There is a dimension to this activity that is being over looked. Bob has pointed out that images from a publication referred to as Playmate, Playboy and image(s) associated with the American artist Lee Friedlander* where among the sources. Just to help with a little clarity, Playboy is not just a magazine, it is a journal. You can not quote from a magazine as a source, but you may quote from a journal as a source. This is a fine distinction but it is important. Playboy is a journal like Scientific American and other important publications. This is the last place you want to play around with. They will pursue litigation over intellectual property (copy right).

An artist of the caliber as Friedlander, he has no need to play with such silly trivia, there is an art world and galleries and collectors that will come after you, even MOMA has a stake in these things. I can not think that the Web Master for this site would just ignore this with a small slap on the wrist. This is when issues of Federal jurisdiction come into play.

There is much more to all this and being banned from the Hog is the least of this persons problems. There is more going on with this than a simpleton being verbose.


* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Friedlander