Bison Bud wrote:
To those that continue to say that the 2nd Amendment's statement about a "Well Regulated Militia" is acceptable, but that we should still ban military type rifles, just what do you expect a well regulated militia to use? I think there is a good argument to be made that primarily because of this single statement, military type firearms must be available to individual citizens. Do you expect a militia to stand up against a force equipped with full automatic weapons, while they can only have single shot rifles? Maybe better than a sharp stick, but to have a chance there needs to be some parity in available weaponry for a militia to even exist. The founding fathers saw enough need for this to include it in the amendment to protect from tyrannical government as well as defend against invasion, riots, etc. It's really no different now than it was then and really boils down to the fact that the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.
Yeah, we need to do something about these needless and repulsive shooting's, especially in our schools and other soft target/no gun areas, but taking the tools away from those that might actually be able to stop this sort of needless violence is a self defeating if not ridiculous proposition.
I said it earlier in this thread and I'm going to say it again now, the only thing that will have an immediate effect on these nut jobs and needless shootings is to harden security at these soft target, no gun areas, especially our schools. We need to protect those that can't protect themselves, especially our children! Until we take measures to protect ourselves, we will be at serious risk, but instead we insist that the gun is the problem and think we can actually eliminate them from the equation. How foolish and naive can we possibly be? Let's please try to do something that will actually make a difference rather than use these repulsive and needless events to try to promote long time political agendas.
To those that continue to say that the 2nd Amendme... (
show quote)
When I was a kid, the local Army and ROTC had secured buildings where they stored, under lock & key, their military grade rifles.
There is really no reason why, the "well regulated militia" couldn't go back to that process - store your high powered weapons and have total access to them if/when needed.
You blame all this gun violence on mental health yet, you vote for those who want to destroy the mental health system in this country... Gov Abbott for example. Just how do you identify a person, who is going through a mental health situation, before they do something wrong... like buy a gun and go shoot up a school?
We have "trained" police who are responsible for keeping our schools safe. Many of you claim a gun insurance policy would not work, it would be too expensive. But, the very same people who say that, claim that we need to harden our schools, one entrance/exit (which the fire department might disagree with), give guns to the teachers, etc., don't seem to take into consideration that the "government" (state and local) would put that cost burden on the public.
If the "trained" police are afraid to go up against an AR-15, why would you expect the teachers to do it?
Gun insurance won't work but, paying to "harden" schools and train teachers to carry guns will?
Gun insurance is unfair?.... well, what about people who don't have kids and don't have guns? Is it fair that YOU push responsibility onto them over looking deeper into the gun issue?
To see if a high gun homicide rate is tied to lax gun laws, we looked at each state’s firearm homicide rate per 100,000 people from 2015-19 and compared that to its gun-friendliness score, where 1 is the least gun-friendly and 5 is the most gun-friendly. This score is based on individual state laws regarding things like background checks, permit requirements, and open carry rules.
These are the 20 states with the highest firearm homicide rates in the country along with their gun-friendliness scores:
Louisiana: 11.0 (3)
Mississippi: 10.2 (5)
Alabama: 9.5 (4)
Missouri: 8.5 (5)
Maryland: 7.4 (1)
South Carolina: 7.4 (3)
Tennessee: 6.7 (4)
Illinois: 6.5 (2)
Arkansas: 6.2 (3)
Georgia: 6.2 (4)
Alaska: 6.0 (5)
New Mexico: 5.7 (4)
Oklahoma: 5.7 (4)
Indiana: 5.3 (4)
Delaware: 5.1 (2)
North Carolina: 5.0 (4)
Nevada: 4.8 (3)
Ohio: 4.8 (4)
Kentucky: 4.7 (4)
Florida: 4.6 (4)
The vast majority of states with the most gun homicides are states that score a 3 or higher for gun-friendliness, indicating that there may be a correlation.
https://www.criminalattorneycincinnati.com/comparing-gun-control-measures-to-gun-related-homicides-by-state/For those like dennis, who have difficulty understanding what is presented here, and who always point to Chicago as an example... take a closer look as to where Chicago actually sits in this list.... middle of the road, crowded in by red states and lax gun laws.
There is some very telling statistics in this link - Such as Texas - has over 8 million fewer people than California yet, it had only 800 FEWER homicides (2015-19) and is a much gun-friendlier state.