OldSchool-WI wrote:
_____________________________(reply)
For many years "candid" camera was and is now more than ever, the norm for shooting people. No more of "say cheese" ---look at everybody's faces and make sure someone is not with a dreaming mind elsewhere---etc. Then return to the camera on the tripod, grab the cable release---look again at the faces---smile at them so they get the idea-------and when all is ready----shoot the 5x7 inch film. YOU DID NOT shoot from the hip. You got a great photo every time. Now everybody grins like idiots in every photo. The photos of Karsh of Ottawa are long forgotten. Yes, it is a different time and most don't need to plan their groups, but put their finger in the air as a previous contributor said, and hope the camera does the rest. ----------------ew
_____________________________(reply) br For many y... (
show quote)
The work of Yosef Karsh is far from forgotten. His books are well-known and well-read and in the library of any serious photograher who is interested in classic portraiture, besides all the regular folks who simply enjoy seeing his portraits of famous people.
I live and work in Ottawa and was familiar with Yosef, Malak Karsh, his brother, a world-class architectural and landscapel photographer, and his Uncle George Nakash (their original Armenian family name) who brought Yosef to Canada and sponsored his photographic education in the United States. Uncle George operated his portrat studio in Montreal and continued in business well into his 90s. My wife's aunt was his retoucher and later took over her father's studio which was established in 1922.
I operated a studio in Montreal, for a time as well, and met George on several occasions. Our professional association, The Corporation of Master Photograhers of Quebec, had a tradition of celebrating George's birthday every year and would hold a party at one of our meetings. We would invite Nephew Yosef to attend and he always responded and would come in and present us with a lecture. The speeches were wonderful- full of philosophy and experiences with celebrities, but never about technical matters.
Some years later, my camera dealer called me and told me that Malic Karsh required my technical help- I was surprised, to say the least. It seemed he transitioned from his trusty 4x5 view camera and purchase a couple of Mamiya RZ 67s- a medium format camera system with a selection of lenses including a tilt/shift model. The cameras were giving him trouble and since I was a user of that system, the dealer thought of sending me over to solve these issues. Malak, his famous brother, was a gracious gentleman and offered me some very strong Turkish coffee. His issue with cameras was easy to solve. I simply reminded him that unlike his trusty old view camer, the RZ would not tolerate being thrust into the trunk of his car, along with the spare tire and lug wrench, and left bouncing over the bumpy road after a shoot. All he needed was a well-padded case and to go easy on the film advance lever. After our session, he asked if he could pay me a consultation fee or do something in return. I replied that it was an honor meeting him and jokingly said, I would gladly settle for sitting in on oneof his "big brother's" portrat sittings. He said, in all seriousness, "I will see what I can do"! About a month later I got the call. I got to see Yosef photographer a Member of the Parlament and an oil company executive. Yosef used an 8x10 Deardorf View camera with a 300mmm Commercial Ektar Lens, a custom-made set of Norman electronic flash units, and Kodak Tri-X Orth Film processed in Pyro- on those two sittings. For color, he used a 4x5 Gowlandflex and a Hasselbald.
These were the last two sessions he did in his studio at the Chateau Laurier Hotel, herein Ottawa, after which he retired. He moved to Boston to be closer to his doctors as he was in failing health. There is a room in that hotel where many of his famous portraits are permintely displayed. His entire collection now resides in the National Archives of Canada.
There are still many practitioners of fine-quality formal portraiture. This is not street photography, photojournalism, or "candid camera" efforts or folks grinning into their cellphone cameras. That stuff is OK too, but ain't classical portraiture.
All this attitude that fine photography is dead and gone is unmitigated nonsense! Some folks find formal portraits boring but everyone does not have the same taste in art, music, food, fashion- whatever. Some years ago, there was a Karsh exhibition in New York City. The art critic for the New York Times wrote a scathing review saying that the subjects looked like "hopeless gargoyles"! I wanted to cancel my subscription but everyone is entitled to their opinions.