Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Film
Page <<first <prev 4 of 10 next> last>>
Mar 5, 2023 11:34:46   #
sgt hop Loc: baltimore md,now in salisbury md
 
this thing is starting to sound like the attic....banning film????does film hurt someone that much that it should be banned????? i dunnno...film never bothered me, and i used quite a bit of it....spent a lot of times in my darkrooms and never became ill....when it became time for me to give up my darkroom, couldn't afford the supplies anymore, and took up digital, i donated my darkroom to a baltimore high school....a friend was a teacher and he wanted to give photo lessons to the kids that were interested.....i'm 87 now and had played with photography from about 13 on....never made a nickle outta it, but really enjoyed it...i have a bunch of cameras i have collected over the years that i'm gonna have to unload....none of my kids have any interest in photography...anyway, i don't wanna ban film....

Reply
Mar 5, 2023 11:40:07   #
jack schade Loc: La Pine Oregon
 
I also spent many years shooting film. I don't think I will ever go back to it. I do still have my Canon F1 with 3 lenses.

jack

Reply
Mar 5, 2023 11:40:28   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
brentrh wrote:
Is film coming back? Spent 20 years as a film photographer switched to digital 10 years ago never went back to film. No advantage to film


I would have to say, the comment, no advantage to film, depends on who you are and your wants in the world of photography. I enjoy taking film photographs with older cameras. Maybe your comment should be, I see no advantage to film.

Dennis

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2023 12:05:27   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
burkphoto wrote:
Film has a strong following among photography teachers, professors, artists, hippie throwbacks, serious hobbyists, and young people who are amazed to watch a B&W print "come up" in the developer tray.

Now, I am NOT knocking film. I used it from 1960 to 2005, and spent 20 years in a photo lab that processed tens of thousands of miles of it. That was before I helped to guide that company's transition to 100% digital processes. Retired, I spend a lot of time now, digitizing film negatives and slides.

It is amazing to see how many film stocks are still available, although the variety is dwindling. Old film cameras are cheap, while the NEW 2022 Leica M6 body alone costs $5295 or so. You HAVE to love film or have burnable cash to buy that... and add lenses!

MIT's Dr. Nicholas Negroponte is fond of saying, "Bits beat atoms." What he means is that the virtual world has more advantages than the physical world when it comes to image making. In the school portrait business, we recognized that back in the early 1990s as Kodak shared their development efforts with us. Once the market matured enough for practical production, we dove in fully.

Unfortunately for us, however, the market went sideways …………..

Film served its purpose for me for decades. Digital has met my needs since 2005, including that of preserving my film images and sharing them broadly. It enables me to do things with film I exposed 50 years ago that I could not do 50 years ago. So while I no longer expose film, I still make use of film images.
Film has a strong following among photography teac... (show quote)

The primary purpose of school and other ‘group’ pictures always seemed to me to be a means of ‘pro’ photographers to reach markets they would otherwise never reach. Digital allows them to get to the customer faster - allowing the salesman to touch the customer immediately after the picture is taken.

Reply
Mar 5, 2023 13:01:21   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
rehess wrote:
The primary purpose of school and other ‘group’ pictures always seemed to me to be a means of ‘pro’ photographers to reach markets they would otherwise never reach. Digital allows them to get to the customer faster - allowing the salesman to touch the customer immediately after the picture is taken.


Digressionary rant:

Head and shoulders school portraits and group portraits served multiple purposes. The photographer, lab, and school were in a symbiotic sort of relationship:

> The lab needed film to process and print.

> The photographer needed access to parents to sell portraits.

> The school needed all sorts of "service" items (ID cards, rotary file card prints or digital images for a student information system, sticker prints for teachers' file folders, portrait prints or digital images for the yearbook, team pictures for the football program and yearbook...

> Then there was the school fundraising aspect. Usually, a portion of the price of a school portrait package (i.e.; a commission on the sale) went to the school to pay for extras that were not included in the school budget, such as funding PTA or PTSA projects, buying new books for the library, painting lines in the parking lot, or paying for teachers' supplies.

The school portrait market dates back 100 years or more. Eventually, by the post-WWII years, large companies evolved to serve nearly all the schools in the Western world.

I worked for three of those. The first of them had about $20 million in photo finishing sales annually in 1979 when I joined. We bought mile-long rolls of 40-inch paper that lined the halls in early Fall. We mixed chemicals in 1100-gallon drums. We built our own printing machines that cost about $120,000 each in the late 1970s. Cameras used 100' rolls of 35mm, 46mm, or 70mm wide, unperforated film. Ciné type film processors ran C41 continuously, six days a week in the Fall.

We had 100 independent dealers across the USA and Puerto Rico, and at one point, at least one dealer in every state.

After 50 years in business, in 1996, Delmar was purchased by a school market conglomerate, Herff Jones. Their Photography Division had a different but similar business model that included some 60 retail territories of photographers and some 1000 independent local studios who were all a lot smaller than the dealer operations we had. Some of those folks did a little school portrait work, but that volume was tiny compared to the dealers we brought to the table. The good news was that we were an ESOP.

Ultimately, our division was sold to Lifetouch 15 years later. We ex-HJ employees transitioned our ESOP shares three years later (Whew!).

LT struggled, and was sold to Shutterfly in 2018. They've been laying off people left and right, since, as the market shrinks. Once a proud ESOP, Lifetouch is no longer employee-owned. Employees got hosed in the merger as the stock price sank when senior managers sold their shares.

Such is the sad tale of woe in the school portrait business. Bits beat atoms, folks!

Reply
Mar 5, 2023 13:07:35   #
stanikon Loc: Deep in the Heart of Texas
 
BebuLamar wrote:
Why do you ask? It seems either it comes back or not would not affect you in anyway.


Don't you ever get curious about something just for the sake of being curious about it? I'm curious about many things that do not, will not ever and have never affected me in any way.

Reply
Mar 5, 2023 13:09:26   #
stanikon Loc: Deep in the Heart of Texas
 
User ID wrote:
Film should be banned.

Hopefully, thaz about to happen.


Why?

Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2023 13:09:32   #
BebuLamar
 
stanikon wrote:
Don't you ever get curious about something just for the sake of being curious about it? I'm curious about many things that do not, will not ever and have never affected me in any way.


Thanks for responding. But the OP didn't care to just to say so. I feel the OP has the reason beyond curious.

Reply
Mar 5, 2023 13:18:20   #
stanikon Loc: Deep in the Heart of Texas
 
BebuLamar wrote:
Thanks for responding. But the OP didn't care to just to say so. I feel the OP has the reason beyond curious.


But your response seems to indicate that he/she should not be asking if it has no affect on him/her. You may feel that the OP has an unstated motive but it's exactly that: your own feeling. You are interpreting something that isn't stated.

Reply
Mar 5, 2023 13:27:10   #
tybeejim Loc: Tybee Island, GA
 
I think it’s just somewhat of a “thing” to be different. I once owned a Leica M6 when it was new and digital didn’t exist, ca 1998. Loved that camera and would like to have it back. Kind of like you wish you could get a Porsche GT3 with a manual transmission. But my first real digital camera, a Canon 5D Mk II still produces great photos for my hobby. I added a Sony A7C with a bunch of G Master lenses that is still less expensive than a new M6 body! There will always be a niche for film for those who enjoy it. But it’s day has past. Digital is for now and the near future until quantum computing comes up with something else.

Reply
Mar 5, 2023 13:35:12   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
stanikon wrote:
Don't you ever get curious about something just for the sake of being curious about it? I'm curious about many things that do not, will not ever and have never affected me in any way.


Reply
 
 
Mar 5, 2023 13:42:06   #
tybeejim Loc: Tybee Island, GA
 
If one has never used film (and I’m sure there are many) then curiosity might entertain them but at some expense. It’s not that there is no value to the old media, but today's requirement for speed brought on by the nature of social media, not art, makes film obsolete.

Reply
Mar 5, 2023 14:04:39   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
tybeejim wrote:
If one has never used film (and I’m sure there are many) then curiosity might entertain them but at some expense. It’s not that there is no value to the old media, but today's requirement for speed brought on by the nature of social media, not art, makes film obsolete.

Yup.

Reply
Mar 5, 2023 14:08:11   #
BebuLamar
 
stanikon wrote:
But your response seems to indicate that he/she should not be asking if it has no affect on him/her. You may feel that the OP has an unstated motive but it's exactly that: your own feeling. You are interpreting something that isn't stated.


That is why I asked. Is he just curious or some other reasons he asked? It seems I have no right to ask.

Reply
Mar 5, 2023 14:09:51   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
BebuLamar wrote:
That is why I asked. Is he just curious or some other reasons he asked? It seems I have no right to ask.


Rules are for the other members.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.