Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Restoration problem
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
Mar 8, 2022 15:01:19   #
revhen Loc: By the beautiful Hudson
 
My attempt



Reply
Mar 8, 2022 15:01:27   #
Horseart Loc: Alabama
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
This is my favorite of all the attempts so far. The skin tones and the greenery in the background are great. Some of the people who attempted it seem to have no idea what good skin tones are.


Yep, you're right about skin color but hey, not meaning to sound snarky but at least we tried to be helpful.

Reply
Mar 8, 2022 15:28:07   #
gchapell
 
One click PSE22 colorize, choose the preview you like the best. FWIW

-george



Reply
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Mar 8, 2022 15:32:14   #
delder Loc: Maryland
 
Watching this process in Real Time is very educational while at the same time showing the limitations of our currently available processes.

Reply
Mar 8, 2022 15:55:57   #
fetzler Loc: North West PA
 
Here is another version. What color was the boy's shirt.


(Download)

Reply
Mar 8, 2022 15:57:51   #
fetzler Loc: North West PA
 
gchapell wrote:
One click PSE22 colorize, choose the preview you like the best. FWIW

-george


Yep I think this is the best!!

Reply
Mar 8, 2022 17:02:35   #
davedyer
 
Photoshopped (many different layers - neural filter, color brushes, luminosity adjustments, etc) from the B&W conversion posted above. no scratches fixed



Reply
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Mar 8, 2022 17:11:40   #
therwol Loc: USA
 
davedyer wrote:
Photoshopped (many different layers - neural filter, color brushes, luminosity adjustments, etc) from the B&W conversion posted above. no scratches fixed


Well, here is the question again. What were the real colors before this colorization? I'll admit that this is a pleasing rendition, but some attempts have different colors, particularly the boy's shirt and even the woman's clothes. They're yellow in most attempts but white here. I did some reading about the neural filter, and it seems that it can apply colors that didn't exist in the original.

Reply
Mar 8, 2022 17:31:52   #
therwol Loc: USA
 
Tom Kiernan wrote:
I have been trying to fix / restore the attached photo to print a book for the kids. It was taken in the mid 70’s with a Nikon F3 and a 105 mm lens. I do not know the settings or other data. It was recently scanned from the negative, Kodak Gold film. Several other negatives from the same period have also faded even though they all were stores in sleeves in a closed box. The scan was at 2400. I tried to fix it with PSE and also Affinity with no real progress. Is there any way to restore it or is it lacking the parameters due to the scan?
I have been trying to fix / restore the attached p... (show quote)


I have read all of the responses and seen all of the attempts to restore this picture. I find it interesting that some of the attempts have different colors, though they may be pleasing. I am going to stick with Vuescan for now. It's simple and very fast and I suspect the colors are more accurate, though I can't be sure without experimentation. Having said that, I want to show one more picture.

A friend of mine is photographing some of his dad's old slides RAW. He sent me one to try to fix. One thing that I must mention is that there is a "crop" function in Vuescan. The entire picture must be within the cropped borders without going over the borders. In other words, the picture has to be uncropped. If not, the color correction changes drastically. The first picture is a .jpeg version of the RAW file he sent me. I worked with the RAW file in Vuescan.


(Download)


(Download)

The next two show the effects of the restoring of the faded colors and color correction on the next screenshot.
The next two show the effects of the restoring of ...
(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Mar 8, 2022 17:43:10   #
gchapell
 
PSE22 Colorize. Just a few clicks. Not perfection but a good base to tweek to your liking. Just a matter of cost/time benefit.
-g



Reply
Mar 8, 2022 17:49:31   #
therwol Loc: USA
 
gchapell wrote:
PSE22 Colorize. Just a few clicks. Not perfection but a good base to tweek to your liking. Just a matter of cost/time benefit.
-g


In a lot of ways yours is a more pleasing picture, definitely warmer and brighter. The only issue I see is that you can't tell that the picture was taken in the fall. All of the trees are bright green. In my version, you can see at least a hint of multi-colored trees in the background. Which is better? It's a matter of taste, of course. Yours is more eye popping. Mine includes a dimension that is overlooked in the colorization process you used. I could have worked on my picture too, but I left that part to my friend who sent the original to me.

Reply
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Mar 8, 2022 17:50:30   #
waltnetto Loc: LaVerne, CA
 
IMHO - the separation of water and boulders elevates this version from therwol's version which shows no separation. So--if the insignificance of the boy's shirt is a problem, so must this be Imortant.

Reply
Mar 8, 2022 17:59:52   #
drrobins Loc: San Francisco East Bay (Walnut Creek)
 
CC2020. Minimal time involved. Enhance>Auto Color Correction. Plus a little Layer>New Adjustment Layer>Levels. Nothing else. Th e Izod shirt color looks right here- I have the same color myself.


(Download)

Reply
Mar 8, 2022 18:24:29   #
gchapell
 
therwol wrote:
In a lot of ways yours is a more pleasing picture, definitely warmer and brighter. The only issue I see is that you can't tell that the picture was taken in the fall. All of the trees are bright green. In my version, you can see at least a hint of multi-colored trees in the background. Which is better? It's a matter of taste, of course. Yours is more eye popping. Mine includes a dimension that is overlooked in the colorization process you used. I could have worked on my picture too, but I left that part to my friend who sent the original to me.
In a lot of ways yours is a more pleasing picture,... (show quote)


I am by no means a master and am not trying to be. I am curious to use the automation tools that are in PSE22. I often don't like the "smart" color/fix/light tools but have found the colorize tool pretty good and then you can refine it. One can spend hours of labor and still chase colors. This colorize tool gets you in the ballpark with the two samples given today. In the case of the river, I would call this extreme deterioration/color issues which it brought in pretty well.

Reply
Mar 8, 2022 18:35:23   #
therwol Loc: USA
 
gchapell wrote:
I am by no means a master and am not trying to be. I am curious to use the automation tools that are in PSE22. I often don't like the "smart" color/fix/light tools but have found the colorize tool pretty good and then you can refine it. One can spend hours of labor and still chase colors. This colorize tool gets you in the ballpark with the two samples given today. In the case of the river, I would call this extreme deterioration/color issues which it brought in pretty well.


I don't disagree in any way with you. Your photo fix stands out in a more pleasing way. What's lost is the variation in color of the trees in the fall. Perhaps the next iteration of this software will be more sensitive to that.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.