Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Curiosity question
Page <<first <prev 6 of 9 next> last>>
Jan 8, 2022 11:25:35   #
lowkick Loc: Connecticut
 
Morning Star wrote:
Neither. I look at the overall photo: do I like it? If yes, it's a keeper. I may touch it up here and there afterwards, but I have to like the photo at first glance to keep it.


The original OP asked, "When you look at a photograph..." He did not ask "when you look at your photographs...". It does not seem that he was asking about how you judge your own photos.

Reply
Jan 8, 2022 11:38:18   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
lowkick wrote:
The original OP asked, "When you look at a photograph..." He did not ask "when you look at your photographs...". It does not seem that he was asking about how you judge your own photos.

That's how I interpreted the question.

Reply
Jan 8, 2022 11:49:55   #
alberio Loc: Casa Grande AZ
 
lowkick wrote:
The original OP asked, "When you look at a photograph..." He did not ask "when you look at your photographs...". It does not seem that he was asking about how you judge your own photos.


I misread the question at first, but on second thought, why would your photos be excluded...they are photos after all.

Reply
 
 
Jan 8, 2022 11:52:12   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
alberio wrote:
I misread the question at first, but on second thought, why would your photos be excluded...they are photos after all.

But not restricted to your photos. Some have responded with how they look at their photos only.

Reply
Jan 8, 2022 11:57:42   #
Morning Star Loc: West coast, North of the 49th N.
 
lowkick wrote:
The original OP asked, "When you look at a photograph..." He did not ask "when you look at your photographs...". It does not seem that he was asking about how you judge your own photos.


When I look at a photograph...
If it is one I took myself, I usually decide quickly if it's a keeper or not.
If I look at a photo someone else took, it's not up to me to decide if it's a keeper or not. However, if it seems the photographer is open to critique or suggestions, I will make suggestions. I try to do that in a positive way, even if the photo is a bad one!
BTW, I rarely look at my own photos within a few days after taking them: after several days I can be much more critical of my own photos!

Reply
Jan 8, 2022 12:00:53   #
alberio Loc: Casa Grande AZ
 
Longshadow wrote:
But not restricted to your photos. Some have responded with how they look at their photos only.


Like I did. I guess I just like to view others with the thoughts of 1. Is it a subject that is of interest to me.
2. If it is, I then look at what the photographer did that I might try myself. Really good professional photos always pose a challenge to me to do better with mine. Post processing is my biggest challenge and that might be because I didn't get the shots correct in the first place.

Reply
Jan 8, 2022 12:09:34   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
alberio wrote:
Like I did. I guess I just like to view others with the thoughts of 1. Is it a subject that is of interest to me.
2. If it is, I then look at what the photographer did that I might try myself. Really good professional photos always pose a challenge to me to do better with mine. Post processing is my biggest challenge and that might be because I didn't get the shots correct in the first place.

When one writes vaguely, wider variations of interpretation are eminent.
(Especially in thread titles..........)
I try to use enough words so there is little room for misinterpretation.
It doesn't always come out that way though.

I guess people don't like typing a lot of words.

Reply
 
 
Jan 8, 2022 12:16:43   #
alberio Loc: Casa Grande AZ
 
Longshadow wrote:
When one writes vaguely, wider variations of interpretation are eminent.
(Especially in thread titles..........)
I try to use enough words so there is little room for misinterpretation.
It doesn't always come out that way though.

I guess people don't like typing a lot of words.


You may be correct, I hate pecking out my thoughts on cellphone using one finger.

Reply
Jan 8, 2022 12:54:08   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
alberio wrote:
You may be correct, I hate pecking out my thoughts on cellphone using one finger.

YUP, agree with that!
I only use the cell for infrequent messaging and internet when I must and not at home (my computer).

Reply
Jan 8, 2022 13:01:59   #
Curmudgeon Loc: SE Arizona
 
I look at the whole thing at once. Either I like it or not

Reply
Jan 8, 2022 13:29:45   #
Ed D Loc: Virginia
 
Have you ever been to an art museum and see a painting you hate? Undoubtedly the painting is in the art museum because others thought it was great or the artist is great. Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. The only person who should judge whether the photo is good or not is the one who took the photo. As the old song says, you can't please everyone so you've got to please yourself.

Reply
 
 
Jan 8, 2022 13:39:07   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Ed D wrote:
Have you ever been to an art museum and see a painting you hate? Undoubtedly the painting is in the art museum because others thought it was great or the artist is great. Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. The only person who should judge whether the photo is good or not is the one who took the photo. As the old song says, you can't please everyone so you've got to please yourself.


I've been to museums and said "What the..." a lot.

Reply
Jan 8, 2022 13:47:20   #
User ID
 
Longshadow wrote:
I can like an image (or not) fairly quickly. Analyze for faults? I don't. Consider what "I" may have done differently? Sometimes, but I keep that to myself, for my own edification.

I don't care what the original may look like, just the final (end) result, the one I am viewing.

The posted image is not the image that the photographer made for himself. It’s just a thumbnail. The missing “original” would be much closer to what the photographer would wish a viewer to view.

The thumbnail as posted is dark and lifeless. Sometimes when you view the DL of a dark image it comes to life with some snap and colors that I’m not seeing in the thumbnail ... thus I would not consider my casual comments on the thumbnail to be legitimate critique of the “real version” of that image.

Reply
Jan 8, 2022 13:49:27   #
User ID
 
Longshadow wrote:
When one writes vaguely, wider variations of interpretation are eminent.
(Especially in thread titles..........)
I try to use enough words so there is little room for misinterpretation.
It doesn't always come out that way though.

I guess people don't like typing a lot of words.

Amen !
(Typed with one finger)

Reply
Jan 8, 2022 13:54:39   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
User ID wrote:
The posted image is not the image that the photographer made for himself. It’s just a thumbnail. The missing “original” would be much closer to what the photographer would wish a viewer to view.

The thumbnail as posted is dark and lifeless. Sometimes when you view the DL of a dark image it comes to life with some snap and colors that I’m not seeing in the thumbnail ... thus I would not consider my casual comments on the thumbnail to be legitimate critique of the “real version” of that image.
The posted image is not the image that the photogr... (show quote)


Now who's nit-picking...
Still an image I can view, even without download capability. I'll like it or not.
"fake" versions work also.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.