Ysarex wrote:
So can I. In response to BebuLamar's post, what I said wasn't a camera control is the exposure slider in a raw converter.
ok.
But the software slider is related to camera ISO is it not? For example +1 on the exposure slider is plus one stop, so that’s 2x the ISO used to capture the frame.
burkphoto wrote:
…Personally, I believe in a very strict definition of "Manual" as meaning NOTHING gets changed unless I change it. If I then use EC, I DO expect the exposure to change. …
Maybe there should be an option to use EC for a single exposure or burst, with the alternate option to retain EC until the user resets it. …
I share that belief. When I use “Manual” I use it to freeze the exposure I had selected. That is most likely when creating a “panorama” with a prime lens to substitute for a distortion ridden wide angle lens. I would appreciate a quick way to a quick way to copy the exposure settings to Manual other than memory or better a notebook.
I don’t understand the mystique surrounding the Manual mode (or any other mode) for arriving at the exposure for a shot. The camera doesn’t need to know how you arrived at a given exposure. But remember you own the results of your settings. So it is best if you know these settings, only three numbers if you include ISO, are indeed sensible to you. BTW They all appear at the bottom of my viewfinder.
User ID wrote:
Send me $50 dollars and Ill sort out five brands and post the result.
We would rather owe it to you than cheat you out of it.
Jack 13088 wrote:
I share that belief. .
Unfortunately what we believe “should be” and the way cameras are designed are not the same. Can we say cognitive dissonance?
JD750 wrote:
ok.
But the software slider is related to camera ISO is it not? For example +1 on the exposure slider is plus one stop, so that’s 2x the ISO used to capture the frame.
The software slider BebuLamar was referring to is the exposure slider in most raw converters. It's used to lighten or darken the image. It's badly named but it's hard to think there's a better name. It lightens/darkens the image proportionately.
On a camera ISO is used to lighten an image that circumstance (available light, action, DOF) forces us to underexpose. It's effect is likewise proportional.
One is a camera function the other is a processing software function but yes they produce similar results.
User ID wrote:
By pony express ?
I could have sent by Pony Express, but it would have gone through Wyoming, considerably north of you.
SnappyHappy wrote:
Not long ago I attended a presentation by a photographer who discussed shooting in manual mode with exposure compensation. When I asked if EC wouldn’t be a mute adjustment in manual mode he claimed simply “it works”. So my question is can EC correct selected manual settings to other settings?
Nikon Df, Nikkor 105mm AF Micro ... Manual Mode, 1/250, F.4, ISO 800
EC 0, +2, +3, -2, -3
---
SnappyHappy wrote:
Not long ago I attended a presentation by a photographer who discussed shooting in manual mode with exposure compensation. When I asked if EC wouldn’t be a mute adjustment in manual mode he claimed simply “it works”. So my question is can EC correct selected manual settings to other settings?
____________________________(reply)
In it's ideal availability the "exposure adjustments" are to correct the baselines of actual "manual adjustments" like "F" stops. If in auto, it might shift the entire mix of the auto setting, well that is different. But taken literally as exposure compensation---it should be setting the "F" stops to accurate baseline with the camera body and, most importantly, the lens system.-----------ew
Bill_de wrote:
Nikon Df, Nikkor 105mm AF Micro ... Manual Mode, 1/250, F.4, ISO 800
EC 0, +2, +3, -2, -3
---
They are all the same, try it again with the "auto ISO sensitivity control" set to "on" uner >Photo shooting menu >ISO Sensitivity Settings >Auto ISO sensitivity control >ON
I think you'll find that the EC control will adjust ISO to alter the exposure.
Ysarex - First of all - why do you feel the need to act like an ass by starting out with an insult? Secondly, not everyone owns the latest camera gear - so my statement that not all cameras allow the use of exposure compensation when in manual mode and with auto ISO is correct. Among the many cameras I own and still use a couple disable exposure comp in this scenario. Some of my other cameras do allow it - so get off your arrogant, know-it-all, attitude.
wdross
Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
Ysarex wrote:
A camera will not unlock the ISO value if the user has set the ISO value. The user would have to allow that change by setting the ISO to auto and then the ISO is no longer a selected manual setting.
I have no doubts that you right along with others saying the same. For my manusl shooting, I would also expect to lock in all three exposure elements with no ability to change any of them by using exposure compensation. Obviously my manual mode sets ISO on a setting value, not "Auto". At least now I know of a way of manually setting aperture and shutter and still exposure compensate. One never stops learning. Maybe I would have found it on my own if I shot manual more. C'est la vie.
OldSchool-WI wrote:
____________________________(reply)
In it's ideal availability the "exposure adjustments" are to correct the baselines of actual "manual adjustments" like "F" stops. If in auto, it might shift the entire mix of the auto setting, well that is different. But taken literally as exposure compensation---it should be setting the "F" stops to accurate baseline with the camera body and, most importantly, the lens system.-----------ew
I have always thought and hope that the modes we are talking about are the strictly the exposure metering modes which adjust the lens aperture (f/ number), shutter speed (1/seconds or seconds) and “sensor sensitivity” (ISO which is a controversial rabbit hole we had best avoid) which were computed using hand held meters or meters coupled to shutter speed and aperture knobs on film cameras. These modes are usually:
Manual - which the photographer sets the aperture and shutter speed with knobs using metering from external or internal meters or maybe rules of thumb like Sunny 16 or the little papers that came with film.
Shutter priority - which the photographer set the shutter speed based on the intent of the scene and sets the desired ISO (or desired range for Auto ISO). The camera automatically adjusts the aperture according to its metering if possible.
Aperture priority - which the photographer sets the aperture and the camera adjusts the shutter.
Auto - which the camera sets both aperture and shutter according to some program that guesses the appropriate combination. Sooner or later they will employ AI (guesses that sell well) to guess what you want.
Often they add other “modes” to adjust color saturation/vibrance, contrast… to make the picture look “better. These modes do not effect raw files letting you make adjustments. I wouldn’t be surprised if they also set the camera for jpeg only. We are not talking about these modes. If you like these modes use a phone they really do point and shoot well.
JD750 wrote:
Unfortunately what we believe “should be” and the way cameras are designed are not the same. Can we say cognitive dissonance?
Well, for the last 25ish years of my career I made a good living writing specifications for what I think the customer likes that the hardware and software guys don’t want to do. So was that cognitive dissonance?
I think it would be fun to design my own camera system. I have been retired since 2007 it would be interesting.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.