User ID wrote:
You have made it exceedingly clear that who does or does not manufacture their own optical blanks, or internal lens parts, is no predictor of anything at all, not the IQ or reliability. Just read your own post, tedious though that may be.
Exactly correct User ID, not making the blanks of the bare glass or some parts doesn't mean ANYTHING. These companies like Sigma, Tamron, Sony, Panasonic, Fuji, Olympus, Canon, etc. DO source top quality bare glass, and then mold, press, grind, polish and coat them to their exact design specs and fully assemble them in their own plants with many parts they manufacture in-house, and that is what matters, the final product.
Nothing about Nikon making their own blanks makes their lenses superior to the best lenses from any other lens makers, nothing.
What product today from the most expensive cars, electronics, appliances, even airplanes ,etc. with hundreds and even thousands of parts is TOTALLY made from scratch with all in-house made and/or sourced parts , probably none.
Nikon cameras are not totally made with in-house built parts, the sensors are made by Sony BTW. And I bet there are some electronics and other parts inside Nikon cameras that may have been designed by Nikon, but aren't made by Nikon.
You are free to have your own personal preferences and biases, we all do, but dont try to sell anyone else on your fake facts about Sigma only using lowest bid glass blanks, and lowest bid lens parts . LOL
No one is buying it Bill, sorry. And yes you can "keep this up all day". but you are just making yourself look very juvenile, sad.
Cheers and best to you.