Wonderful work, Doc! Thanks for sharing.
UTMike wrote:
Wonderful work, Doc! Thanks for sharing.
No Mike, thank you so much for taking the time to look in and commenting!
>i< Doc
Beautiful set Doc. About how long are they, in inches please I never mastered metric
Curmudgeon wrote:
Beautiful set Doc. About how long are they, in inches please I never mastered metric
Thanks so much Jack. They are 1.46- to 1.65-inches other dancers are 1.2- to 1.5 inches. Now while that doesn't seem like a great difference (which it's not) when you see one they seem larger than most.
>i< Doc
Thanks for looking in Brian. I'm glad you enjoyed them.
>i< Doc
Great set, Doc. That last one is really outstanding.
kpmac wrote:
Great set, Doc. That last one is really outstanding.
I appreciate the fine comment Ken. I guess she was too busy eating to notice me taking her portrait. You’ve had some terrible weather down in that area this spring. I hope you are alright.
>i< Doc
Umnak
Loc: Mount Vernon, Wa.
Beautiful shooting Doc!! I'm glad I had time to look through the gallery today!!
Rob
Umnak wrote:
Beautiful shooting Doc!! I'm glad I had time to look through the gallery today!!
Rob
I really appreciate that Rob. They did turn out pretty good. I’m not really a photographer. I don’t do artsy. I shoot to get field markings for exact identification. Thanks for taking the time to look in and comment.
>i< Doc
Umnak
Loc: Mount Vernon, Wa.
docshark wrote:
I really appreciate that Rob. They did turn out pretty good. I’m not really a photographer. I don’t do artsy. I shoot to get field markings for exact identification. Thanks for taking the time to look in and comment.
>i< Doc
I get that Tony and what I always like about your posts, is that they are scientifically sound/helpful but also usually follow the guidelines of good photography!
Rob
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.