Bill female sports began in earnest 50 years ago with the implementation of Title IX...

Title IX is a Federal civil rights law that was passed in 1972 as part of the Education Amendments of that year. Its main aim is to prevent sex-based discrimination in education programs and activities that receive federal funding, such as higher education institutions, local school districts, museum programs, and libraries. These institutions must provide equal treatment across all areas of work, to both students and employees. Otherwise, they risk losing federal funding for not complying with federal law.

More over the implementation of Title IX led to strong institutional change. Women in sports, at both the elementary and higher education levels, benefited from greater access to team sports and resources. Prior to Title IX, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) did not host athletic championships for female teams. Women also failed to receive athletic scholarships for colleges and universities. Team doctors, insurance, and equal access to athletic facilities were lacking for collegiate women’s sports teams. However, Title IX ensured larger amounts of funding were destined for such activities, which not only ensured more safety and support for female athletes, but also increased female participation in sports. The Women’s Sports Foundation estimates that, as of 2016, there was a “545% increase of women playing college sports and a 990% increase of women playing high school sports” thanks to Title IX.

Enter the dragon! On July 21, 2014, President Obama signed Executive Order 13672, adding "gender identity" to the categories protected against discrimination in hiring in the federal civilian workforce and both "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" to the categories protected against discrimination in hiring and employment.
This is the Executive Order (13672) which opened the door to allow transgender "women" into Women's Sports. Money changes everything! Failure to comply? Lose your Federal Funding, thus no organization has had the courage to challenge the madness of allowing fully developed males to compete against females. While there has been a concerted effort to dance around this by using hormone levels as a diagnostic this in it's self if ludicrous since any male who has passed through puberty will have benefited from a massive increase in not only muscle mass but also circulating hemoglobin (think aerobic endurance here).

Bill sadly we stand on the threshold of the largest paradox of possibly this century... There are no good or equable solutions. Personally I'm gender neutral on this topic since I see no clear way forward, however I'm adamant and unwavering that no fully intact male should be allowed in the same dressing room where young female adults have to disrobe to change into their team uniforms.

I work with many many young women as a makeup artist and photographer both on location and studio assignments. These young ladies hope to work as "Agency Represented" fashion and beauty models. And I refuse to collaborate with them unless they are accompanied by a parent or responsible adult (no exceptions) experience is a brutal teacher. Young girls are so easily traumatize by being exposed naked to males. This in a "bridge too far" I will defend the sanctity of young women's right to privacy regardless of any and all Amendments to Title IX.

Let's hope that calm minds and objective wisdom prevails here...