brccli1
Loc: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
I use the Tamron 90 mm f2.8 for macro and love it. Sharp and it also doubles as a small telephoto.
Go to KEH and pick up the canon 100mm f2.8 . I got one for around 700.
TexasSky wrote:
I have a Canon EOS T3i, along with a Tamron 18-270mm, f/3.5-6.3, which I currently use. In my bag, I also have a Canon Zoom EF 75-300mm, f/4-5,6; and a Canon EFS 18-55mm. These last two were purchased with my original camera about 7 years ago.
I like to take a lot of flower pictures, so I'm considering a Macro lens (and I've heard that a Macro does take some good portraits, although I don't do many of these.
My question is, "which of the following would be the best purchase?"
A. Canon EF 100mm, f/2.8L Macro IS (Amazon $900)
B. Canon EF 50mm, f/2.5 Compact Macro (Amazon $269)
C. Tamron SP 60mm, f/2 Macro w/internal focusing (Amazon $524)
Feedback would be appreciated.
I have a Canon EOS T3i, along with a Tamron 18-270... (
show quote)
I just purchased a refurbished 100mm F2.8 Canon Macro from Aldorama for about $850 which included free shipping. To me it looked like a brand new lens an packaging. I'm very happy with it.
TexasSky wrote:
I have a Canon EOS T3i, along with a Tamron 18-270mm, f/3.5-6.3, which I currently use. In my bag, I also have a Canon Zoom EF 75-300mm, f/4-5,6; and a Canon EFS 18-55mm. These last two were purchased with my original camera about 7 years ago.
I like to take a lot of flower pictures, so I'm considering a Macro lens (and I've heard that a Macro does take some good portraits, although I don't do many of these.
My question is, "which of the following would be the best purchase?"
A. Canon EF 100mm, f/2.8L Macro IS (Amazon $900)
B. Canon EF 50mm, f/2.5 Compact Macro (Amazon $269)
C. Tamron SP 60mm, f/2 Macro w/internal focusing (Amazon $524)
Feedback would be appreciated.
I have a Canon EOS T3i, along with a Tamron 18-270... (
show quote)
First off, all the lens you mention is a great lens for Macro. However, when selecting a lens you have to consider exactly what you need to get from the lens. You mentioned you like to photograph flowers. Flowers can be shot inside, or in the garden, they do not run away if disturbed. A good choice for flowers is the 50mm f2.5. That is only good if your entire photo life is photographing flowers. Should you develope your skills to bugs, small animals and include flowers, you will need a Macro lens with a little more "reach" or a longer lens. Here you will need the 100mm 2.8 (non L) lens, the Tamron 60mm, or any other Macro lens of this lens lenth. These lenses will allow you to take Macro photos without being so close to your subject, and will be able to auto focus on the subject. Keep in mind using these lenses you will need a tripod to steady the lens, and possibly remote shutter release to stop camera shake as you release the shutter. Camera shake is introduced by your hand, pressing the shutter, and when the mirror snaps up during the shoot. The other option is the lens, like the Canon EF 100mm 2.8L IS. The IS is "image stabilization" this give you the ability to hand hold the lens while shooting. This eliminates the need for a tripod in many cases. Tamron will have a re-designed 90mm lens with their version of IS (called Vibration Control, or VC). That lens will be available on Dec 1. Its cost will be $849.
As of today there is no test data on that lens, so it will be leap of faith for the first few months. I bought the Canon EF 100mm 2.8L Macro. I've taken a few photos with it, but not any "true Macro" yet. It does a great job on portraits, and on close-ups. The clarity of the portraits is beyond great. Which ever lens you buy, enjoy your new toy. Happy Holidays
Love my 100L macro what a amazing sharp lens. I traded for it from NY 180L macro because I wanted a more flexible option and very happy with my decision
I only have experience with two macro lens, the Sigma 105mm F2.8 OS and the Canon 100mm F2.8L IS, used with my old Canon 5D Mk 1. After trying both I settled on the Canon.
Here is a link to my test with both lens:
http://wingincamera.zenfolio.com/lens-testThese shots were all hand held, I was wanting to test each lens OS/IS and sharpness.
I have sense sold all my Canon gear and switched to a Pentax.
That says Patent Pending on the snakes tongue...
wingincamera wrote:
I only have experience with two macro lens, the Sigma 105mm F2.8 OS and the Canon 100mm F2.8L IS, used with my old Canon 5D Mk 1. After trying both I settled on the Canon.
Here is a link to my test with both lens:
http://wingincamera.zenfolio.com/lens-testThese shots were all hand held, I was wanting to test each lens OS/IS and sharpness.
I have sense sold all my Canon gear and switched to a Pentax.
I used Pentax for decades but jumped to Canon for digital - Pentax was lagging at the time.
What persuaded you to change?
You can get the non L for around $550. I have it, and love it. Extremely sharp. If I had the extra $$$, I'd get the L just for IS (I can't imagine the L being much sharper, it's that good).
Larrie wrote:
The 100 2.8 L IS is as good as it gets. If the budget is short the 100 2.8 non L non IS is very good as is the 60 2.8 USM. Many "me too" macros change in physical length when focused which I find to be detrimental. While your at it pick up some extension tubes to super size it. Get a real good tripod. One that has a center column that flips from vertical to horizontal is a plus.
Thanks, Larrie. Appreciate the info!
Canon 2.8 100 mm..my favorite lens...I do a lot of macro...you really do not need the is...use a tripod...I bought mine on Craigs List for $400.00..got to try it out before purchasing....
Nessguide wrote:
Canon 2.8 100 mm..my favorite lens...I do a lot of macro...you really do not need the is...use a tripod...I bought mine on Craigs List for $400.00..got to try it out before purchasing....
Now that was quite a bargain! Congrats on your shrewd frugality.
I have the Canon EF-S Macro 60mm 2.8 (on your list) and love it. Sharp results are present with every shot, and Also have used it for portraits, animals and capturing hummingbirds on the wing. I shoot with a Canon T2i.
Results can be seen at:
http://www.deanmars.com/htmls/Birdsinmybackyard.htm
Festina Lente wrote:
wingincamera wrote:
I only have experience with two macro lens, the Sigma 105mm F2.8 OS and the Canon 100mm F2.8L IS, used with my old Canon 5D Mk 1. After trying both I settled on the Canon.
Here is a link to my test with both lens:
http://wingincamera.zenfolio.com/lens-testThese shots were all hand held, I was wanting to test each lens OS/IS and sharpness.
I have sense sold all my Canon gear and switched to a Pentax.
I used Pentax for decades but jumped to Canon for digital - Pentax was lagging at the time.
What persuaded you to change?
quote=wingincamera I only have experience with tw... (
show quote)
I really liked the 5Dc, but decided I wanted a lighter outfit, plus live view and much higher iso capability. Plus the Pentax K5 II has weather proofing. It has built in wireless flash capability with external flash guns. I also like the backward capability of all the Pentax lens mounts.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.