Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Insurance
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Aug 20, 2022 10:08:11   #
photoman43
 
I have USAA Homeowners insurance. I bought a Personal effects policy from them for my photo equipment. For USAA if you generate any income from your equipment, even $1.00, the policy is null and void. Other insurance companies may have similar clauses but with different restrictions and $ limits. If you are a pro, you may need another policy.

Reply
Aug 20, 2022 10:31:19   #
TonyBot
 
photoman43 wrote:
I have USAA Homeowners insurance. I bought a Personal effects policy from them for my photo equipment. For USAA if you generate any income from your equipment, even $1.00, the policy is null and void. Other insurance companies may have similar clauses but with different restrictions and $ limits. If you are a pro, you may need another policy.


Very true!

If all you have is H.O. insurance and you generate *any* income from the use of your gear and your insurance company finds out: Claim Denied!
And, if you put in a claim for a lot of equipment, say your kit with 2 bodies and 5 lenses plus flash, etc. is taken from your car, they *will* check.

Reply
Aug 20, 2022 10:57:15   #
TucsonDave Loc: Tucson, Arizona
 
rob7789 wrote:
I'm looking to insure my photographic equipment in a separate policy from my home owners policy. Any suggestions?
Thanks.


I have a rider attached to my Home Owners policy with Farmers. It specifies full replacement cost reinbursement.

Reply
 
 
Aug 20, 2022 11:12:17   #
Wayne93 Loc: Montrose, Colorado
 
The problem with home owners is the deductible involved. If your home is insured for 300,000 your deductible will be substantially high before you collect a dime on the loss. I've checked it out.

Reply
Aug 20, 2022 11:18:01   #
NickGee Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
Wayne93 wrote:
The problem with home owners is the deductible involved. If your home is insured for 300,000 your deductible will be substantially high before you collect a dime on the loss. I've checked it out.


Agreed. Like other respondents, I have a "personal articles policy" with State Farm that covers all of my equipment (~$8000 worth), no deductible, replacement (i.e., "new") value. For this I pay about $70 per year.

I was advised not to rely on home owners policy, which has deductibles as well as not necessarily providing replacement values. I should add, however, that such policies are offered for amateurs -- that is, any income generated from photography nullifies the policy. Pros handle this completely differently.

Reply
Aug 20, 2022 11:22:47   #
Wayne93 Loc: Montrose, Colorado
 
True! I just paid my annual premium coverage for 18,000and it ran 239.00 for the year.

Reply
Aug 20, 2022 12:58:46   #
JFCoupe Loc: Kent, Washington
 
rcorne001 wrote:
I use State Farm. It offers a personal property policy that is outside my home owners, which is also with them. As mentioned earlier, I provide a detailed list of the equipment I want covered, including serial numbers. Whenever I get a new piece I simply make a copy of my receipt and send it along with a request to add it to my policy. Should I get something on sale, I provide the regular price and request it be covered for replacement cost. No deductible and provides what I call "idiot's coverage in the event *I* do something stupid. Very easy and fair price. I do periodically go in and change the coverage amount of pieces as the price comes down.
I use State Farm. It offers a personal property p... (show quote)


I also use a State Farm rider. Changes are easy to make. So far, I have not had a claim so I can't comment of claim service.

Reply
 
 
Aug 20, 2022 14:19:32   #
rbest77701
 
If you just want to insure your equipment, then probably a HO rider will work. For me, I show at Art & Craft shows under a DBA, so my HO won't cover liabilty or stuff like that. I have a separate Business Insurance that runs like $135 a quarter thru a local company. Covers me for liability, in case something happens in my booth or a gust of wind caused my booth to damage someone else's property, plus it covers all my equipment, printed photos, printer, computer, etc.

Reply
Aug 20, 2022 14:20:00   #
jstampa
 
USAA is the cheapest if you can use it otherwise State Farm is the second cheapest.
I’ve got $29,000 of replacement cost for about $270 a year. No questions asked. They pay what I listed it for. I added expensive filters and extra batteries as well as tripod and camera bag. It’s all covered as long as your not a pro.

State Farm does the same but it’s a little more expensive.
Home owners policies in Florida are a joke and most won’t add a rider.

Reply
Aug 20, 2022 14:52:30   #
amfoto1 Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
 
If you are a photo hobbyist, never shoot professionally, it is possible and probably best to get a rider on your homeowners (or renters) insurance.

If you ever get paid for your photography, even if it's not your primary source of income, you are a professional and cannot rely upon a homeowner/renter insurance rider. You need a separate policy. One possibility is to get it through PPA or other orgs.

There are actually several types of insurance: One is coverage for your gear against damage, theft, etc. Another type that may be necessary for pro shooters is liability insurance, such as if in a sporting event you are responsible for causing an accident or someone trips over a power cord in your studio. A third type is error and omission where you make a mistake that costs someone money... such as a wedding shoot that goes bad and everything has to be redone.

Reply
Aug 20, 2022 16:21:23   #
James May
 
I joined PPA and got the insurance tru them. the memberships include up to $15,000 of insurance.

Reply
 
 
Aug 20, 2022 16:22:56   #
stevemdr
 
Many homeowner camera policies don't pay off if they deem you a "Professional." PPA is the best source of coverage if you can be called a pro.

Reply
Aug 20, 2022 18:27:45   #
jzett
 
In today’s times of escalating prices, it would be wise to insure for replacement. Even on home insurance, if not insured for replacement value and suffer significant damage, you most likely will be on the hook for quite a large amount to make of the difference. Just look at the price of a sheet of plywood today compared to just a few years ago.

Reply
Aug 20, 2022 18:29:29   #
jzett
 
In today’s times of escalating prices, it would be wise to insure for replacement. Even on home insurance, if not insured for replacement value and suffer significant damage, you most likely will be on the hook for quite a large amount to make of the difference. Just look at the price of a sheet of plywood today compared to just. Few years ago.

Reply
Aug 20, 2022 23:30:20   #
RTCreed Loc: Forest Park, IL
 
Just ask your agent to get you a "floater" addition to your homeowners. I have one for the more expensive jewelry we own, and a separate one for the more expensive Nikon Z stuff I have. There is no deductible, and it is all risk replacement cost coverage. A very inexpensive alternative to buying an Inland Marine floater. If your homeowner's carrier doesn't want to provide one, you may wish to reconsider where your coverage is.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.