I have been trying to fix / restore the attached photo to print a book for the kids. It was taken in the mid 70’s with a Nikon F3 and a 105 mm lens. I do not know the settings or other data. It was recently scanned from the negative, Kodak Gold film. Several other negatives from the same period have also faded even though they all were stores in sleeves in a closed box. The scan was at 2400. I tried to fix it with PSE and also Affinity with no real progress. Is there any way to restore it or is it lacking the parameters due to the scan?
This seems like the PSE edit. Can you create a reply and add the original from the scanner? (being sure to store the file)
CHG_CANON wrote:
This seems like the PSE edit. Can you create a reply and add the original from the scanner? (being sure to store the file)
Agree. Post the original scan to give others a fair crack at it.
This is the earliest scanned version. I have misfiled the negative and when I locate it will scan again and send. Thanks.
I'm not going to say either of these are very good, but it does show what can be done in maybe 5 minutes in LR. There are better PS experts here who can explain the PS / PSE process of removing a color cast. Your high resolution scan gives you lots of pixels to edit and crop for a better composition. I didn't click-thru the image to remove the dust specs, but that work is a must for whatever you end up with via the edited scan. The really 'wonked' negatives might go better with a B&W conversion after you've done your best to recover the colored version.
If your scanner has a 'color restoration' setting, see if 'y' gives a better result from the scanner.
Thanks for the tips. Meanwhile I continue the search for the negative.
joecichjr
Loc: Chicago S. Suburbs, Illinois, USA
CHG_CANON wrote:
I'm not going to say either of these are very good, but it does show what can be done in maybe 5 minutes in LR. There are better PS experts here who can explain the PS / PSE process of removing a color cast. Your high resolution scan gives you lots of pixels to edit and crop for a better composition. I didn't click-thru the image to remove the dust specs, but that work is a must for whatever you end up with via the edited scan. The really 'wonked' negatives might go better with a B&W conversion after you've done your best to recover the colored version.
If your scanner has a 'color restoration' setting, see if 'y' gives a better result from the scanner.
I'm not going to say either of these are very good... (
show quote)
I think you coerced great results for the image 💫💫💫💫💫
I would be very happy with what you have. From the 70s to 2022! I would be tickled pink with it! As is!!
Retired CPO wrote:
I would be very happy with what you have. From the 70s to 2022! I would be tickled pink with it! As is!!
I am very happy with it and need to learn how to do it. Never had to do much in photo software but the time to learn is now!
CHG_CANON wrote:
I'm not going to say either of these are very good, but it does show what can be done in maybe 5 minutes in LR. There are better PS experts here who can explain the PS / PSE process of removing a color cast. Your high resolution scan gives you lots of pixels to edit and crop for a better composition. I didn't click-thru the image to remove the dust specs, but that work is a must for whatever you end up with via the edited scan. The really 'wonked' negatives might go better with a B&W conversion after you've done your best to recover the colored version.
If your scanner has a 'color restoration' setting, see if 'y' gives a better result from the scanner.
I'm not going to say either of these are very good... (
show quote)
Let me show you what I did. I have used the feature that restores faded colors in the software that came with my scanner. I have struggled in Lightroom with faded color photos. I have found that the best "One Stop Shop" for restoring faded color originals is Vuescan. (You have to pay for the professional version to get this feature.) Vuescan can not only work as scanner software, it can work with files. This also took me about 5 minutes. The image also benefits from a slight increase in brightness and a slight reduction in green. See the screenshots after the improved picture.
Tom Kiernan wrote:
This is the earliest scanned version. I have misfiled the negative and when I locate it will scan again and send. Thanks.
So I got intrigued and did this with Luminar Flex (as a standalone - I usually use it as a plug in with LR)
[quote=therwol]Let me show you what I did....
Thanks. I was just writing a reply to ask how you did it. Thanks for the workup and the details.
[quote=Tom Kiernan]
therwol wrote:
Let me show you what I did....
Thanks. I was just writing a reply to ask how you did it. Thanks for the workup and the details.
There are some important details to know. I'll get back to you tomorrow. Gotta watch TV with my wife.
Tom Kiernan wrote:
I have been trying to fix / restore the attached photo to print a book for the kids. It was taken in the mid 70’s with a Nikon F3 and a 105 mm lens. I do not know the settings or other data. It was recently scanned from the negative, Kodak Gold film. Several other negatives from the same period have also faded even though they all were stores in sleeves in a closed box. The scan was at 2400. I tried to fix it with PSE and also Affinity with no real progress. Is there any way to restore it or is it lacking the parameters due to the scan?
I have been trying to fix / restore the attached p... (
show quote)
Sorry, I don't have enough time to clean up the sharpening.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.