Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Does anyone care about a built in flash anymore?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 11 next> last>>
Feb 2, 2022 09:42:37   #
alexol
 
It's sometimes nice to have a tiny amount of fill light, especially for eyes, when you are out and about, and don't want to be carrying all sorts of bits and pieces.

Reply
Feb 2, 2022 09:43:59   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
As the saying goes, you use the camera that you have. Thus you use the flash that you have. Personally I think that they are under utilized, with many situations out there that could benefit from a little fill. It’s just a matter of recognizing when the right opportunity presents itself.

Reply
Feb 2, 2022 09:51:40   #
Canisdirus
 
If I am going to grab my camera...just as easy to grab the flash at the same time...so i don't miss it.
It's also a way to keep the camera bodies more streamlined and lighter.
It's basically old real estate that has lost its location value due to a upwardly mobile neighborhood.

Reply
 
 
Feb 2, 2022 10:08:34   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
I agree that builtins can be handy, especially for firing other flashes remotely. The issue, and the reason they are not included on the better bodies, has to do with weather sealing. Best of luck to all.

Reply
Feb 2, 2022 10:25:34   #
StanMac Loc: Tennessee
 
Bison Bud wrote:
Seems like new camera bodies with a built in flash are becoming a thing of the past, especially in the upper performance level bodies. While I realize that I can always add a hot shoe flash and the ability of a built in one is limited when compared to what can be done with the add on and/or use of slaves, I still think a built in flash is a nice feature to have available. Frankly, if I know I'm going to be doing flash photography, I will indeed use my speedlight setup, but I really don't carry it along regularly and the use of the built in flash has saved my butt a number of times. This is especially true when I simply need a fill flash to expose the subject rather than the background and I've even been rather successful using the built in flash for some low key photography of flowers, etc. Anyway, a built in flash is far from useless in my opinion and since the manufacturers seem to be moving away from them as an option, I was wondering how others out there might feel about them. Good luck and good shooting to all.
Seems like new camera bodies with a built in flash... (show quote)


I having them on the compact digital cameras I have (Canon G9, Lumix ZS100) and the ones on my Pentax K5 and Fuji X-E2S have proved their worth many times.

Stan

Reply
Feb 2, 2022 10:47:13   #
bsmith52 Loc: Northeast Alabama
 
I prefer a built in flash. Most of my photography is with family and family events. Fill flash is what it is best for and when used correctly I can get a good shot in less than ideal lighting that is worth saving. Like and use it on my D7500 and especially my Fuji X100V which meters the light really well. If the D780 would have had it, I would have purchased it.

Reply
Feb 2, 2022 10:48:54   #
alexol
 
+1 many, MANY times re the X100V!

Reply
 
 
Feb 2, 2022 10:55:46   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
cjc2 wrote:
I agree that builtins can be handy, especially for firing other flashes remotely. The issue, and the reason they are not included on the better bodies, has to do with weather sealing. Best of luck to all.


Another reason they quit including them is that the hot shoe needed to be beefed up (reinforced physically) to support things like audio adapters for video recording. My Lumix GH4 is plenty weather sealed, but has a built-in pop-up flash. However, the GH5 and later do not have a flash, but do have a much sturdier shoe mount for the XLR Microphone Adapter DMW-XLR1 and other accessories.

Reply
Feb 2, 2022 11:05:00   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Definitely! Lack of a pop-up flash is a deal breaker for me. I have external flashes, but when I want to throw a little more light onto something, I don't want to go upstairs and dig one out and connect it. The pop-up or built-in is ideal.

Reply
Feb 2, 2022 11:42:35   #
PhotogHobbyist Loc: Bradford, PA
 
I guess I'm still old school, remembering the old film SLRs which did not have a built in flash. I got along fine without them back then and seldom use the built in now. I do have a few strobe flash attachments that I use now and then but usually try to have them off camera with a corded connection or a light sensitive trigger.I truly would not miss the pop up flash but would miss the hot shoe.

Reply
Feb 2, 2022 12:03:41   #
DebAnn Loc: Toronto
 
Bison Bud wrote:
Seems like new camera bodies with a built in flash are becoming a thing of the past, especially in the upper performance level bodies. While I realize that I can always add a hot shoe flash and the ability of a built in one is limited when compared to what can be done with the add on and/or use of slaves, I still think a built in flash is a nice feature to have available. Frankly, if I know I'm going to be doing flash photography, I will indeed use my speedlight setup, but I really don't carry it along regularly and the use of the built in flash has saved my butt a number of times. This is especially true when I simply need a fill flash to expose the subject rather than the background and I've even been rather successful using the built in flash for some low key photography of flowers, etc. Anyway, a built in flash is far from useless in my opinion and since the manufacturers seem to be moving away from them as an option, I was wondering how others out there might feel about them. Good luck and good shooting to all.
Seems like new camera bodies with a built in flash... (show quote)


Yes, agreed. A built-in flash is good when you're faced with the unexpected.

Reply
 
 
Feb 2, 2022 12:14:47   #
Fredrick Loc: Former NYC, now San Francisco Bay Area
 
I do occasionally use the built in flash on my Fuji X100V on sunny days to get rid of shadows on faces. This camera has a leaf shutter, enabling me to flash sync up to 1/4000 of a second. Nice feature to have.

Reply
Feb 2, 2022 12:45:49   #
Robert1 Loc: Davie, FL
 
I do use the build in camera flash. I do have various camera brand and non brand flash, but I still depend on my camera's built in flash when I an not bringing a flash. I do have a mini Lumiquest brand flash diffuser that I can attach to the built in camera flash and I get to avoid those direct hard flash lights on the subject.

Reply
Feb 2, 2022 13:00:27   #
MJPerini
 
I don't believe flagship cameras ever had them because of weather sealing issues.
Their use as an effective flash is fairly limited due to power and location, but their most effective use on some cameras was as a commander for off camera flash, and even that has been obviated by the move to radio controlled flash.
Having said that, I've given a Canon 20 D (6mp) which has one to my 5 year old Grandson who loves it and in auto mode the little flash pops up when the situation calls for it, and 'saves' a lot of his pictures. So for that purpose, it works well. But you probably won't see them going forward on anything but P&S type cameras.
You CAN bounce them in a pinch- (a little make-up mirror works), but a small external flash on an off camera cord always works better.

Reply
Feb 2, 2022 13:18:18   #
Amadeus Loc: New York
 
Just learned recently (embarrassed) that my 80D built in flash can be controlled, lower output, which can be used as fill in. I think that’s a handy feature when in a situation where you wouldn’t carry your flash.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.