with clouds like that.
What is the right approach? Disclosure that I edited the image, or just don't say anything?
My question is: when posting my images on social m... (show quote)


When I heavily edit an image I usually mention that I have done so. I guess it is a personal preference, I see a lot of images online especially in Facebook groups that have been expertly processed with little or no mention of what they have done... I guess it is up to you.

Reply
 
 
Aug 12, 2023 08:43:10   #
piperplt
 
Basil wrote:
Unless we’re talking photojournalism I assume every nice image I see has been processed in some way. Is it a big deal that Ansel Adams modified his images in the darkroom using dodging and burning? No. He used the tools available to him to modify the original exposure and create art.

The only difference I see is that today we have better tools.


I agree 100%. I also believe every published image I see has been modified to some extent from gentle tweaking to sky replacement, etc. I take images for my own enjoyment and not for publication so I have no problem modifying them for my own satisfaction.

Reply
Aug 12, 2023 08:48:24   #
sodapop Loc: Bel Air, MD
 
Curmudgeon wrote:
I shoot in RAW and therefore have to process my photographs, What I do or don't do is nobodies business but mine. When I use AI or someone else's photograph in my composites I acknowledge that.


You are absolutely correct! Even the camera modifies a jpg. You don't ask a painter to disclose what paints they use and it is no one's business

Reply
Aug 12, 2023 08:55:21   #
Jeffcs Loc: Myrtle Beach South Carolina
 
I WILL NOT use any thing including clouds that I didn’t shoot
I may very well be wrong here but I feel all of my images MUST be mine from my camera
I don’t feel that I need to disclose PP I would suspect 99.99999% of images had some sort of digital manipulation
Look at Ansel Adams all of his prints are manipulated
so now we’re in the digital age of photography
What I don’t particularly like are images with heavy “AI” where the image would have been impossible to capture as presented, moving buildings,mountains stuff like that

Reply
Aug 12, 2023 09:11:50   #
Canisdirus
 
No need to say anything...

Photography is an art form...

Anything goes.

Reply
 
 
Aug 12, 2023 09:16:50   #
StanMac Loc: Tennessee
 
damianlv wrote:
My question is: when posting my images on social media should I disclose that the image was modified?
Recently in a late afternoon I went to Davis pond near Reno, NV to take pictures of the pond when the sunlight is at low angle. My intention was to add some sunset clouds. I edited one of the pictures in PS, just added some sunset clouds and adjusted tint of the trees to match the sunset feel.
I posted the final picture on FB in some local groups without mentioning that the photo was edited. People love this picture and couple of them responded that they come to that place all the time but never saw it from this angle and with clouds like that.
What is the right approach? Disclosure that I edited the image, or just don't say anything?
My question is: when posting my images on social m... (show quote)


You did an excellent job emulating the illumination of the setting sun. To answer your question, is it expected of a painter to explain or justify their use of particular color choices in depicting a subject?

Stan

Reply
Aug 12, 2023 09:17:21   #
Bubbee Loc: Aventura, Florida
 
I think it depends on who your viewers are, and the purpose of the image. Here on UGG, I and many others, appreciate knowing the settings and techniques used.
Number 1 is beautiful !

Reply
Aug 12, 2023 09:31:34   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
Jeffcs wrote:
I WILL NOT use any thing including clouds that I didn’t shoot
I may very well be wrong here but I feel all of my images MUST be mine from my camera...

That is a personal decision. I don't feel that way but that's just me. I can not and will not dispute your decision for you.
Jeffcs wrote:
...I don’t feel that I need to disclose PP I would suspect 99.99999% of images had some sort of digital manipulation
Look at Ansel Adams all of his prints are manipulated...

The camera does some based on the settings you supply, so that's probably 100% (even if you don't change the default settings).
Jeffcs wrote:
so now we’re in the digital age of photography
What I don’t particularly like are images with heavy “AI” where the image would have been impossible to capture as presented, moving buildings,mountains stuff like that

IMHO, there is art and there is documentation. They are completely different things and subject to different 'rules'.

Reply
Aug 12, 2023 09:32:30   #
wapiti Loc: round rock, texas
 
Longshadow wrote:
It's a photo they created, not necessarily "took".
Why is it always assumed that that's what the camera saw?
Should it be announced that a photo was edited to enhance a particular look also???



Reply
 
 
Aug 12, 2023 09:47:19   #
Peterfiore Loc: Where DR goes south
 
Longshadow wrote:
For some it is!


Religion has at times, been labeled as a cult. Cult attitude is a problem. Never works.

Reply
Aug 12, 2023 09:58:21   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Peterfiore wrote:
Religion has at times, been labeled as a cult. Cult attitude is a problem. Never works.


Reply
Aug 12, 2023 10:02:30   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
It doesn’t matter how you got to your destination - driving a stick shift or an automatic - just so you get there. There’s no such thing as an unedited photo since cameras do so much editing internally. SOOC is as close as you can get.

Reply
Aug 12, 2023 10:04:35   #
sippyjug104 Loc: Missouri
 
Does a woman disclose when she applies makeup to enhance how she looks? Does her applying makeup provide her with a good feeling? Does a person that cheats on their tax form disclose that they did so?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 16 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.