Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Nude Photography, Boudoir Photography, NSFW, Discussions and Pictures
Laylafan69...
Page <<first <prev 6 of 11 next> last>>
Jan 5, 2022 16:17:58   #
PaulG Loc: Western Australia
 
rmalarz wrote:
So, you're OK with dishonesty as long as it livens up these pages. That says a lot about your character.
--Bob


Got to agree, here. Undermines the whole integrity of what this forum is about. LF's carryings on were pitiful; end of story!

Reply
Jan 5, 2022 16:27:10   #
PaulG Loc: Western Australia
 
dpullum wrote:
Speight, You "felt something was not quite right" based on the name Laylafan??? ... wow, I had an aunt who was clairvoyant and could speak to the dead. How many here claim to have a supernatural ability to perceive events in the future or beyond normal sensory contact.

Speight, you said "with this guy, " I had always assumed that Laylafan was a woman, perhaps even Layla herself. Are you and others so naive as to believe that women do not appreciate the bodies of other women?

Nothing in your personal description says you are a male or female, people may assume that a bodyshop estimator is male, but that is not a modern way of business. Such a job is not gender specific.

Interesting, that we have UHH people who were also at the Salem Witch Trials... and lead lynch mobs. To accuse even if by "feelings" as Speight has done, is to convict or at least to join the mob smearing reputations.
Speight, You "felt something was not quite ri... (show quote)


I too sensed from the beginning there was something very odd here; but that doesn't make me clairvoyant: merely perceptive. In fact after LF's very first post I pm'd another member to share my concern. Many things didn't seem right. But what amused me most was how easily sucked into this charade certain members were. And that, I think, was the whole point of LF's actions. Not necessarily to pose as a photographer but to experience the thrill of deception (large scale) in whatever form. If that were indeed so you'd have to question that individuals mental/psychological attitude and general stability. They are certainly deluded and someone I would purposely go out of my way to be distanced from.

Reply
Jan 5, 2022 17:02:32   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Paul, very insightful.
--Bob
PaulG wrote:
I too sensed from the beginning there was something very odd here; but that doesn't make me clairvoyant: merely perceptive. In fact after LF's very first post I pm'd another member to share my concern. Many things didn't seem right. But what amused me most was how easily sucked into this charade certain members were. And that, I think, was the whole point of LF's actions. Not necessarily to pose as a photographer but to experience the thrill of deception (large scale) in whatever form. If that were indeed so you'd have to question that individuals mental/psychological attitude and general stability. They are certainly deluded and someone I would purposely go out of my way to be distanced from.
I too sensed from the beginning there was somethin... (show quote)

Reply
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jan 5, 2022 17:12:38   #
John Hicks Loc: Sible Hedinham North Essex England
 
Why all of this vicious banter he put some good pictures that I was pleased to look at

Reply
Jan 5, 2022 17:32:02   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
The vicious banter, as you choose to call it, is the result of the fraudulent representation that he took the photographs. There is plenty of evidence to support that he is not the artist.

This site is supposed to be for photographers to post and share their own work. If you just want to look at photos of naked women, just enter ' naked women ' in google images and have at it to your heart's content.
--Bob

Edit: One may post another's work as an example. However, one should feel obligated to give the creator of that work due credit.

John Hicks wrote:
Why all of this vicious banter he put some good pictures that I was pleased to look at

Reply
Jan 5, 2022 17:32:03   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
Now, don't go and tear other apart.

While I find 95% of the threads deplorable in quality and 50% of the replies incredibly inappropriate, I still respect most of you.

Reply
Jan 5, 2022 17:35:30   #
Stardust Loc: Central Illinois
 
rmalarz wrote:
This is an interesting comment. Especially the bit about these pages being uninspiring and livened up by Laylafan. The reason I find this interesting is that Japonnica joined this site on Jan. 4.


User name: Japonnica
User title (?): new user
Currently: offline
Registration date: Jan 4, 2022
Number of topics created: 0
Number of messages posted: 1
Location: UK
Birthday: N/A
Feedback (?): 0, positive 0.0%
User's pages: list

They must have scoured this section extensively over the last 24 hours. Looks a bit suspicious to me.
--Bob
This is an interesting comment. Especially the bit... (show quote)
Not necessarily. As an open site, I "watched" various sections of UHH for a couple months before I decided to join, although don't remember if this section was available before membership. Although I do agree an unusual choice of first comment on the site.

Reply
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Jan 5, 2022 17:40:50   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Thanks and I appreciate your agreement with the comment. BTW, this section has been available since May 19, 2016.
--Bob
Stardust wrote:
Not necessarily. As an open site, I "watched" various sections of UHH for a couple months before I decided to join, although don't remember if this section was available before membership. Although I do agree an unusual choice of first comment on the site.

Reply
Jan 5, 2022 17:46:16   #
Stardust Loc: Central Illinois
 
rmalarz wrote:
Thanks and I appreciate your agreement with the comment. BTW, this section has been available since May 19, 2016.
--Bob
No I meant wasn't sure if could see Nude Section before becoming a member, not whether it existed. Don't remember if had to certify a certain age to enroll in it because of content?

Reply
Jan 5, 2022 17:48:43   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
I just logged out to see if I could see that section as a non-member. It was there. I believe, as a non-member, the Upcoming Topics section is not visible. The Latest Digest isn't visible to non-members.
--Bob
Stardust wrote:
No I meant wasn't sure if could see Nude Section before becoming a member, not whether it existed. Don't remember if had to certify a certain age to enroll in it because if content?

Reply
Jan 5, 2022 18:17:25   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
My take ( and it’s only a guess) is that the Polaroids were real (no idea how he came by them), but when prodded by other members to produce images of another “model”, he resorted to stealing images from other sources on the web.

Reply
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Jan 5, 2022 19:07:50   #
Thurber Mingus
 
TriX wrote:
My take ( and it’s only a guess) is that the Polaroids were real (no idea how he came by them), but when prodded by other members to produce images of another “model”, he resorted to stealing images from other sources on the web.


I agree. There is no way (in my mind) that he took those polaroids in 2015/2016, I'd bet a large amount that they are authentic to the period they portray. The settings scream 1970s or so, and it would be quite unusual to be able to replicate that look so completely in 2015 without a huge amount of effort and some expense.
I think he may be in possession of old Polaroids, but as TriX says, it seems he came off the rails when challenged to post others than "Layla". Some of the websites which came up in my reverse image searches indicate that Layla was reportedly a stripper and escort, so maybe "LaylaFan" paid for the privilege of taking pics of her in the 70's...who knows.

Reply
Jan 5, 2022 20:13:09   #
Laylafan69 Loc: Paradise Island,Bahamas
 
Thurber Mingus wrote:
I agree. There is no way (in my mind) that he took those polaroids in 2015/2016, I'd bet a large amount that they are authentic to the period they portray. The settings scream 1970s or so, and it would be quite unusual to be able to replicate that look so completely in 2015 without a huge amount of effort and some expense.
I think he may be in possession of old Polaroids, but as TriX says, it seems he came off the rails when challenged to post others than "Layla". Some of the websites which came up in my reverse image searches indicate that Layla was reportedly a stripper and escort, so maybe "LaylaFan" paid for the privilege of taking pics of her in the 70's...who knows.
I agree. There is no way (in my mind) that he too... (show quote)


the polaroids are real from 2015-2016 there is absolutely no trace of them anywhere before then...they were painstakingly staged...not expensive to do at all.

Reply
Jan 5, 2022 20:22:37   #
Thurber Mingus
 
Laylafan69 wrote:
the polaroids are real from 2015-2016 there is absolutely no trace of them anywhere before then...they were painstakingly staged...not expensive to do at all.


Right...thanks for clarifying that.

Reply
Jan 5, 2022 20:29:22   #
Laylafan69 Loc: Paradise Island,Bahamas
 
Thurber Mingus wrote:
Right...thanks for clarifying that.


they would have to be 50+- years old...they are immaculate...the picture is crappy as was common for that 1981 model...My Dad helped me stage these

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Nude Photography, Boudoir Photography, NSFW, Discussions and Pictures
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.