Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What do you wish photographers would QUIT WHINING ABOUT?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 13 next> last>>
Apr 1, 2023 09:20:30   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
Architect1776 wrote:
I believe most EVERYONE is living on a fixed income.
Unless you are self employed and choose how much you want to work.
I believe most EVERYONE is living on a fixed incom... (show quote)


'Fixed' seems to mean 'effectively decreasing by 4-8%/year' these days.

Reply
Apr 1, 2023 09:22:59   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
Longshadow wrote:
Yup.
When I was working, it was a "fixed" amount every two weeks.....


Just walk in to the boss and say "I need an extra $500 this week to cover expenses and a new camera." and see how far that goes. Then say "Next week I will let you know what I need".

Reply
Apr 1, 2023 09:25:30   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Architect1776 wrote:
Just walk in to the boss and say "I need an extra $500 this week to cover expenses and a new camera." and see how far that goes. Then say "Next week I will let you know what I need".

And when he stops laughing.......

Reply
 
 
Apr 1, 2023 09:36:07   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
'Fixed' seems to mean 'effectively decreasing by 4-8%/year' these days.


True,
My father bought a nice ranch in AZ for $8,000 with a house and built a new house all on a teacher's salary.
When he go too old to run it he sold it for 3.5 million. How many starting out teachers on a one income family and no assets could do this today?

Reply
Apr 1, 2023 09:45:23   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
burkphoto wrote:
I'll start:

> The cost of subscription software — Either subscribe or buy a stand-alone license for something else.

> The fact that subscription software is a thing — Developers have to eat, too.

> The cost of decent lab prints — If you ever worked in a lab, you would know why good prints cost good money — especially in today's low volume environment!

> The cost of ink and inkjet papers for dedicated photo inkjet printers — Do you want the best? Yes? Then hush. It's five times the price of silver halide, and worth it.

> The cost of film for film photography — Run the prices through an inflation calculator. You'll be shocked at what a bargain it is — IF you still use film. I know I paid more than $3.26 a roll for the same film in 1980 that costs $12.00 a roll today. But I'll take a $12.00 64GB SDXC card over a roll of film, today.

> Raw vs. JPEG — They both have their uses as workflows. Life is full of trade-offs. Pick yours today!
I'll start: br br > The cost of subscription s... (show quote)


Not knowing what to buy or what to keep or what to sell or what to take.

Reply
Apr 1, 2023 09:48:21   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
Longshadow wrote:


But there are so many people who think (believe) that everyone should be utilizing a particular method,
and they'll justify out the wazoo why.
Similar with cameras.....

One possible reason is they lack the self confidence to do it their own way. The need that validation from others that they are doing the right thing. So if you do something different it threatens their value system.

Reply
Apr 1, 2023 09:49:19   #
Scruples Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
TucsonDave wrote:
Abe's of Maine.


NOT AGAIN!!’

Reply
 
 
Apr 1, 2023 09:56:06   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
JD750 wrote:
One possible reason is they lack the self confidence to do it their own way. The need that validation from others that they are doing the right thing. So if you do something different it threatens their value system.


Reply
Apr 1, 2023 09:59:50   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
JD750 wrote:
#2 Electronic aperture control and no external aperture ring on the lens.


That is not usually an issue for still photography.

People who started with real movie film and now use video have a habit to do "fade to black" or "fade to white" with an aperture change instead of with post production software. They don't do (or cannot do, due to camera constraints) run-and-gun aperture adjustments with auto exposure, either. So there are still ciné lenses and a few Leica Micro 4/3 lenses that have "step-less" aperture control (no detents) for these purposes. Chances are, if you've earned the chops to do work that requires that, you can afford the right stuff. Or your production company can afford to rent it...

Reply
Apr 1, 2023 10:03:53   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
burkphoto wrote:
That is not usually an issue for still photography.

People who started with real movie film and now use video have a habit to do "fade to black" or "fade to white" with an aperture change instead of with post production software. They don't do (or cannot do, due to camera constraints) run-and-gun aperture adjustments with auto exposure, either. So there are still ciné lenses and a few Leica Micro 4/3 lenses that have "step-less" aperture control (no detents) for these purposes. Chances are, if you've earned the chops to do work that requires that, you can afford the right stuff. Or your production company can afford to rent it...
That is not usually an issue for still photography... (show quote)



Reply
Apr 1, 2023 10:06:11   #
Canisdirus
 
Whining itself wins...it's a thing now...everywhere.

The baby boomers adopted it...the WW2 crowd tolerated it...and now it is taught as a way of life...in schools.

Everything is a complaint now.

Statistically...everyone in the US is walking around with two hams under each arm complaining about no bread.

Reply
 
 
Apr 1, 2023 10:12:09   #
ELNikkor
 
Got my coffee and apple pie, UHH forum, D750 nearby; nothing to whine about, but considering wining when my wife comes home tonight...

Reply
Apr 1, 2023 10:16:15   #
Jerrin1 Loc: Wolverhampton, England
 
The fact that Olympus is now OMS. The whingers are still moaning about the change and whining that the OM1 is too expensive, the OM5 doesn't actually have all the features of the OM1 at a reduced cost, the 90mm f3.5 macro IS isn't a 100mm f2.8 - oh and it is too expensive. No one, I repeat, no one is forced to purchase OMS products: so if you don't like them, change to Nikon, Canon, Sony or Panasonic, just stop whinging and whining. No one ever said M43 has to be cheap, or weigh the same as a helium filled ballon.

Reply
Apr 1, 2023 10:16:19   #
Doyle Thomas Loc: Vancouver Washington ~ USA
 
the removal of built in strobes

Reply
Apr 1, 2023 10:23:30   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
burkphoto wrote:
I'll start:

> The cost of subscription software — Either subscribe or buy a stand-alone license for something else.

> The fact that subscription software is a thing — Developers have to eat, too.

> The cost of decent lab prints — If you ever worked in a lab, you would know why good prints cost good money — especially in today's low volume environment!

> The cost of ink and inkjet papers for dedicated photo inkjet printers — Do you want the best? Yes? Then hush. It's five times the price of silver halide, and worth it.

> The cost of film for film photography — Run the prices through an inflation calculator. You'll be shocked at what a bargain it is — IF you still use film. I know I paid more than $3.26 a roll for the same film in 1980 that costs $12.00 a roll today. But I'll take a $12.00 64GB SDXC card over a roll of film, today.

> Raw vs. JPEG — They both have their uses as workflows. Life is full of trade-offs. Pick yours today!
I'll start: br br > The cost of subscription s... (show quote)


Remember It Is April 1!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.