jerryc41 wrote:
If the amount had been small, it wouldn't have meant anything to the town. When you figure what the guy went through just doing his job, the $350,000 from the jury and the $150,000 added by the town definitely made an impression on the town. When you think that the driver was walking from the store to his truck with an invoice and muffins, why would the police have stopped him, except that they could? "Hey, let's have some fun with this guy." Police have a badge and a gun, and they're allowed to lie. In addition, they have special dispensations so they can't be held accountable for most of what they do. "Protect and Serve"? Don't make me laugh.
I remember the woman who was stopped for a traffic violation, and she said to the cop, "Please don't shoot me." Unfortunately, that was a reasonable request.
If the amount had been small, it wouldn't have mea... (
show quote)
Jerry, I concur, and in the matter of the high $$$ award, that was to send a message that this type of treatment, is a clear and direct violation of the 1st and 4th amendment rights of everyday folks and will not be tolerated.
It would also seem that the elected folks in charge of the police would make sure that poor policy enforcement or lack of training would NEVER be an excuse again.
Independent police oversight and review would be a good start.